IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurjco/v7y2019i1d10.1007_s13675-018-0107-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formulations and algorithms for the recoverable $${\varGamma }$$ Γ -robust knapsack problem

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Büsing

    (RWTH Aachen University)

  • Sebastian Goderbauer

    (RWTH Aachen University)

  • Arie M. C. A. Koster

    (RWTH Aachen University)

  • Manuel Kutschka

    (RWTH Aachen University)

Abstract

One of the most frequently occurring substructures in integer linear programs (ILPs) is the knapsack constraint. In this paper, we study ways to deal with uncertainty in the coefficients of such constraints. We combine the budget uncertainty set of Bertsimas and Sim (Math Program Ser B 98:49–71, 2003; Oper Res 52(1):35–53, 2004) with a recovery action, i.e., in order to restore feasibility up to k items may be removed when the actual coefficients are known. We present three different approaches to formulate this recoverable robust knapsack (rrKP) as ILP, including a novel compact reformulation of quadratic size. The other two formulations have exponentially many variables and/or constraints. To keep the ILPs small in practice, we develop separation algorithms, not only for the exponential formulations, but also for the compact reformulation. An experimental comparison of six different approaches to solve the rrKP on a carefully designed set of benchmark instances reveals that a lazy constraint-and-variables approach for the compact reformulation outperforms other alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Büsing & Sebastian Goderbauer & Arie M. C. A. Koster & Manuel Kutschka, 2019. "Formulations and algorithms for the recoverable $${\varGamma }$$ Γ -robust knapsack problem," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(1), pages 15-45, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurjco:v:7:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s13675-018-0107-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s13675-018-0107-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13675-018-0107-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13675-018-0107-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduardo Álvarez-Miranda & Ivana Ljubić & S. Raghavan & Paolo Toth, 2015. "The Recoverable Robust Two-Level Network Design Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Kaparis, Konstantinos & Letchford, Adam N., 2008. "Local and global lifted cover inequalities for the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 91-103, April.
    3. Richard Bellman, 1956. "Notes on the theory of dynamic programming IV ‐ Maximization over discrete sets," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 67-70, March.
    4. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    5. Gang Yu, 1996. "On the Max-Min 0-1 Knapsack Problem with Robust Optimization Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 407-415, April.
    6. Aissi, Hassene & Bazgan, Cristina & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2009. "Min-max and min-max regret versions of combinatorial optimization problems: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 427-438, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabrice Talla Nobibon & Roel Leus, 2014. "Complexity Results and Exact Algorithms for Robust Knapsack Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 533-552, May.
    2. Fabio Furini & Manuel Iori & Silvano Martello & Mutsunori Yagiura, 2015. "Heuristic and Exact Algorithms for the Interval Min–Max Regret Knapsack Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 392-405, May.
    3. Chassein, André & Dokka, Trivikram & Goerigk, Marc, 2019. "Algorithms and uncertainty sets for data-driven robust shortest path problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 671-686.
    4. Marc Goerigk & Adam Kasperski & Paweł Zieliński, 2022. "Robust two-stage combinatorial optimization problems under convex second-stage cost uncertainty," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 497-527, April.
    5. Alireza Amirteimoori & Simin Masrouri, 2021. "DEA-based competition strategy in the presence of undesirable products: An application to paper mills," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(2), pages 5-21.
    6. Cohen, Izack & Postek, Krzysztof & Shtern, Shimrit, 2023. "An adaptive robust optimization model for parallel machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 83-104.
    7. Chassein, André & Goerigk, Marc, 2018. "Variable-sized uncertainty and inverse problems in robust optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 17-28.
    8. Detienne, Boris & Lefebvre, Henri & Malaguti, Enrico & Monaci, Michele, 2024. "Adjustable robust optimization with objective uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 373-384.
    9. Roos, Ernst & den Hertog, Dick, 2019. "Reducing conservatism in robust optimization," Other publications TiSEM ad0238cd-de7a-4366-b487-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Amadeu A. Coco & Andréa Cynthia Santos & Thiago F. Noronha, 2022. "Robust min-max regret covering problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 83(1), pages 111-141, September.
    11. Marc Goerigk & Ismaila Abderhamane Ndiaye, 2016. "Robust flows with losses and improvability in evacuation planning," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(3), pages 241-270, September.
    12. Georgios P. Trachanas & Aikaterini Forouli & Nikolaos Gkonis & Haris Doukas, 2020. "Hedging uncertainty in energy efficiency strategies: a minimax regret analysis," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2229-2244, December.
    13. Luo, Chunling & Tan, Chin Hon & Liu, Xiao, 2020. "Maximum excess dominance: Identifying impractical solutions in linear problems with interval coefficients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 660-676.
    14. Jannis Kurtz, 2018. "Robust combinatorial optimization under budgeted–ellipsoidal uncertainty," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(4), pages 315-337, December.
    15. Chassein, André & Goerigk, Marc & Kasperski, Adam & Zieliński, Paweł, 2018. "On recoverable and two-stage robust selection problems with budgeted uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 423-436.
    16. Artur Alves Pessoa & Michael Poss & Ruslan Sadykov & François Vanderbeck, 2021. "Branch-Cut-and-Price for the Robust Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem with Knapsack Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 739-754, May.
    17. Raith, Andrea & Schmidt, Marie & Schöbel, Anita & Thom, Lisa, 2018. "Multi-objective minmax robust combinatorial optimization with cardinality-constrained uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 628-642.
    18. Pätzold, Julius & Schöbel, Anita, 2020. "Approximate cutting plane approaches for exact solutions to robust optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 20-30.
    19. Tan Wang & Genaro Gutierrez, 2022. "Robust Product Line Design by Protecting the Downside While Minding the Upside," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 194-217, January.
    20. Chassein, André & Goerigk, Marc, 2017. "Minmax regret combinatorial optimization problems with ellipsoidal uncertainty sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 58-69.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurjco:v:7:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s13675-018-0107-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.