IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9436-d619643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of the Importance of Smart Tourism Tools in the Riobamba Canton, Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Danny Daniel Castillo Vizuete

    (Faculty of Natural Resources, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Panamericana Sur, Km 1 ½, Riobamba EC-060155, Ecuador)

  • Alex Vinicio Gavilanes Montoya

    (Faculty of Natural Resources, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Panamericana Sur, Km 1 ½, Riobamba EC-060155, Ecuador)

  • Eduardo Antonio Muñoz Jácome

    (Faculty of Natural Resources, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Panamericana Sur, Km 1 ½, Riobamba EC-060155, Ecuador)

  • Carlos Renato Chávez Velásquez

    (Faculty of Natural Resources, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Panamericana Sur, Km 1 ½, Riobamba EC-060155, Ecuador)

  • Stelian Alexandru Borz

    (Department of Forest Engineering, Forest Management Planning and Terrestrial Measurements, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, Şirul Beethoven 1, 500123 Brasov, Romania)

Abstract

The use of the state-of-art information and communication technology has been found to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of the tourism industry and many countries have chosen to implement smart tourism tools as a strategy to adapt to the continuously changing profile of tourists. While there are many tools which could be implemented for such endeavors, the evaluation of the tourist preferences in relation to their use and importance needs to be done so as to ensure at least the sustainability of investments and of the local development strategies. The Chimborazo Fauna Reserve (canton of Riobamba, Ecuador) was selected for the application of a questionnaire survey to evaluate the importance of 38 smart tourism tools based on the experience of Ecuadorian and international tourists with them. The survey considered more than 700 respondents and 500 valid questionnaires were retained for analysis which was done mainly by developing distributions of the relative frequencies of ratings given on a 5-point Likert scale and by a correspondence analysis at the level of two subsamples: national and international tourists. There were obvious differences between these two groups in terms of importance placed on the smart tourism tools. The first difference was that the Ecuadorian tourists found less utility in the smart tools as compared to the international tourists. The second difference was that the best rated tools in terms of importance were different among the two groups, with the international tourists placing, for instance, more importance on safety-related tools. Correspondence analysis has shown the similarities of profiles and data association, being a useful tool of associating the ratings to the evaluated tools. The knowledge gained by the survey may be helpful in supporting the development of local tourist strategies, providing at the same time valuable data to support preference comparisons with other tourist destinations and countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Danny Daniel Castillo Vizuete & Alex Vinicio Gavilanes Montoya & Eduardo Antonio Muñoz Jácome & Carlos Renato Chávez Velásquez & Stelian Alexandru Borz, 2021. "An Evaluation of the Importance of Smart Tourism Tools in the Riobamba Canton, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9436-:d:619643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9436/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Zejda & Josef Zelenka, 2019. "The Concept of Comprehensive Tracking Software to Support Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Daniela Gračan & Zrinka Zadel & Damir Pavlović, 2021. "Management Of Visitor Satisfaction By Using Mobile Digital Tools And Services To Create Concept Of Smart Destination," Ekonomski pregled, Hrvatsko društvo ekonomista (Croatian Society of Economists), vol. 72(2), pages 185-198.
    3. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Yuwen Zhang, 2020. "The Influence of Smart Technologies on Customer Journey in Tourist Attractions within the Smart Tourism Management Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Wang, Xia & Li, Xiang (Robert) & Zhen, Feng & Zhang, JinHe, 2016. "How smart is your tourist attraction?: Measuring tourist preferences of smart tourism attractions via a FCEM-AHP and IPA approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 309-320.
    5. Xiang, Zheng & Stienmetz, Jason & Fesenmaier, Daniel R., 2021. "Smart Tourism Design: Launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on designing tourism places," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danny Daniel Castillo Vizuete & Alex Vinicio Gavilanes Montoya & Gabriela Estefanía Román Santamaría, 2023. "Evaluation of the Importance of rural tourist attractions in Riobamba Canton, Ecuador," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 200-210, June.
