IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v18y2016i3d10.1007_s10796-015-9606-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From product-centric to customer-centric services in a financial institution – exploring the organizational challenges of the transition process

Author

Listed:
  • Olivera Marjanovic

    (University of Sydney)

  • Vijaya Murthy

    (The University of Sydney)

Abstract

This research aims to contribute to an increased understanding of the strategic, cultural and other organizational challenges in a transition process from product-centric to customer-centric services. The paper describes an exploratory case study, conducted in a complex financial services organization in the context of their customer-facing services. The transition process was examined through the theoretical lens of Work System Theory (WST), following the argument made by previous researchers that service systems could be seen as work systems. This holistic theory enabled us to capture the three key phases of the transition process as work systems snapshots and through their evolving relationships show the manner in which the transitions occurred from one phase to another. This innovative approach provided the researchers with an in-depth insight into key issues related to organizational environment, strategy, customers, products and services, processes and activities, participants, and information and technologies – all relevant for each phase of the transition process. This research contributes to both information systems (IS) and service science research, bringing the key service research priority of “service infusion” to the attention of IS researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivera Marjanovic & Vijaya Murthy, 2016. "From product-centric to customer-centric services in a financial institution – exploring the organizational challenges of the transition process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 479-497, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9606-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-015-9606-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-015-9606-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-015-9606-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vandermerwe, Sandra & Rada, Juan, 1988. "Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 314-324, December.
    2. Paul R. Carlile, 2004. "Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 555-568, October.
    3. Jonathan W. Palmer & M. Lynne Markus, 2000. "The Performance Impacts of Quick Response and Strategic Alignment in Specialty Retailing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 241-259, September.
    4. Sandra Gountas & John Gountas & Felix T Mavondo, 2014. "Exploring the associations between standards for service delivery (organisational culture), co-worker support, self-efficacy, job satisfaction and customer orientation in the real estate industry," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 39(1), pages 107-126, February.
    5. Miri Kim & Jaeki Song & Jason Triche, 2015. "Toward an integrated framework for innovation in service: A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 533-546, June.
    6. Stanley Deetz, 1996. "Crossroads---Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 191-207, April.
    7. Jian Tang & Ping Zhang & Philip Fei Wu, 2015. "Categorizing consumer behavioral responses and artifact design features: The case of online advertising," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 513-532, June.
    8. Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2015. "The algorithm and the crowd: considering the materiality of service innovation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57601, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Eaton, Ben & Elaluf-Calderwood, Silvia & Sorensen, Carsten & Yoo, Youngjin, 2015. "Distributed tuning of boundary resources: the case of Apple's iOS service system," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63272, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Bang Viet Nguyen & Frada Burstein & Julie Fisher, 2015. "Improving service of online health information provision: A case of usage-driven design for health information portals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 493-511, June.
    11. Jaeki Song & Jeff Baker & Fred D. Davis, 2015. "Special section on the role of information technology in service delivery," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 471-474, June.
    12. Ravi Seethamraju, 2015. "Adoption of Software as a Service (SaaS) Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs)," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 475-492, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santiago Carbó Valverde & Pedro J. Cuadros Solas & Francisco Rodríguez Fernández, 2020. "Taxonomy of the Spanish FinTech ecosystem and the drivers of FinTechs’ performance," Revista de Estabilidad Financiera, Banco de España, issue Primavera.
    2. Arne De Keyser & Yves Van Vaerenbergh, 2024. "Beyond the snafu: Research directions in customer experience-led business transformation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(1), pages 144-157, June.
    3. Haluk Demirkan & James C. Spohrer, 2016. "Emerging service orientations and transformations (SOT)," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 407-411, June.
