IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i8d10.1007_s10668-023-03518-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping the climate change attitude: careless or care less?

Author

Listed:
  • Durdana Ovais

    (BSSS Institute of Advanced Studies)

  • Richi Simon

    (Bhopal School of Social Sciences)

  • Nilofar Kadeer

    (Bhopal School of Social Sciences)

Abstract

Is it carelessness regarding climate change knowledge or self-interested ignorance? With the consequences of climate change becoming a global issue, socio-psychological analysis becomes imperative to bring a change in attitude. The study maps the relationship between information sources, self-concern and the concern for climate change. The effect of denial as a mediating variable is investigated between information sources, self-concerns, and the perception of climate change. For this investigation, positivism was used. An exploratory descriptive study examined how information sources, self-concerns, denial, age, gender, qualification, and occupation affect climate change perspective. In July and August 2021, Google Forms were used to acquire a non-probability sample of 474 Indians. Convenience, judgement, and snowballing were employed to get the sample size. Smart PLS 3.3.2 (Smart PLS-SEM) employed partial least square–structural equation modelling. PLS-SEM confirmed the model's factors. According to the results denial completely mediates the association between self-concern and climate change perception, but not between information sources and perception of climate change. The research provides evidence that it is the care less attitude towards the environment and especially climate change that is hindering the change in behaviour of individuals. The research gives an interesting insight into the psychology of individuals. This emerging literature is particularly beneficial to understanding the reason behind failed attempts by environmentalists and scientists to bring a change in the behaviour of people. The research provides a crucial base for the direction of future efforts. As the denial of climate change is a defence strategy, the study suggests that awareness programmes should focus on this fact in order to devise approaches to bring about the desired shift in attitude and behaviour. Moreover, because self-concern increases climate change denial, narratives of policy efforts may emphasize the benefits to individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Durdana Ovais & Richi Simon & Nilofar Kadeer, 2024. "Mapping the climate change attitude: careless or care less?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21053-21072, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03518-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03518-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03518-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03518-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Donner & Jeremy McDaniels, 2013. "The influence of national temperature fluctuations on opinions about climate change in the U.S. since 1990," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 537-550, June.
    2. Ringle, Christian M. & Götz, Oliver & Wetzels, Martin & Wilson, Bradley, 2009. "On the Use of Formative Measurement Specifications in Structural Equation Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study to Compare Covariance-Based and Partial Least Squares Model Estimation Methodologies," MPRA Paper 15390, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    4. Kathryn Stevenson & M. Peterson & Howard Bondell & Susan Moore & Sarah Carrier, 2014. "Overcoming skepticism with education: interacting influences of worldview and climate change knowledge on perceived climate change risk among adolescents," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 293-304, October.
    5. Robert E. O'Connor & Richard J. Bard & Ann Fisher, 1999. "Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 461-471, June.
    6. Hair, Joe F. & Howard, Matt C. & Nitzl, Christian, 2020. "Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-110.
    7. Matthew J. Hornsey & Emily A. Harris & Paul G. Bain & Kelly S. Fielding, 2016. "Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(6), pages 622-626, June.
    8. Muhammad Ishaq-ur Rahman, 2013. "Climate Change: a Theoretical Review," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13.
    9. J. Arbuckle & Lois Morton & Jon Hobbs, 2013. "Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: Evidence from Iowa," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 551-563, June.
    10. Anne M. van Valkengoed & Linda Steg, 2019. "Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(2), pages 158-163, February.
    11. Mullins, Willard A., 1972. "On the Concept of Ideology in Political Science," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 66(2), pages 498-510, June.
    12. Aronson, E. & Fried, C. & Stone, J., 1991. "Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 81(12), pages 1636-1638.
