IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v43y2023i2d10.1007_s10669-022-09871-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Importance of rural tourist attractions in Riobamba Canton, Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Danny Daniel Castillo Vizuete

    (Faculty of Natural Resources, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH))

  • Alex Vinicio Gavilanes Montoya

    (Faculty of Natural Resources, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH))

  • Gabriela Estefanía Román Santamaría

    (Ecuador & Research Institute: IDI–ESPOCH)

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the most important rural tourist attractions of the rural parishes of the Riobamba canton and determine the preferences of tourists regarding rural tourism destinations. Therefore, this research was developed in the 11 parishes of the Riobamba canton, in the province of Chimborazo, Ecuador. The field phase was carried out in the Chimborazo Fauna Reserve because the location is related to the object of the study, which was the tourist cohort attending to the area. The administration of all the questionnaires to more than 700 respondents was part of the data collection activity, which resulted in a computed sample of 500 completed questionnaires. For the visual perception section, a set of 11 photographs were extracted which were describing the most visited tourist attractions in 11 rural parishes of the Riobamba Canton and shown to the respondents The study result shows that natural tourist attractions such as the Chimborazo volcano and Altar volcano were the best rated, while cultural attractions such as “El Churo” viewpoint and “Virgen de las Nieves” church were rated with the lowest score by respondents. The result reveals that tourists are concerned about the security and safety of the destination, the accommodation price, and the variety of services that play a vital role in selecting a tourist destination. The finding shows that entertainment facilities, adventure facilities, hiking, and cultural attractions are considered to be important aspects for all tourists. Finally, these evaluations may be useful for tourists, the local population, and government entities in generating added value on the tourist attractions of greater importance while improving those of lesser importance.