    4. Vinay Reddy Venumuddala & Rajalaxmi Kamath, 2023. "Work Systems in the Indian Information Technology (IT) Industry Delivering Artificial Intelligence (AI) Solutions and the Challenges of Work from Home," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1375-1399, August.
    5. Santiago Carbó Valverde & Pedro J. Cuadros Solas & Francisco Rodríguez Fernández, 2020. "Taxonomy of the Spanish FinTech ecosystem and the drivers of FinTechs’ performance," Revista de Estabilidad Financiera, Banco de España, issue Spring.
    6. Rainer Alt & Roman Beck & Martin T. Smits, 2018. "FinTech and the transformation of the financial industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 235-243, August.
    7. Santiago Carbó Valverde & Pedro J. Cuadros Solas & Francisco Rodríguez Fernández, 2020. "Taxonomy of the Spanish FinTech ecosystem and the drivers of FinTechs’ performance," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue Spring.
    8. Sophie Cockcroft & Mark Russell, 2018. "Big Data Opportunities for Accounting and Finance Practice and Research," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(3), pages 323-333, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaeki Song & Jeff Baker & Fred D. Davis, 2015. "Special section on the role of information technology in service delivery," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 471-474, June.
    2. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Paslauski, Carolline Amaral & Ghezzi, Antonio & Frank, Alejandro Germán, 2017. "Knowledge sharing dynamics in service suppliers' involvement for servitization of manufacturing companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 538-553.
    4. Brunswicker, Sabine & Schecter, Aaron, 2019. "Coherence or flexibility? The paradox of change for developers’ digital innovation trajectory on open platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    5. Palmer, Mark & Toral, Inci & Truong, Yann & Lowe, Fiona, 2022. "Institutional pioneers and articulation work in digital platform infrastructure-building," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 930-945.
    6. Hsin Hsin Chang & Yao-Chuan Tsai & Chen-Su Fu & Shu-Hui Chen & Yao Peng, 2016. "Exploring the antecedents and consequences of technology and knowledge integration mechanisms in the context of NPD," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1165-1189, December.
    7. Ravi Thambusamy & Prashant Palvia, 2020. "U.S. Healthcare Provider Capabilities and Performance: the Mediating Roles of Service Innovation and Quality," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 91-111, February.
    8. Theresa Eckert & Stefan Hüsig, 2022. "Innovation portfolio management: a systematic review and research agenda in regards to digital service innovations," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 187-230, February.
    9. Anne Casati & Corine Genet, 2014. "Principal investigators as scientific entrepreneurs," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 11-32, February.
    10. Marcus Grieger & André Ludwig, 2019. "On the move towards customer-centric business models in the automotive industry - a conceptual reference framework of shared automotive service systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 473-500, September.
    11. Claudio Vitari & Elisabetta Raguseo, 2016. "Big data value and financial performance: an empirical investigation [Digital data, dynamic capability and financial performance: an empirical investigation in the era of Big Data]," Post-Print halshs-01923271, HAL.
    12. Parry, Glenn & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran, 2012. "Servitisation and value co-production in the UK music industry: An empirical study of Consumer Attitudes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 320-332.
    13. Jessica Persson & Ann Svensson & Ingela Grönbeck Lindén & Sven Kylén & Catharina Hägglin, 2022. "Aspects of Expansive Learning in the Context of Healthy Ageing—A Formative Intervention between Dental Care and Municipal Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    15. Seppo Kuula & Harri Haapasalo & Arto Tolonen, 2018. "Cost-efficient co-creation of knowledge intensive business services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(4), pages 779-808, December.
    16. Daniele T. P. Souza & Eugenia A. Kuhn & Arjen E. J. Wals & Pedro R. Jacobi, 2020. "Learning in, with, and through the Territory: Territory-Based Learning as a Catalyst for Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Siri Jagstedt & Magnus Persson, 2019. "Using Platform Strategies In The Development Of Integrated Product-Service Solutions," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-36, May.
    18. Marte C.W. Solheim & Ron Boschma & Sverre Herstad, 2018. "Related variety, unrelated variety and the novelty content of firm innovation in urban and non-urban locations," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1836, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2018.
    19. Zhewei Zhang & Youngjin Yoo & Kalle Lyytinen & Aron Lindberg, 2021. "The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1192-1213, December.
    20. Huigang Liang & Nianxin Wang & Yajiong Xue & Shilun Ge, 2017. "Unraveling the Alignment Paradox: How Does Business—IT Alignment Shape Organizational Agility?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 863-879, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9606-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.