IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v19y2017i4d10.1007_s10796-016-9703-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The acceptance of ‘intelligent trade shows’: Visitors’ evaluations of IS innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Sunyoung Hlee

    (Kyung Hee University)

  • Jimin Lee

    (Kyung Hee University)

  • Daeseop Moon

    (Korea Railroad Research Institute)

  • Changsok Yoo

    (Kyung Hee University)

Abstract

Trade Shows (TSs) provide “high-quality information,” as thousands of specialists and experts are gathered in one place at one time. Thus, information technology systems become essential for TSs. This study explores the characteristics of TSs’ onsite Information Technology (IT). This study aim to explore the relationships among onsite IT usage, visitors’ effectiveness and perception through the innovation characteristics (i.e., relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity). The study was conducted at a representative TS in Korea and used a survey approach to empirically understand the perception of onsite IT usage. The findings suggest that the four characteristics of product intelligence are influential factors of TSs’ onsite IT. Among them, relative advantage and compatibility had positive impacts on TS effectiveness, while complexity did not. In addition, discussions of the results, theoretical and practical implications for practitioners, limitations, and suggestions for future studies are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunyoung Hlee & Jimin Lee & Daeseop Moon & Changsok Yoo, 2017. "The acceptance of ‘intelligent trade shows’: Visitors’ evaluations of IS innovation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 717-729, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:19:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-016-9703-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-016-9703-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-016-9703-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-016-9703-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deborah R. Compeau & Christopher A. Higgins, 1995. "Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 118-143, June.
    2. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & David Wastell & Sven Laumer & Helle Zinner Henriksen & Michael D. Myers & Deborah Bunker & Amany Elbanna & M. N. Ravishankar & Shirish C. Srivastava, 2015. "Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 143-157, February.
    3. Hansen, Kare, 2004. "Measuring performance at trade shows: Scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Holbrook, Morris B., 2006. "Consumption experience, customer value, and subjective personal introspection: An illustrative photographic essay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 714-725, June.
    5. Labay, Duncan G & Kinnear, Thomas C, 1981. "Exploring the Consumer Decision Process in the Adoption of Solar Energy Systems," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 8(3), pages 271-278, December.
    6. Susan A. Sherer & Rajiv Kohli & Ayelet Baron, 2003. "Complementary Investment in Change Management and IT Investment Payoff," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 321-333, September.
    7. Munuera, Jose L. & Ruiz, Salvador, 1999. "Trade Fairs as Services: A Look at Visitors' Objectives in Spain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 17-24, January.
    8. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    9. Rijsdijk, S.A. & Hultink, E.J. & Diamantopoulos, A., 2007. "Product Intelligence: Its Conceptualization, Measurement and Impact on Consumer Satisfaction," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-006-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chulmo Koo & Francesco Ricci & Cihan Cobanoglu & Fevzi Okumus, 2017. "Special issue on smart, connected hospitality and tourism," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 699-703, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sunyoung Hlee & Jimin Lee & Daeseop Moon & Changsok Yoo, 0. "The acceptance of ‘intelligent trade shows’: Visitors’ evaluations of IS innovation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-13.
    2. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    3. Vishanth Weerakkody & Zahir Irani & Kawal Kapoor & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 0. "Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the Citizen’s perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    4. Vishanth Weerakkody & Zahir Irani & Kawal Kapoor & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2017. "Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the Citizen’s perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 285-300, April.
    5. Igbaria, M. & Iivari, J., 1995. "The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 587-605, December.
    6. Zerbini, Fabrizio & Borghini, Stefania, 2015. "Release capacity in the vendor selection process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 405-414.
    7. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Banita Lal & Michael D. Williams & Marc Clement, 2017. "Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-568, June.
    8. Ivan Ðula & Tabea Berberena & Ksenia Keplinger & Maria Wirzberger, 2024. "From challenges to opportunities: navigating the human response to automated agents in the workplace," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13000 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Yunis Ali Ahmed & Ammar Rashid & Muhammad Mahboob Khurshid, 2022. "Investigating the Determinants of the Adoption of Solar Photovoltaic Systems—Citizen’s Perspectives of Two Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    11. Netsanet Haile & Jörn Altmann, 2016. "Structural analysis of value creation in software service platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(2), pages 129-142, May.
    12. Jozé Braz de Araújo & Silvia Novaes Zilber, 2016. "What Factors Lead Companies to Adopt Social Media in their processes: Proposal and Test of a Measurement Model," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 13(6), pages 260-290, November.
    13. Kwok-Kee Wei & Hock-Hai Teo & Hock Chuan Chan & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2011. "Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 170-187, March.
    14. Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2019. "An Empirical Study of How the Learning Attitudes of College Students toward English E-Tutoring Websites Affect Site Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Barbara L. Marcolin & Deborah R. Compeau & Malcolm C. Munro & Sid L. Huff, 2000. "Assessing User Competence: Conceptualization and Measurement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 37-60, March.
    16. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Anand Jeyaraj & Marc Clement & Michael D. Williams, 2019. "Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 719-734, June.
    17. Rajiv Sabherwal & Anand Jeyaraj & Charles Chowa, 2006. "Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1849-1864, December.
    18. Xu, Zeshui & Ge, Zijing & Wang, Xinxin & Skare, Marinko, 2021. "Bibliometric analysis of technology adoption literature published from 1997 to 2020," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Alexander Mayr & Philip Stahmann & Maximilian Nebel & Christian Janiesch, 2024. "Still doing it yourself? Investigating determinants for the adoption of intelligent process automation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Zhengwei Xia & Dongming Wu & Langlang Zhang, 2022. "Economic, Functional, and Social Factors Influencing Electric Vehicles’ Adoption: An Empirical Study Based on the Diffusion of Innovation Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    21. Yu-Ping Lee & Hsin-Yeh Tsai & Athapol Ruangkanjanases, 2020. "The Determinants for Food Safety Push Notifications on Continuance Intention in an E-Appointment System for Public Health Medical Services: The Perspectives of UTAUT and Information System Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:19:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-016-9703-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.