IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fininn/v11y2025i1d10.1186_s40854-024-00704-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial performance evaluation of firms in BIST 100 index with ITARA and COBRA methods

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Katrancı

    (Pamukkale University)

  • Nilsen Kundakcı

    (Pamukkale University)

  • Dragan Pamucar

    (University of Belgrade
    Yuan Ze University
    Western Caspian University)

Abstract

Evaluating firms’ financial performance is important for survival in the competitive environment arising from technological advancements and gaining a competitive advantage. This study aims to assess the financial performances of firms traded on the Istanbul Stock Exchange 100 Index (Borsa Istanbul (BIST) 100 Index) between 2018 and 2022 using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. This is the first study to use a new combined approach proposed based on the indifference threshold-based attribute ratio analysis (ITARA) and cost estimation, benchmarking, and risk assessment (COBRA) methods, which have not been applied to corporate performance assessment. The ITARA method is used to find the weights of the criteria, and the ranking of the firms in terms of financial performance is obtained using the COBRA method. The results show that the firms with the highest financial performance are ISMEN, ALGYO, PGSUS, KOZAA, and IPEKE. The companies with the lowest financial performance are AKFGY, BAGFS, MGROS, KOZAL, and GOZDE. The results of this ranking provide important information for firms to recognize their position and for investors who want to invest in firms in the BIST 100 Index. Additionally, sensitivity analyses are performed to assess the impact of changes in the criteria on the ranking of the firms and to validate the results of the proposed method. A comparative analysis is made with different MCDM methods like the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) methods and Spearman’s rank correlation test results are presented. This approach leads to the conclusion that the proposed approach can be a useful and effective tool for assessing the financial performance of firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Katrancı & Nilsen Kundakcı & Dragan Pamucar, 2025. "Financial performance evaluation of firms in BIST 100 index with ITARA and COBRA methods," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:fininn:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-024-00704-5
    DOI: 10.1186/s40854-024-00704-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40854-024-00704-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40854-024-00704-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mladen Krstić & Giulio Paolo Agnusdei & Pier Paolo Miglietta & Snežana Tadić & Violeta Roso, 2022. "Applicability of Industry 4.0 Technologies in the Reverse Logistics: A Circular Economy Approach Based on COmprehensive Distance Based RAnking (COBRA) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, May.
    2. Joseph Junior Aduba, 2022. "Correction to: Framework for firm-level performance evaluations using multivariate linear correlation with MCDM methods: application to Japanese firms," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 45-45, February.
    3. Berna Bulgurcu, 2013. "Financial Performance Ranking of the Automotive Industry Firms in Turkey: Evidence from an Entropy-Weighted Technique," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 3(4), pages 844-851.
    4. Sarveshwar Kumar Inani & Rohit Gupta, 2017. "Evaluating financial performance of Indian IT firms: an application of a multi-criteria decision-making technique," International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 126-139.
    5. Larissa M. Batrancea & Anca Nichita & Andreas-Daniel Cocis, 2022. "Financial Performance and Sustainable Corporate Reputation: Empirical Evidence from the Airline Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Svetlana Dabić-Miletić & Mladen Božić, 2023. "Smart Material Handling Solutions for City Logistics Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Mahmut Baydaş & Dragan Pamučar, 2022. "Determining Objective Characteristics of MCDM Methods under Uncertainty: An Exploration Study with Financial Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Joseph Junior Aduba, 2022. "Framework for firm-level performance evaluations using multivariate linear correlation with MCDM methods: application to Japanese firms," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-44, February.
    9. Feng, Cheng-Min & Wang, Rong-Tsu, 2000. "Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 133-142.
    10. Mohamed Abdel-Basset & Weiping Ding & Rehab Mohamed & Noura Metawa, 2020. "An integrated plithogenic MCDM approach for financial performance evaluation of manufacturing industries," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 192-218, September.