    2. Vitor Rodrigues & Celeste Eusébio & Zélia Breda, 2023. "Enhancing sustainable development through tourism digitalisation: a systematic literature review," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 13-45, March.
    3. Chris Roberts & Joel Reynolds & Mary Jo Dolasinski, 2022. "Meta-Analysis of Tourism Sustainability Research: 2019–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bahram Zikirya & Chunshan Zhou, 2023. "Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of High-Level Tourist Attractions in China: A Case Study of 9296 A-Level Tourist Attractions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Assumpció Huertas & Antonio Moreno & Jordi Pascual, 2021. "Place Branding for Smart Cities and Smart Tourism Destinations: Do They Communicate Their Smartness?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Mateusz Naramski, 2020. "The Application of ICT and Smart Technologies in Polish Museums—Towards Smart Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Chung-Ming Chuang, 2023. "The conceptualization of smart tourism service platforms on tourist value co-creation behaviours: an integrative perspective of smart tourism services," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Yuejiao Wang & Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Li Zhang, 2020. "Suggesting a Framework for Performance Evaluation of Tourist Attractions: A Balance Score Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Junjie Gao & Younghwan Pan, 2022. "Evaluating Influencing Factors of Tourists’ Experiences with Smart Tour Guide System: A Mixed Method Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Hugo Padrón-Ávila & Raúl Hernández-Martín, 2019. "Preventing Overtourism by Identifying the Determinants of Tourists’ Choice of Attractions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Kramat Hussain & Huaping Sun & Muhammad Ramzan & Shahid Mahmood & Muhammad Zubair Saeed, 2024. "Interpretive Structural Modeling of Barriers to Sustainable Tourism Development: A Developing Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-32, June.
    9. Inessa Tyan & Mariemma I. Yagüe & Antonio Guevara-Plaza, 2020. "Blockchain Technology for Smart Tourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Francisco E. Cabrera & Manuel Amaya & Gustavo Fabián Vaccaro Witt & José Ignacio Peláez, 2019. "Pairwise Voting to Rank Touristic Destinations Based on Preference Valuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-13, October.
    11. Chi Yunxian & Li Renjie & Zhao Shuliang & Guo Fenghua, 2020. "Measuring multi-spatiotemporal scale tourist destination popularity based on text granular computing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-33, April.
    12. Fang-Wu Tung, 2021. "Rediscovering Herb Lane: Application of Design Thinking to Enhance Visitor Experience in a Traditional Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Kamila Štekerová & Josef Zelenka & Milan Kořínek, 2022. "Agent-Based Modelling in Visitor Management of Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Tomašević Ivana & Đurović Sandra & Abramović Nikola, 2019. "Analysis of the Use of Digital Technologies in Montenegro’s Tourist offer on the Example of a Hotels in Bar," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 119-125, June.
    15. Yuwen Zhang & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2022. "Investigating the Impact of Smart Tourism Technologies on Tourists’ Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Xiaoping Gu & Carter A. Hunt & Xiang Jia & Lijun Niu, 2022. "Evaluating Nature-Based Tourism Destination Attractiveness with a Fuzzy-AHP Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Uglješa Stankov & Ulrike Gretzel & Miroslav D. Vujičić & Vanja Pavluković & Tamara Jovanović & Milica Solarević & Marija Cimbaljević, 2022. "The pandemic of loneliness: designing smart tourism for combating loneliness," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 439-455, December.
    18. Fotiadis, Anestis K. & Stylos, Nikolaos, 2017. "The effects of online social networking on retail consumer dynamics in the attractions industry: The case of ‘E-da’ theme park, Taiwan," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 283-294.
    19. Dejan Križaj, 2020. "Integration of Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Innovation in Tourism: The QCII Model," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 13(1), pages 97-110.
    20. Pedro Cuesta-Valiño & Fadoua Bolifa & Estela Núñez-Barriopedro, 2020. "Sustainable, Smart and Muslim-Friendly Tourist Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9436-:d:619643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.