IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/flsman/v29y2017i3d10.1007_s10696-016-9262-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing complex service structures in liner shipping network design

Author

Listed:
  • Kristian Thun

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Henrik Andersson

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Marielle Christiansen

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

One of the most important strategic decisions of a liner shipping company is the design of a set of cyclic routes, services, for container vessels to provide transport for goods from origins to destinations. This problem is called the liner shipping network design problem (LSNDP). The cyclic nature of the services as well as the possibility of transshipping cargoes between services makes the problem difficult to solve for large instances. Therefore, it is common to make assumptions regarding the structure of the services. We analyze the effect of different structures ranging from simple ones visiting a port once in a service, to butterfly services where one port can be visited twice in a service and a more general structure where every port in a service can be visited more than once. To perform these analyses, we have developed a new mathematical model for the LSNDP where there are no limitations on the number of visits to each port. The model is solved by a branch-and-price method, where we for the sake of computational time have reduced the number of visits per port on a service to a maximum of two. The computational study shows that complex service structures can create more cost-efficient networks and that the objective value can be improved by allowing general service structures even for small sized instances.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristian Thun & Henrik Andersson & Marielle Christiansen, 2017. "Analyzing complex service structures in liner shipping network design," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 535-552, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:29:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10696-016-9262-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10696-016-9262-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10696-016-9262-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10696-016-9262-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mulder, Judith & Dekker, Rommert, 2014. "Methods for strategic liner shipping network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 367-377.
    2. Liu, Zhiyuan & Meng, Qiang & Wang, Shuaian & Sun, Zhuo, 2014. "Global intermodal liner shipping network design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 28-39.
    3. Richa Agarwal & Özlem Ergun, 2008. "Ship Scheduling and Network Design for Cargo Routing in Liner Shipping," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 175-196, May.
    4. Christiansen, Marielle & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Nygreen, Bjørn & Ronen, David, 2013. "Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 467-483.
    5. Zheng, Jianfeng & Meng, Qiang & Sun, Zhuo, 2015. "Liner hub-and-spoke shipping network design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 32-48.
    6. Gelareh, Shahin & Pisinger, David, 2011. "Fleet deployment, network design and hub location of liner shipping companies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 947-964.
    7. Kjetil Fagerholt *, 2004. "Designing optimal routes in a liner shipping problem," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 259-268, October.
    8. Cynthia Barnhart & Ellis L. Johnson & George L. Nemhauser & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh & Pamela H. Vance, 1998. "Branch-and-Price: Column Generation for Solving Huge Integer Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 316-329, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christiansen, Marielle & Hellsten, Erik & Pisinger, David & Sacramento, David & Vilhelmsen, Charlotte, 2020. "Liner shipping network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 1-20.
    2. Gam Thi Hong Nguyen & Daria Ruzaeva & Julio Cesar Góez & Mario Guajardo, 2022. "Insights on the introduction of autonomous vessels to liner shipping networks," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Hellsten, Erik Orm & Sacramento, David & Pisinger, David, 2022. "A branch-and-price algorithm for solving the single-hub feeder network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 902-916.
    4. Chen, Jingxu & Jia, Shuai & Wang, Shuaian & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2018. "Subloop-based reversal of port rotation directions for container liner shipping network alteration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 336-361.
    5. Havre, Håkon Furnes & Lien, Ulrik & Ness, Mattias Myklebust & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Rødseth, Kenneth Løvold, 2024. "Network design with route planning for battery electric high-speed passenger vessel services," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 102-119.
    6. Kristian Thun & Henrik Andersson & Magnus Stålhane, 2020. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Liner Shipping Network Design Problem," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Magnus Bolstad Holm & Carl Axel Benjamin Medbøen & Kjetil Fagerholt & Peter Schütz, 2019. "Shortsea liner network design with transhipments at sea: a case study from Western Norway," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 598-619, September.
    8. Nicanor García Álvarez & Belarmino Adenso-Díaz & Laura Calzada-Infante, 2021. "Maritime Traffic as a Complex Network: a Systematic Review," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 387-417, June.
    9. David F. Koza & Guy Desaulniers & Stefan Ropke, 2020. "Integrated Liner Shipping Network Design and Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 512-533, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Dong & Pan, Kai & Wang, Shuaian, 2018. "On service network improvement for shipping lines under the one belt one road initiative of China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 82-95.
    2. Chen, Jingxu & Jia, Shuai & Wang, Shuaian & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2018. "Subloop-based reversal of port rotation directions for container liner shipping network alteration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 336-361.
    3. Zheng, Jianfeng & Sun, Zhuo & Zhang, Fangjun, 2016. "Measuring the perceived container leasing prices in liner shipping network design with empty container repositioning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 123-140.
    4. Nguyen Khoi Tran & Hans-Dietrich Haasis & Tobias Buer, 2017. "Container shipping route design incorporating the costs of shipping, inland/feeder transport, inventory and CO2 emission," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(4), pages 667-694, December.
    5. Wang, Shuaian, 2014. "A novel hybrid-link-based container routing model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 165-175.
    6. Zheng, Jianfeng & Qi, Jingwen & Sun, Zhuo & Li, Feng, 2018. "Community structure based global hub location problem in liner shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-19.
    7. Akyüz, M. Hakan & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2016. "Service type assignment and container routing with transit time constraints and empty container repositioning for liner shipping service networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 46-71.
    8. Gianfranco FANCELLO & Patrizia SERRA & Simona MANCINI, 2019. "A Network Design Optimization Problem For Ro-Ro Freight Transport In The Tyrrhenian Area," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 14(4), pages 63-76, December.
    9. Santini, Alberto & Plum, Christian E.M. & Ropke, Stefan, 2018. "A branch-and-price approach to the feeder network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 607-622.
    10. Zhen, Lu & Shen, Tao & Wang, Shuaian & Yu, Shucheng, 2016. "Models on ship scheduling in transshipment hubs with considering bunker cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 111-121.
    11. Mulder, J. & Dekker, R., 2016. "Will liner ships make fewer port calls per route?," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-04, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    12. Zheng, Jianfeng & Meng, Qiang & Sun, Zhuo, 2014. "Impact analysis of maritime cabotage legislations on liner hub-and-spoke shipping network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 874-884.
    13. Mulder, J. & Dekker, R., 2016. "Optimization in container liner shipping," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-05, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    14. Msakni, Mohamed Kais & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Meisel, Frank & Lindstad, Elizabeth, 2020. "Analyzing different designs of liner shipping feeder networks: A case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Wang, Shuaian & Liu, Zhiyuan & Meng, Qiang, 2015. "Segment-based alteration for container liner shipping network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 128-145.
    16. Zheng, Jianfeng & Meng, Qiang & Sun, Zhuo, 2015. "Liner hub-and-spoke shipping network design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 32-48.
    17. Milan Janić, 2018. "Multidimensional examination of the performances of a liner shipping network: trunk line/route operated by conventional (Panamax Max) and mega (ULC - ultra large container) ships," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-35, December.
    18. Brouer, Berit Dangaard & Desaulniers, Guy & Pisinger, David, 2014. "A matheuristic for the liner shipping network design problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 42-59.
    19. Karsten, Christian Vad & Brouer, Berit Dangaard & Desaulniers, Guy & Pisinger, David, 2017. "Time constrained liner shipping network design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 152-162.
    20. Peng, Wenhao & Bai, Xiwen, 2022. "Prospects for improving shipping companies’ profit margins by quantifying operational strategies and market focus approach through AIS data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 138-152.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:29:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10696-016-9262-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.