    11. Alptekin Ulutaş & Darjan Karabasevic & Gabrijela Popovic & Dragisa Stanujkic & Phong Thanh Nguyen & Çağatay Karaköy, 2020. "Development of a Novel Integrated CCSD-ITARA-MARCOS Decision-Making Approach for Stackers Selection in a Logistics System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Hasheminasab, Hamidreza & Streimikiene, Dalia & Pishahang, Mohammad, 2023. "A novel energy poverty evaluation: Study of the European Union countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmet Kaya & Dragan Pamucar & Hasan Emin Gürler & Mehmet Ozcalici, 2024. "Determining the financial performance of the firms in the Borsa Istanbul sustainability index: integrating multi criteria decision making methods with simulation," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-44, December.
    2. Faruk Dayi & Ali Cilesiz & Mustafa Yucel, 2024. "Strategic Management of Clean Energy Investments: Financial Performance Insights by Using BWM-based VIKOR and TOPSIS Methods," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 566-574, September.
    3. Ek-anong Tangrukwaraskul & Kiriya Kulchanarat, 0000. "Post Pandemic Digital Transformation and Comparative Analysis of ICT Firms in the Stock Exchange of Thailand using TOPSIS Technique," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 14716382, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    4. Chia-Chen Yang & Shang-Ling Ou & Li-Chang Hsu, 2019. "A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Evaluating Companies’ Green Credit Rating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Bruno Ricca & Massimiliano Ferrara & Salvatore Loprevite, 2023. "Searching for an effective accounting-based score of firm performance: a comparative study between different synthesis techniques," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3575-3602, August.
    6. Mahmut BAKIR & Şahap AKAN & Kasım KIRACI & Darjan KARABASEVIC & Dragisa STANUJKIC & Gabrijela POPOVIC, 2020. "Multiple-Criteria Approach of the Operational Performance Evaluation in the Airline Industry: Evidence from the Emerging Markets," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 149-172, July.
    7. Bartosz Sawik, 2024. "Optimizing Last-Mile Delivery: A Multi-Criteria Approach with Automated Smart Lockers, Capillary Distribution and Crowdshipping," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-29, May.
    8. Yousaf Muhammad & Dey Sandeep Kumar, 2022. "Best proxy to determine firm performance using financial ratios: A CHAID approach," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 22(3), pages 219-239, September.
    9. Francis, Graham & Humphreys, Ian & Fry, Jackie, 2005. "The nature and prevalence of the use of performance measurement techniques by airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 207-217.
    10. Hyungjin Shin & Gyumin Lee & Jaenam Lee & Sehoon Kim & Inhong Song, 2023. "Assessment of Agricultural Drought Vulnerability with Focus on Upland Fields and Identification of Primary Management Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Chen Jo-Hui & Diaz John Francis T., 2021. "Application of grey relational analysis and artificial neural networks on currency exchange-traded notes (ETNs)," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 25(2), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Thanh Ngo & Kan Wai Hong Tsui, 2022. "Estimating the confidence intervals for DEA efficiency scores of Asia-Pacific airlines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3411-3434, September.
    13. Namık Kemal Erdoğan & Serpil Altınırmak & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2016. "Comparison of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with respect to performance of food firms listed in BIST," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 5(1), pages 67-90.
    14. Chiuling Lu & Ann Yang & Jui-Feng Huang, 2015. "Bankruptcy predictions for U.S. air carrier operations: a study of financial data," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 39(3), pages 574-589, July.
    15. RUSU Radu & OPREAN-STAN Camelia, 2024. "A New Conceptual Framework For Assessing Corporate Financial Performance. A Sustainable Approach," Management of Sustainable Development, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 16(2), pages 82-88, December.
    16. Iwona Bąk & Katarzyna Wawrzyniak & Maciej Oesterreich, 2024. "Assessment of Impact of Use of Renewable Energy Sources on Level of Energy Poverty in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Roman Vavrek, 2019. "Evaluation of the Impact of Selected Weighting Methods on the Results of the TOPSIS Technique," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1821-1843, November.
    18. Samuka Mohanty & Rajashree Dash, 2023. "A New Dual Normalization for Enhancing the Bitcoin Pricing Capability of an Optimized Low Complexity Neural Net with TOPSIS Evaluation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, February.
    19. Sami Özcan & Murat Serçemeli & Ali Kemal Çelik, 2024. "Analyzing the Effects of Covid-19 Pandemic on the Financial Performance of Turkish Listed Companies on Borsa Istanbul using the Entropy-based Grey Relational Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 109-124, September.
    20. George E. Halkos & Panagiotis-Stavros C. Aslanidis, 2023. "Addressing Multidimensional Energy Poverty Implications on Achieving Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fininn:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-024-00704-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.