IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v7y2016i1d10.1007_s13198-014-0252-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematical modeling and fuzzy availability analysis of skim milk powder system of a dairy plant

Author

Listed:
  • Anil Kr. Aggarwal

    (Pt. L.R. College of Technology (Technical campus))

  • Sanjeev Kumar

    (YMCA University of Science and Technology)

  • Vikram Singh

    (YMCA University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Conventional reliability analysis relies on the probability theory and the binary states i.e. success or failed state of a component or system only. This type of reliability analysis amplifies the uncertainty in computation of system reliability. To overcome this problem, the concept of fuzzy reliability has been used in the evaluation of reliability of the system and the binary states i.e. success and failure of a component or system is viewed in a fuzzy way. Mathematical formulation of the fault-tolerant skim milk powder system is carried out using mnemonic rule and the governing Chapman–Kolmogorov differential equations are solved with fourth order Runge–Kutta method. In this paper, the effect of failure rate, repair rate of each subsystem and coverage factor on fuzzy availability of skim milk powder system is analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Anil Kr. Aggarwal & Sanjeev Kumar & Vikram Singh, 2016. "Mathematical modeling and fuzzy availability analysis of skim milk powder system of a dairy plant," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(1), pages 322-334, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s13198-014-0252-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-014-0252-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-014-0252-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-014-0252-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myers, Albert F. & Rauzy, Antoine, 2008. "Assessment of redundant systems with imperfect coverage by means of binary decision diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 1025-1035.
    2. Antonsson, Erik K. & Sebastian, Hans-Jurgen, 2005. "Fuzzy fitness functions applied to engineering design problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(3), pages 794-811, November.
    3. Levitin, Gregory & Amari, Suprasad V., 2008. "Multi-state systems with multi-fault coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(11), pages 1730-1739.
    4. Daneshkhah, Alireza & Bedford, Tim, 2013. "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of system availability using Gaussian processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 82-93.
    5. Li, Chun-yang & Chen, Xun & Yi, Xiao-shan & Tao, Jun-yong, 2010. "Heterogeneous redundancy optimization for multi-state series–parallel systems subject to common cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 202-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Rui & Mo, Huadong & Xie, Min & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "Optimal structure of multi-state systems with multi-fault coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 18-25.
    2. Qingqing Zhai & Rui Peng & Liudong Xing & Jun Yang, 2013. "Binary decision diagram-based reliability evaluation of k-out-of-(n + k) warm standby systems subject to fault-level coverage," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(5), pages 540-548, October.
    3. Jafary, Bentolhoda & Fiondella, Lance, 2016. "A universal generating function-based multi-state system performance model subject to correlated failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 16-27.
    4. Peiravi, Abdossaber & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Zanjani, Masoumeh Kazemi, 2022. "Universal redundancy strategy for system reliability optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    5. Gholinezhad, Hadi & Zeinal Hamadani, Ali, 2017. "A new model for the redundancy allocation problem with component mixing and mixed redundancy strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 66-73.
    6. Al Ali, Hannah & Daneshkhah, Alireza & Boutayeb, Abdesslam & Malunguza, Noble Jahalamajaha & Mukandavire, Zindoga, 2022. "Exploring dynamical properties of a Type 1 diabetes model using sensitivity approaches," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 324-342.
    7. Hannah Al Ali & Alireza Daneshkhah & Abdesslam Boutayeb & Zindoga Mukandavire, 2022. "Examining Type 1 Diabetes Mathematical Models Using Experimental Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Yeh, Wei-Chang, 2017. "Evaluation of the one-to-all-target-subsets reliability of a novel deterioration-effect acyclic multi-state information network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 132-137.
    9. Abou, Seraphin C., 2010. "Performance assessment of multi-state systems with critical failure modes: Application to the flotation metallic arsenic circuit," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 614-622.
    10. Briš, Radim, 2010. "Exact reliability quantification of highly reliable systems with maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(12), pages 1286-1292.
    11. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Ben-Haim, Hanoch & Dai, Yuanshun, 2011. "Multi-state systems with selective propagated failures and imperfect individual and group protections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1657-1666.
    12. Maaroufi, Ghofrane & Chelbi, Anis & Rezg, Nidhal, 2013. "Optimal selective renewal policy for systems subject to propagated failures with global effect and failure isolation phenomena," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 61-70.
    13. Attar, Ahmad & Raissi, Sadigh & Khalili-Damghani, Kaveh, 2017. "A simulation-based optimization approach for free distributed repairable multi-state availability-redundancy allocation problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 177-191.
    14. Piriou, Pierre-Yves & Faure, Jean-Marc & Lesage, Jean-Jacques, 2017. "Generalized Boolean logic Driven Markov Processes: A powerful modeling framework for Model-Based Safety Analysis of dynamic repairable and reconfigurable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 57-68.
    15. Byun, Ji-Eun & Song, Junho, 2021. "Generalized matrix-based Bayesian network for multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    16. Azadeh, A. & Maleki Shoja, B. & Ghanei, S. & Sheikhalishahi, M., 2015. "A multi-objective optimization problem for multi-state series-parallel systems: A two-stage flow-shop manufacturing system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 62-74.
    17. Gao, Shan, 2023. "Reliability analysis and optimization for a redundant system with dependent failures and variable repair rates," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 637-659.
    18. Aniruddha Samanta & Kajla Basu, 2019. "Multi-objective reliability redundancy allocation problem considering two types of common cause failures," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(3), pages 369-383, June.
    19. R Briš & P Byczanski, 2010. "Direct unavailability computation of a maintained highly reliable system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 224(3), pages 159-170, September.
    20. KanÄ ev, DuÅ¡ko & ÄŒepin, Marko, 2012. "A new method for explicit modelling of single failure event within different common cause failure groups," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 84-93.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s13198-014-0252-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.