IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i14p3949-d250068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A System to Determine the Optimal Work-in-Progress Inventory Stored in Interoperation Manufacturing Buffers

Author

Listed:
  • Patrik Grznár

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Milan Gregor

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Štefan Mozol

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Martin Krajčovič

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Ľuboslav Dulina

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Martin Gašo

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Michal Major

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

Abstract

Continuous cost reduction is a subject of interest for almost every production company. The cost reflects the competitiveness and sustainability of the business. Many company costs are linked to the effectiveness of production. One such cost is the work-in-progress (WIP) inventory cost. The present article deals with the design of a system for calculating the optimal WIP inventory stored in a manufacturing buffer, which, in the long term, provides the lowest costs. The main goal of the article is to design a new system that allows for the calculation of the optimal capacity of interoperation manufacturing buffers and thus the calculation of the optimal WIP inventory, which influences the lead time and cost. The newly designed system consists of algorithms that describe various steps, many of which use mathematical models. The individual blocks of algorithms are described, and the proposed system is verified and validated by simulation of the production line in the automotive production company.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrik Grznár & Milan Gregor & Štefan Mozol & Martin Krajčovič & Ľuboslav Dulina & Martin Gašo & Michal Major, 2019. "A System to Determine the Optimal Work-in-Progress Inventory Stored in Interoperation Manufacturing Buffers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-36, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:3949-:d:250068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/14/3949/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/14/3949/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shi, Chuan & Gershwin, Stanley B., 2009. "An efficient buffer design algorithm for production line profit maximization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 725-740, December.
    2. Peter Bubeník & Filip Horák, 2014. "Proactive Approach to Manufacturing Planning," Quality Innovation Prosperity, Technical University of Košice, Department of integrated management, vol. 18(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Branislav Micieta & Vladimira Binasova & Radovan Lieskovsky & Martin Krajcovic & Luboslav Dulina, 2019. "Product Segmentation and Sustainability in Customized Assembly with Respect to the Basic Elements of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guan Wang & Yang Woo Shin & Dug Hee Moon, 2016. "Comparison of three flow line layouts with unreliable machines and profit maximization," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 669-693, December.
    2. Miroslav Fusko & Monika Bučková & Martin Gašo & Martin Krajčovič & Ľuboslav Dulina & Radovan Skokan, 2019. "Concept of Long-Term Sustainable Intralogistics in Plastic Recycling Factory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-27, November.
    3. George Liberopoulos, 2020. "Comparison of optimal buffer allocation in flow lines under installation buffer, echelon buffer, and CONWIP policies," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 297-365, June.
    4. Nahas, Nabil & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Gendreau, Michel, 2014. "Selecting machines and buffers in unreliable assembly/disassembly manufacturing networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 113-126.
    5. Cruz, F.R.B. & Van Woensel, T. & Smith, J. MacGregor, 2010. "Buffer and throughput trade-offs in M/G/1/K queueing networks: A bi-criteria approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 224-234, June.
    6. Puchkova, Alena & McFarlane, Duncan & Srinivasan, Rengarajan & Thorne, Alan, 2020. "Resilient planning strategies to support disruption-tolerant production operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. Arpita Basak & Amit Choudhury, 2024. "Bayesian estimation of finite buffer size in single server Markovian queuing system," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(6), pages 2366-2373, June.
    8. Shi, Chuan & Gershwin, Stanley B., 2016. "Part sojourn time distribution in a two-machine line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 146-158.
    9. Przemysław Korytkowski & Tomasz Wiśniewski, 2011. "Performance analysis of commercial offset printing under dynamic priority rules," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 21(1), pages 53-64.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:3949-:d:250068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.