Suggested Citation

  • Danny Daniel Castillo Vizuete & Alex Vinicio Gavilanes Montoya & Gabriela Estefanía Román Santamaría, 2023. "Evaluation of the Importance of rural tourist attractions in Riobamba Canton, Ecuador," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 200-210, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:43:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-022-09871-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-022-09871-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-022-09871-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-022-09871-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yurii Kyrylov & Viktoriia Hranovska & Viktoriia Boiko & Aleksy Kwilinski & Liudmyla Boiko, 2020. "International Tourism Development in the Context of Increasing Globalization Risks: On the Example of Ukraine’s Integration into the Global Tourism Industry," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Danny Daniel Castillo Vizuete & Alex Vinicio Gavilanes Montoya & Eduardo Antonio Muñoz Jácome & Carlos Renato Chávez Velásquez & Stelian Alexandru Borz, 2021. "An Evaluation of the Importance of Smart Tourism Tools in the Riobamba Canton, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Joyeeta Gupta & Courtney Vegelin, 2016. "Sustainable development goals and inclusive development," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 433-448, June.
    4. Faiza Manzoor & Longbao Wei & Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Zia ul Haq & Hafiz ur Rehman, 2019. "The Contribution of Sustainable Tourism to Economic Growth and Employment in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Andra Poruțiu & Olivia Paula Tirpe & Camelia Oroian & Valentin C. Mihai & Gabriela O. Chiciudean & Daniel I. Chiciudean & Crina Poruțiu, 2021. "Analysis on Tourists’ Preferences for Rural Tourism Destinations in Romania," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Juutinen, Artti & Mitani, Yohei & Mäntymaa, Erkki & Shoji, Yasushi & Siikamäki, Pirkko & Svento, Rauli, 2011. "Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: A choice experiment application," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1231-1239, April.
    7. Aguado, Mateo & González, José A. & Bellott, Kr'sna & López-Santiago, César & Montes, Carlos, 2018. "Exploring subjective well-being and ecosystem services perception along a rural–urban gradient in the high Andes of Ecuador," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 1-10.
    8. Tyrväinen, Liisa & Mäntymaa, Erkki & Ovaskainen, Ville, 2014. "Demand for enhanced forest amenities in private lands: The case of the Ruka-Kuusamo tourism area, Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 4-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juutinen, Artti & Kosenius, Anna-Kaisa & Ovaskainen, Ville, 2014. "Estimating the benefits of recreation-oriented management in state-owned commercial forests in Finland: A choice experiment," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 396-412.
    2. Kelley, Hugh & van Rensburg, Thomas M. & Jeserich, Nadine, 2016. "Determinants of demand for recreational walking trails in Ireland," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 173-186.
    3. Mäntymaa, Erkki & Tyrväinen, Liisa & Juutinen, Artti & Kurttila, Mikko, 2021. "Importance of forest landscape quality for companies operating in nature tourism areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Kularatne, Thamarasi & Wilson, Clevo & Lee, Boon & Hoang, Viet-Ngu, 2021. "Tourists’ before and after experience valuations: A unique choice experiment with policy implications for the nature-based tourism industry," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 529-543.
    5. Kaffashi, Sara & Yacob, Mohd Rusli & Clark, Maynard S. & Radam, Alias & Mamat, Mohd Farid, 2015. "Exploring visitors' willingness to pay to generate revenues for managing the National Elephant Conservation Center in Malaysia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 9-19.
    6. Imamura, Kohei & Managi, Shunsuke & Saito, Shoichi & Nakashizuka, Tohru, 2017. "Abandoned forest ecosystem: Implications for Japan's Oak Wilt disease," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 56-61.
    7. Valentin C. Mihai & Diana E. Dumitras & Camelia Oroian & Gabriela O. Chiciudean & Felix H. Arion & Iulia Cristina Mureșan, 2023. "Exploring the Factors Involved in Tourists’ Decision-Making and Determinants of Length of Stay," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Han-Shen Chen, 2020. "The Construction and Validation of a Sustainable Tourism Development Evaluation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Peng Zeng & Sihui Wu & Zongyao Sun & Yujia Zhu & Yuqi Chen & Zhi Qiao & Liangwa Cai, 2021. "Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Joyeeta Gupta & Aarti Gupta & Courtney Vegelin, 2022. "Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 393-409, June.
    11. Han-Shen Chen & Chu-Wei Chen, 2019. "Economic Valuation of Green Island, Taiwan: A Choice Experiment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Joyeeta Gupta & Louis Lebel, 0. "Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    13. Gangwei Cai & Baoping Zou & Xiaoting Chi & Xincheng He & Yuang Guo & Wen Jiang & Qian Wu & Yujin Zhang & Yanna Zhou, 2023. "Neighborhood Spatio-Temporal Impacts of SDG 8.9: The Case of Urban and Rural Exhibition-Driven Tourism by Multiple Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-37, January.
    14. Agni Kalfagianni & Oran R. Young, 2022. "The politics of multilateral environmental agreements lessons from 20 years of INEA," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 245-262, June.
    15. Freddie Sayi Siangulube & Mirjam A. F. Ros-Tonen & James Reed & Eric Rega Christophe Bayala & Terry Sunderland, 2023. "Spatial Tools for Inclusive Landscape Governance: Negotiating Land Use, Land-Cover Change, and Future Landscape Scenarios in Two Multistakeholder Platforms in Zambia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Yuan, Mei-Hua & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2020. "Developing indicators for the monitoring of the sustainability of food, energy, and water," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Suwan Lu & Guobin Fang & Mingtao Zhao, 2023. "Towards Inclusive Growth: Perspective of Regional Spatial Correlation Network in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Jenica Călina & Aurel Călina & Tiberiu Iancu & Gheorghe Marian Vangu, 2022. "Research on the Use of Aerial Scanning and Gis in the Design of Sustainable Agricultural Production Extension Works in an Agritourist Farm in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-32, October.
    19. Henryk Dźwigoł, 2021. "The Uncertainty Factor in the Market Economic System: The Microeconomic Aspect of Sustainable Development," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 4(1), pages 98-117, January.
    20. Dzintra Atstāja & Edmira Cakrani, 2024. "Impact of Climate Change on International Tourism Evidence from Baltic Sea Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:43:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-022-09871-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.