IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v10y2019i5d10.1007_s13198-019-00826-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy rule-based reliability analysis using NSGA-II

Author

Listed:
  • Hemant Kumar

    (Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee)

  • Shiv Prasad Yadav

    (Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee)

Abstract

Practically, reliability-based system designs are modeled in various kinds of uncertainty such as expert’s information character, qualitative statements, vagueness, etc. Fuzzy set theory is suitable for tackling such types of uncertainty effectively. In most of the practical situations, where reliability enhancement is an essential requirement, decision-making is a complicated task due to the presence of several mutually conflicting objectives such as system’s cost, weight, and volume. To solve such problems, multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are efficient techniques for finding multiple Pareto-optimal solutions in a single simulation run. This paper applies an elitist MOEA, namely, NSGA-II to fuzzy multi-objective reliability optimization problem consisting of conflicting objectives such as system reliability and its cost. Linguistic hedges (or modifiers) are used to modify the Pareto-optimal solution set obtained by NSGA-II in terms of the membership grades of the objective values. The max–min composition of the membership grades gives the maximum satisfaction level to each possible combination of the linguistic hedges. After that, fuzzy rule-based system (FRBS) is proposed for evaluating the system efficiency to each case which is used in the decision-making of reliability. A numerical example is given to illustrate the method. Finally, the proposed approach is comparatively studied with the existing approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Hemant Kumar & Shiv Prasad Yadav, 2019. "Fuzzy rule-based reliability analysis using NSGA-II," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(5), pages 953-972, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:10:y:2019:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00826-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-019-00826-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-019-00826-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-019-00826-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Heungseob & Kim, Pansoo, 2017. "Reliability–redundancy allocation problem considering optimal redundancy strategy using parallel genetic algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 153-160.
    2. Konak, Abdullah & Coit, David W. & Smith, Alice E., 2006. "Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(9), pages 992-1007.
    3. Hong-Zhong Huang & Jian Qu & Ming Zuo, 2009. "Genetic-algorithm-based optimal apportionment of reliability and redundancy under multiple objectives," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 287-298.
    4. Hemant Kumar & Shiv Prasad Yadav, 2017. "NSGA-II based fuzzy multi-objective reliability analysis," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(4), pages 817-825, December.
    5. Salazar, Daniel & Rocco, Claudio M. & Galván, Blas J., 2006. "Optimization of constrained multiple-objective reliability problems using evolutionary algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(9), pages 1057-1070.
    6. Taboada, Heidi A. & Baheranwala, Fatema & Coit, David W. & Wattanapongsakorn, Naruemon, 2007. "Practical solutions for multi-objective optimization: An application to system reliability design problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 314-322.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D Aqnan Marusaha Matthew & Ashkan Jahanbani Ghahfarokhi & Cuthbert Shang Wui Ng & Menad Nait Amar, 2023. "Proxy Model Development for the Optimization of Water Alternating CO 2 Gas for Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abouei Ardakan, Mostafa & Rezvan, Mohammad Taghi, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of reliability–redundancy allocation problem with cold-standby strategy using NSGA-II," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 225-238.
    2. Khalili-Damghani, Kaveh & Amiri, Maghsoud, 2012. "Solving binary-state multi-objective reliability redundancy allocation series-parallel problem using efficient epsilon-constraint, multi-start partial bound enumeration algorithm, and DEA," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 35-44.
    3. Khalili-Damghani, Kaveh & Abtahi, Amir-Reza & Tavana, Madjid, 2013. "A new multi-objective particle swarm optimization method for solving reliability redundancy allocation problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 58-75.
    4. Andrés Cacereño & David Greiner & Blas J. Galván, 2021. "Multi-Objective Optimum Design and Maintenance of Safety Systems: An In-Depth Comparison Study Including Encoding and Scheduling Aspects with NSGA-II," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-39, July.
    5. Cao, Dingzhou & Murat, Alper & Chinnam, Ratna Babu, 2013. "Efficient exact optimization of multi-objective redundancy allocation problems in series-parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 154-163.
    6. Safari, Jalal, 2012. "Multi-objective reliability optimization of series-parallel systems with a choice of redundancy strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 10-20.
    7. Selçuklu, Saltuk Buğra & Coit, David W. & Felder, Frank A., 2020. "Pareto uncertainty index for evaluating and comparing solutions for stochastic multiple objective problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 644-659.
    8. Zhang, Enze & Wu, Yifei & Chen, Qingwei, 2014. "A practical approach for solving multi-objective reliability redundancy allocation problems using extended bare-bones particle swarm optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 65-76.
    9. Chenyang Ma & Wei Wang & Zhiqiang Cai & Jiangbin Zhao, 2022. "Maintenance optimization of reconfigurable systems based on multi-objective Birnbaum importance," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 277-289, April.
    10. Shan, Songqing & Wang, G. Gary, 2008. "Reliable design space and complete single-loop reliability-based design optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(8), pages 1218-1230.
    11. Attar, Ahmad & Raissi, Sadigh & Khalili-Damghani, Kaveh, 2017. "A simulation-based optimization approach for free distributed repairable multi-state availability-redundancy allocation problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 177-191.
    12. L Podofillini & E Zio, 2008. "Events group risk importance by genetic algorithms," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(3), pages 337-346, September.
    13. Cao, Ran & Coit, David W. & Hou, Wei & Yang, Yushu, 2020. "Game theory based solution selection for multi-objective redundancy allocation in interval-valued problem parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Torres-Echeverría, A.C. & Martorell, S. & Thompson, H.A., 2009. "Design optimization of a safety-instrumented system based on RAMS+C addressing IEC 61508 requirements and diverse redundancy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 162-179.
    15. Mohammad N. Juybari & Pardis Pourkarim Guilani & Mostafa Abouei Ardakan, 2022. "Bi-objective sequence optimization in reliability problems with a matrix-analytic approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 275-304, May.
    16. Abdullah Konak & Alice E. Smith, 2011. "Efficient Optimization of Reliable Two-Node Connected Networks: A Biobjective Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 430-445, August.
    17. Dolatshahi-Zand, Ali & Khalili-Damghani, Kaveh, 2015. "Design of SCADA water resource management control center by a bi-objective redundancy allocation problem and particle swarm optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 11-21.
    18. Nahar F. Alshammari & Mohamed Mahmoud Samy & Shimaa Barakat, 2023. "Comprehensive Analysis of Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms for Sustainable Hybrid Electric Vehicle Charging Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-31, April.
    19. Gupta, Pankaj & Mittal, Garima & Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar, 2013. "Expected value multiobjective portfolio rebalancing model with fuzzy parameters," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 190-203.
    20. Weifan Zhong & Lijing Du, 2023. "Predicting Traffic Casualties Using Support Vector Machines with Heuristic Algorithms: A Study Based on Collision Data of Urban Roads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:10:y:2019:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00826-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.