IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iefpro/14716382.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Post Pandemic Digital Transformation and Comparative Analysis of ICT Firms in the Stock Exchange of Thailand using TOPSIS Technique

Author

Listed:
  • Ek-anong Tangrukwaraskul

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Kasetsart University)

  • Kiriya Kulchanarat

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Kasetsart University)

Abstract

Thailand's information and communications technology (ICT) sector is experiencing rapid growth according to several factors including increase in technology adoption and government initiatives. This study aims to propose a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDC) model to measure and to compare the financial performance of eighteen ICT firms listed firms in Stock Exchange of Thailand. These firms are examined and assessed using eight financial ratios including liquidity, profitability, leverage, operating and market value ratios collected from DataStream International and Stock Exchange of Thailand for three-year period between 2021 and 2023 to obtain a financial performance score using Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Methods (TOPSIS). This study also examines whether the firms can keep their ranking position throughout the three years. This could provide investors with an additional piece of information on making investment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ek-anong Tangrukwaraskul & Kiriya Kulchanarat, 0000. "Post Pandemic Digital Transformation and Comparative Analysis of ICT Firms in the Stock Exchange of Thailand using TOPSIS Technique," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 14716382, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:iefpro:14716382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/international-conference-on-economics-finance-business-lisbon/table-of-content/detail?cid=147&iid=013&rid=16382
    File Function: First version, 0000
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berna Bulgurcu, 2013. "Financial Performance Ranking of the Automotive Industry Firms in Turkey: Evidence from an Entropy-Weighted Technique," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 3(4), pages 844-851.
    2. Nazanin Vafaei & Rita A. Ribeiro & Luis M. Camarinha-Matos, 2018. "Data normalisation techniques in decision making: case study with TOPSIS method," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 19-38.
    3. Li-Chang Hsu, 2013. "Investment decision making using a combined factor analysis and entropy-based topsis model," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 448-466, June.
    4. Lee, Hsing-Chen & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2018. "Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 883-896.
    5. Feng, Cheng-Min & Wang, Rong-Tsu, 2000. "Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 133-142.
    6. Ecer, Fatih, 2021. "A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Yuxin Zhu & Dazuo Tian & Feng Yan, 2020. "Effectiveness of Entropy Weight Method in Decision-Making," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-5, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chia-Chen Yang & Shang-Ling Ou & Li-Chang Hsu, 2019. "A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Evaluating Companies’ Green Credit Rating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Mahmut Baydaş & Dragan Pamučar, 2022. "Determining Objective Characteristics of MCDM Methods under Uncertainty: An Exploration Study with Financial Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Ahmet Kaya & Dragan Pamucar & Hasan Emin Gürler & Mehmet Ozcalici, 2024. "Determining the financial performance of the firms in the Borsa Istanbul sustainability index: integrating multi criteria decision making methods with simulation," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-44, December.
    4. Bruno Ricca & Massimiliano Ferrara & Salvatore Loprevite, 2023. "Searching for an effective accounting-based score of firm performance: a comparative study between different synthesis techniques," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3575-3602, August.
    5. Prageeth Roshan Weerathunga & Chen Xiaofang & Manoj Samarathunga, 2019. "Firm-specific and Contextual Determinants of Sri Lankan Corporate Hotel Performance," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 213-224.
    6. Janis Edmunds Daugavietis & Raimonda Soloha & Elina Dace & Jelena Ziemele, 2022. "A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods for Sustainability Assessment of District Heating Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin & Firoozabadi, Bahar, 2022. "A new application of measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) in solar site location for electricity and hydrogen production: A case study in the southern clim," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    8. Satı, Zümrüt Ecevit, 2024. "Comparison of the criteria affecting the digital innovation performance of the European Union (EU) member and candidate countries with the entropy weight-TOPSIS method and investigation of its importa," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. P. R. Weerathunga & Cheng Xiaofang & W. H. M.S. Samarathunga & P. M. B. Jayathilake, 2020. "The Relative Effect of Growth of Economy, Industry Expansion, and Firm-Specific Factors on Corporate Hotel Performance in Sri Lanka," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, April.
    10. Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska & Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła & Joanna Pawłowska-Tyszko & Michał Soliwoda, 2021. "Crop Insurance, Land Productivity and the Environment: A Way forward to a Better Understanding," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Xiaosi Zhang & Jizhong Shao, 2024. "Evaluation of the Suitability of Street Vending Planning in Urban Public Space in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Mahmut BAKIR & Şahap AKAN & Kasım KIRACI & Darjan KARABASEVIC & Dragisa STANUJKIC & Gabrijela POPOVIC, 2020. "Multiple-Criteria Approach of the Operational Performance Evaluation in the Airline Industry: Evidence from the Emerging Markets," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 149-172, July.
    13. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Nock, Destenie & Baker, Erin, 2019. "Holistic multi-criteria decision analysis evaluation of sustainable electric generation portfolios: New England case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 655-673.
    15. Gürler, Hasan Emin & Özçalıcı, Mehmet & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "Determining criteria weights with genetic algorithms for multi-criteria decision making methods: The case of logistics performance index rankings of European Union countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Francis, Graham & Humphreys, Ian & Fry, Jackie, 2005. "The nature and prevalence of the use of performance measurement techniques by airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 207-217.
    17. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    18. Ezbakhe, Fatine & Pérez-Foguet, Agustí, 2021. "Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 601-613.
    19. Thanh Ngo & Kan Wai Hong Tsui, 2022. "Estimating the confidence intervals for DEA efficiency scores of Asia-Pacific airlines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3411-3434, September.
    20. Chiuling Lu & Ann Yang & Jui-Feng Huang, 2015. "Bankruptcy predictions for U.S. air carrier operations: a study of financial data," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 39(3), pages 574-589, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Entropy weight TOPSIS; ICT Sector; Financial Performance; Thailand;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • L66 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Food; Beverages; Cosmetics; Tobacco
    • C60 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iefpro:14716382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.