    13. Christina Tobler & Vivianne Visschers & Michael Siegrist, 2012. "Consumers’ knowledge about climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 189-209, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xueqi Wang & Jin Chen, 2022. "Fear emotion reduces reported mitigation behavior in adolescents subject to climate change education," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Tuyen Tiet & Nguyen To-The & Tuan Nguyen-Anh, 2022. "Farmers’ behaviors and attitudes toward climate change adaptation: evidence from Vietnamese smallholder farmers," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14235-14260, December.
    3. Veysel Yilmaz & Pınar Guleç & Erkan Ari, 2023. "Impact of climate change information of university students in Turkey on responsibility and environmental behavior through awareness and perceived risk," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 7281-7297, July.
    4. Ting Liu & Nick Shryane & Mark Elliot, 2022. "Attitudes to climate change risk: classification of and transitions in the UK population between 2012 and 2020," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. D. Liliana González-Hernández & Raúl A. Aguirre-Gamboa & Erik W. Meijles, 2023. "The role of climate change perceptions and sociodemographics on reported mitigation efforts and performance among households in northeastern Mexico," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1853-1875, February.
    6. Adrian Brügger & Moritz Gubler & Katharine Steentjes & Stuart B. Capstick, 2020. "Social Identity and Risk Perception Explain Participation in the Swiss Youth Climate Strikes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Shelley Boulianne & Mireille Lalancette & David Ilkiw, 2020. "“School Strike 4 Climate”: Social Media and the International Youth Protest on Climate Change," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 208-218.
    8. Abhijit Guha & Timna Bressgott & Dhruv Grewal & Dominik Mahr & Martin Wetzels & Elisa Schweiger, 2023. "How artificiality and intelligence affect voice assistant evaluations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 843-866, July.
    9. Philippe Odou & Marie Schill, 2020. "How anticipated emotions shape behavioral intentions to fight climate change," Post-Print hal-02929920, HAL.
    10. Marcus Dejardin & Mario L. Raposo & João J. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Pedro M. Veiga & Luís Farinha, 2023. "The impact of dynamic capabilities on SME performance during COVID-19," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1703-1729, July.
    11. Hayam Elshirbiny & Wokje Abrahamse, 2020. "Public risk perception of climate change in Egypt: a mixed methods study of predictors and implications," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(3), pages 242-254, September.
    12. Mason, Charles F. & Wilmot, Neil A., 2024. "On climate fat tails and politics," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Shah Md Atiqul Haq & Khandaker Jafor Ahmed, 2020. "Perceptions about climate change among university students in Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3683-3713, September.
    14. Ajay S. Singh & Sarah P. Church & Layla Dang & Erin P. Hennes & Linda S. Prokopy, 2020. "Does climate change framing matter? Evidence from an experiment of crop advisors in the Midwestern United States," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1031-1044, October.
    15. Stephen T. Homer, 2023. "Perceptions of smart sustainable cities: a scale development study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3363-3388, August.
    16. Abdullah Tarinc & Gozde Seval Ergun & Arif Aytekin & Ali Keles & Ozlem Ozbek & Huseyin Keles & Ozgur Yayla, 2023. "Effect of Climate Change Belief and the New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) on Eco-Tourism Attitudes of Tourists: Moderator Role of Green Self-Identity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-27, March.
    17. Laura S. Loy & Karen R. S. Hamann & Gerhard Reese, 2020. "Navigating through the jungle of information. Informational self-efficacy predicts climate change-related media exposure, knowledge, and behaviour," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(4), pages 2097-2116, December.
    18. Odou, Philippe & Schill, Marie, 2020. "How anticipated emotions shape behavioral intentions to fight climate change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 243-253.
    19. Gabriele Prati & Iana Tzankova & Cinzia Albanesi & Elvira Cicognani, 2022. "Longitudinal Predictors of Perceived Climate Change Importance and Worry among Italian Youths: A Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Ahmad Faiz Yaakob & Hazlina Mohd Padil & Aida Abdullah & Shahidah Abdul Razak & Asri Salleh, 2024. "An Assessment of Determinants of Political Interests among University Students: A Case Study of Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 1478-1488, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03518-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.