IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v23y2018i4d10.1007_s13253-018-0334-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tensor Cubic Smoothing Splines in Designed Experiments Requiring Residual Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Arūnas P. Verbyla

    (CSIRO)

  • Joanne Faveri

    (CSIRO
    Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries)

  • John D. Wilkie

    (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries)

  • Tom Lewis

    (University of the Sunshine Coast)

Abstract

Modelling response surfaces using tensor cubic smoothing splines is presented for three designed experiments. The aim is to show how the analyses can be carried out using the asreml software in the R environment, and details of the analyses including the code to do so are presented in a tutorial style. The experiments were all run over time and involve an explanatory quantitative treatment variable; one experiment is a field trial which has a spatial component and involves an additional treatment. Thus, in addition to the response surface for the time by explanatory variable, modelling of temporal and, for the third experiment, of temporal and spatial effects at the residual level is required. A linear mixed model is used for analysis, and a mixed model representation of the tensor cubic smoothing spline is described and seamlessly incorporated in the full linear mixed model. The analyses show the flexibility and capacity of asreml for complex modelling. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Suggested Citation

  • Arūnas P. Verbyla & Joanne Faveri & John D. Wilkie & Tom Lewis, 2018. "Tensor Cubic Smoothing Splines in Designed Experiments Requiring Residual Modelling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(4), pages 478-508, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:23:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s13253-018-0334-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-018-0334-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-018-0334-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-018-0334-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanne De Faveri & Arūnas P. Verbyla & Brian R. Cullis & Wayne S. Pitchford & Robin Thompson, 2017. "Residual Variance–Covariance Modelling in Analysis of Multivariate Data from Variety Selection Trials," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Marx, Brian D. & Eilers, Paul H. C., 1998. "Direct generalized additive modeling with penalized likelihood," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 193-209, August.
    3. Michael G. Kenward, 1987. "A Method for Comparing Profiles of Repeated Measurements," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 36(3), pages 296-308, November.
    4. repec:wyi:journl:002174 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ruppert,David & Wand,M. P. & Carroll,R. J., 2003. "Semiparametric Regression," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521780506, November.
    6. Mariola Sánchez-González & María Durbán & Dae-Jin Lee & Isabel Cañellas & Hortensia Sixto, 2017. "Smooth additive mixed models for predicting aboveground biomass," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(1), pages 23-41, March.
    7. Simon N. Wood, 2006. "Low-Rank Scale-Invariant Tensor Product Smooths for Generalized Additive Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 1025-1036, December.
    8. Gerda Claeskens, 2004. "Restricted likelihood ratio lack‐of‐fit tests using mixed spline models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(4), pages 909-926, November.
    9. Luo Xiao & Yingxing Li & David Ruppert, 2013. "Fast bivariate P-splines: the sandwich smoother," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 577-599, June.
    10. Arũnas P. Verbyla & Brian R. Cullis & Michael G. Kenward & Sue J. Welham, 1999. "The Analysis of Designed Experiments and Longitudinal Data by Using Smoothing Splines," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 48(3), pages 269-311.
    11. Lee, Dae-Jin & Durbán, María & Eilers, Paul, 2013. "Efficient two-dimensional smoothing with P-spline ANOVA mixed models and nested bases," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 22-37.
    12. Ruppert,David & Wand,M. P. & Carroll,R. J., 2003. "Semiparametric Regression," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521785167, November.
    13. Inyoung Kim & Noah D. Cohen & Raymond J. Carroll, 2003. "Semiparametric Regression Splines in Matched Case-Control Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 1158-1169, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin P. Boer & Hans-Peter Piepho & Emlyn R. Williams, 2020. "Linear Variance, P-splines and Neighbour Differences for Spatial Adjustment in Field Trials: How are they Related?," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 676-698, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Øystein Sørensen & Anders M. Fjell & Kristine B. Walhovd, 2023. "Longitudinal Modeling of Age-Dependent Latent Traits with Generalized Additive Latent and Mixed Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 456-486, June.
    2. Lee, Wang-Sheng & McKinnish, Terra, 2019. "Locus of control and marital satisfaction: Couple perspectives using Australian data," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Mariola Sánchez-González & María Durbán & Dae-Jin Lee & Isabel Cañellas & Hortensia Sixto, 2017. "Smooth additive mixed models for predicting aboveground biomass," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(1), pages 23-41, March.
    4. Morteza Amini & Mahdi Roozbeh & Nur Anisah Mohamed, 2024. "Separation of the Linear and Nonlinear Covariates in the Sparse Semi-Parametric Regression Model in the Presence of Outliers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Takuma Yoshida, 2019. "Two stage smoothing in additive models with missing covariates," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 1803-1826, December.
    6. Hübler, Olaf, 2017. "Health and Body Mass Index: No Simple Relationship," IZA Discussion Papers 10620, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Simon N. Wood & Zheyuan Li & Gavin Shaddick & Nicole H. Augustin, 2017. "Generalized Additive Models for Gigadata: Modeling the U.K. Black Smoke Network Daily Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(519), pages 1199-1210, July.
    8. Thomas Kneib & Nadja Klein & Stefan Lang & Nikolaus Umlauf, 2019. "Modular regression - a Lego system for building structured additive distributional regression models with tensor product interactions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(1), pages 1-39, March.
    9. Takuma Yoshida, 2016. "Asymptotics and smoothing parameter selection for penalized spline regression with various loss functions," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 70(4), pages 278-303, November.
    10. Philip T. Reiss & Lei Huang & Pei‐Shien Wu & Huaihou Chen & Stan Colcombe, 2017. "Pointwise influence matrices for functional‐response regression," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1092-1101, December.
    11. Simon N. Wood & Natalya Pya & Benjamin Säfken, 2016. "Smoothing Parameter and Model Selection for General Smooth Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1548-1563, October.
    12. Jaime Pinilla & Miguel Negrín, 2021. "Non-Parametric Generalized Additive Models as a Tool for Evaluating Policy Interventions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, February.
    13. Hübler, Olaf, 2017. "Health and weight – gender-specific linkages under heterogeneity, interdependence and resilience factors," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 96-111.
    14. Lee, Wang-Sheng, 2014. "Big and Tall: Is there a Height Premium or Obesity Penalty in the Labor Market?," IZA Discussion Papers 8606, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Cui, Xia & Zhao, Weihua & Lian, Heng & Liang, Hua, 2019. "Pursuit of dynamic structure in quantile additive models with longitudinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 42-60.
    16. Otto-Sobotka, Fabian & Salvati, Nicola & Ranalli, Maria Giovanna & Kneib, Thomas, 2019. "Adaptive semiparametric M-quantile regression," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 116-129.
    17. Arthur Charpentier & Emmanuel Flachaire & Antoine Ly, 2017. "Econom\'etrie et Machine Learning," Papers 1708.06992, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    18. Hyunju Son & Youyi Fong, 2021. "Fast grid search and bootstrap‐based inference for continuous two‐phase polynomial regression models," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), May.
    19. Welham, S.J. & Thompson, R., 2009. "A note on bimodality in the log-likelihood function for penalized spline mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 920-931, February.
    20. Wei Huang & Oliver Linton & Zheng Zhang, 2022. "A Unified Framework for Specification Tests of Continuous Treatment Effect Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 1817-1830, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:23:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s13253-018-0334-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.