IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v22y2020i3d10.1007_s10796-020-10015-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Technology as Situated Practice: Everyday use of Voice User Interfaces Among Diverse Groups of Users in Urban India

Author

Listed:
  • Linus Kendall

    (Sheffield Hallam University)

  • Bidisha Chaudhuri

    (International Institute of Information Technology Bangalore)

  • Apoorva Bhalla

    (International Institute of Information Technology Bangalore)

Abstract

As smartphones have become ubiquitous across urban India, voice user interfaces (VUIs) are increasingly becoming part of diverse groups of users’ daily experiences. These technologies are now generally accessible as a result of improvements in mobile Internet access, [-8.5pc]Biography is Required. Please provide. introduction of low-cost smartphones and the ongoing process of their localisation into Indian languages. However, when people engage with technologies in their everyday lives, they not only enact the material attributes of the artifact but also draw on their skills, social positions, prior experience and societal norms and expectations to make use of the artifact. Drawing on Orlikowski’s analytical framework of “technologies-in-practice” we engage in an interview-based exploratory study among diverse groups of users in urban India to understand use of VUIs as situated practice. We identify three technologies-in-practice emerging through enactment of VUIs on users’ smartphones: looking up, learning and leisure. We argue that – instead of asking why and how users appropriate VUIs – identifying different kinds of enactments of VUIs present researchers and practitioners with a more nuanced understanding of existing and potential use of VUIs across varied contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Linus Kendall & Bidisha Chaudhuri & Apoorva Bhalla, 2020. "Understanding Technology as Situated Practice: Everyday use of Voice User Interfaces Among Diverse Groups of Users in Urban India," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 585-605, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:22:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-020-10015-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-020-10015-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-020-10015-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-020-10015-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giulia Pozzi & Federico Pigni & Claudio Vitari, 2014. "Affordance Theory in the IS Discipline: a Review and Synthesis of the Literature," Post-Print halshs-01923663, HAL.
    2. Giulia Pozzi & Federico Pigni & Claudio Vitari, 2014. "Affordance Theory in the IS Discipline: a Review and Synthesis of the Literature," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01923663, HAL.
    3. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2000. "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 404-428, August.
    4. Susan A. Brown, 2008. "Household technology adoption, use, and impacts: Past, present, and future," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 397-402, September.
    5. Alladi Venkatesh, 2008. "Digital home technologies and transformation of households," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 391-395, September.
    6. Orlikowski, Wanda J. (Wanda Janina), 1999. "Technologies-in-practice : an enacted lens for studying technology in organizations," Working papers WP 4056-99., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Priya Seetharaman & Saji K. Mathew & Maung K. Sein & Ravindra Babu Tallamraju, 0. "Being (more) Human in a Digitized World," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-4.
    2. Priya Seetharaman & Saji K. Mathew & Maung K. Sein & Ravindra Babu Tallamraju, 2020. "Being (more) Human in a Digitized World," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 529-532, June.
    3. Edona Elshan & Naim Zierau & Christian Engel & Andreas Janson & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2022. "Understanding the Design Elements Affecting User Acceptance of Intelligent Agents: Past, Present and Future," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 699-730, June.
    4. Fatuma Namisango & Kyeong Kang & Ghassan Beydoun, 2022. "How the Structures Provided by Social Media Enable Collaborative Outcomes: A Study of Service Co-creation in Nonprofits," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 517-535, April.
    5. Efpraxia D. Zamani & Nancy Pouloudi & George M. Giaglis & Jonathan Wareham, 2022. "Appropriating Information Technology Artefacts through Trial and Error: The Case of the Tablet," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 97-119, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linus Kendall & Bidisha Chaudhuri & Apoorva Bhalla, 0. "Understanding Technology as Situated Practice: Everyday use of Voice User Interfaces Among Diverse Groups of Users in Urban India," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    2. Matthijs J. Verhulst & Anne-Françoise Rutkowski, 2018. "Decision-Making in the Police Work Force: Affordances Explained in Practice," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 827-852, October.
    3. Xu, Jinying & Lu, Weisheng, 2022. "Developing a human-organization-technology fit model for information technology adoption in organizations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Birgul Basarir-Ozel & Hande Bahar Turker & Vesile Aslihan Nasir, 2022. "Identifying the Key Drivers and Barriers of Smart Home Adoption: A Thematic Analysis from the Business Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Maedeh Yassaee & Tobias Mettler, 2019. "Digital Occupational Health Systems: What Do Employees Think about it?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 909-924, August.
    6. Zhengyang Liu, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of Affordance Theory in Enhancing Digital Health Solutions," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 19(1), pages 59-72.
    7. Jeanine Warisse Turner & N. Lamar Reinsch, 2010. "Successful and unsuccessful multicommunication episodes: Engaging in dialogue or juggling messages?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 277-285, July.
    8. Cécile Godé & Sébastien Brion & Amélie Bohas, 2020. "The Affordance-Actualization process in a Predictive Policing Context: insights from the French Military Police," Post-Print hal-02500125, HAL.
    9. Alexis Pokrovsky, 2017. "Un camion peut-il devenir un véhicule institutionnel ? La matérialité des food trucks, entre conflit de légitimité et création d’identité," Post-Print hal-02549883, HAL.
    10. Helen J. Richardson, 2009. "A ‘smart house’ is not a home: The domestication of ICTs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 599-608, November.
    11. Rhode Ghislaine Nguewo Ngassam & Roxana Ologeanu Taddei & Isabelle Bourdon & Jorick Lartigau, 2019. "Digital service innovation enabled by the blockchain use in healthcare: the case of the allergic patients ledger," Post-Print hal-02282170, HAL.
    12. Sven Laumer & Andreas Eckhardt & Natascha Trunk, 2010. "Do as your parents say?—Analyzing IT adoption influencing factors for full and under age applicants," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 169-183, April.
    13. Emanuel Stoeckli & Christian Dremel & Falk Uebernickel & Walter Brenner, 2020. "How affordances of chatbots cross the chasm between social and traditional enterprise systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 369-403, June.
    14. Chulhwan Chris Bang, 2015. "Information systems frontiers: Keyword analysis and classification," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 217-237, February.
    15. Ferran Pérez & Claudio Vitari, 2020. "An affordance perspective to understand the relationship between organization and IT [La perspective des affordances pour comprendre les relations entre organisations et TIC]," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03026906, HAL.
    16. Ferran Pérez & Claudio Vitari, 2020. "An affordance perspective to understand the relationship between organization and IT [La perspective des affordances pour comprendre les relations entre organisations et TIC]," Post-Print hal-03026906, HAL.
    17. Gan, QingQiu & Lau, Raymond Yiu Keung, 2024. "Trust in a ‘trust-free’ system: Blockchain acceptance in the banking and finance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    18. Chakraborty, Debarun & Polisetty, Aruna & G, Sowmya & Rana, Nripendra P. & Khorana, Sangeeta, 2024. "Unlocking the potential of AI: Enhancing consumer engagement in the beauty and cosmetic product purchases," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Kertcher, Zack & Venkatraman, Rohan & Coslor, Erica, 2020. "Pleasingly parallel: Early cross-disciplinary work for innovation diffusion across boundaries in grid computing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 581-594.
    20. Pandza, Krsto & Ellwood, Paul, 2013. "Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1112-1125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:22:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-020-10015-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.