IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v27y2022i8d10.1007_s11027-022-10029-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-making process related to climate change mitigation among married-couple households: A case study of Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Li-San Hung

    (National Taiwan Normal University)

  • Chongming Wang

    (Jacksonville State University)

Abstract

Carbon dioxide emissions from households are substantial. Therefore, mitigating climate change requires household-level behavioral changes. However, mitigation behaviors have predominantly been examined at the individual level. Fewer studies have even addressed intrahousehold interactions that drive decision-making in relation to household climate change mitigation behaviors. Therefore, this study investigated the relative influence exerted by husbands and wives on the four-stage process of decision-making (i.e., problem initiation, information search and evaluation, final decisions, and practice) regarding household climate change mitigation behaviors. The sample comprised 152 married heterosexual couples living in Taipei City, Taiwan. The results revealed that the majority of surveyed couples employed joint decision-making throughout the four stages, and the percentage of joint decisions made gradually increased from problem initiation (61%) through to practice (82%). By contrast, the percentage of individual decisions gradually decreased from problem initiation (38%) through to practice (17%). Wives had considerably more influence than husbands across the four stages, and the dominance of wives in decision-making was related to wives’ characteristics such as educational attainment, gender roles, environmental attitudes, and self-efficacy, as well as husbands’ characteristics such as educational attainment and environmental attitudes. However, there was no difference between husbands and wives in the level of engagement in the three kinds of mitigation behaviors and four types of decision-making influences across the four stages. These results will help inform policies about communicating climate change information and promoting household mitigation activities to limit climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Li-San Hung & Chongming Wang, 2022. "Decision-making process related to climate change mitigation among married-couple households: A case study of Taiwan," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:27:y:2022:i:8:d:10.1007_s11027-022-10029-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-022-10029-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-022-10029-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-022-10029-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cho, Yoon-Na & Thyroff, Anastasia & Rapert, Molly I. & Park, Seong-Yeon & Lee, Hyun Ju, 2013. "To be or not to be green: Exploring individualism and collectivism as antecedents of environmental behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1052-1059.
    2. Carlsson-Kanyama, Annika & Linden, Anna-Lisa, 2007. "Energy efficiency in residences--Challenges for women and men in the North," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 2163-2172, April.
    3. Davis, Harry L, 1976. "Decision Making within the Household," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(4), pages 241-260, March.
    4. Anna Scott & Caroline Oates & William Young, 2015. "A Conceptual Framework of the Adoption and Practice of Environmental Actions in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Li-San Hung & Mucahid Mustafa Bayrak, 2020. "Comparing the effects of climate change labelling on reactions of the Taiwanese public," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-6, December.
    6. Robert E. O'Connor & Richard J. Bard & Ann Fisher, 1999. "Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 461-471, June.
    7. Robert E. O'Connor & Richard J. Bord & Brent Yarnal & Nancy Wiefek, 2002. "Who Wants to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 83(1), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Stephanie Toole & Natascha Klocker & Lesley Head, 2016. "Re-thinking climate change adaptation and capacities at the household scale," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 203-209, March.
    9. Davis, Harry L & Rigaux, Benny P, 1974. "Perception of Marital Roles in Decision Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 1(1), pages 51-62, June.
    10. Martin, M. & Williams, I.D. & Clark, M., 2006. "Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 357-395.
    11. J. Arbuckle & Lois Morton & Jon Hobbs, 2013. "Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: Evidence from Iowa," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 551-563, June.
    12. Samuel Brody & Himanshu Grover & Arnold Vedlitz, 2012. "Examining the willingness of Americans to alter behaviour to mitigate climate change," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Stephanie Toole & Natascha Klocker & Lesley Head, 2016. "Re-thinking climate change adaptation and capacities at the household scale," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 203-209, March.
    14. Elrick-Barr, Carmen E. & Smith, Timothy F. & Preston, Benjamin L. & Thomsen, Dana C. & Baum, Scott, 2016. "How are coastal households responding to climate change?," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 177-186.
    15. Li-San Hung, 2017. "Married couples’ decision-making about household natural hazard preparedness: a case study of hurricane hazards in Sarasota County, Florida," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 1057-1081, June.
    16. Martina Schäfer & Melanie Jaeger-Erben & Sebastian Bamberg, 2012. "Life Events as Windows of Opportunity for Changing Towards Sustainable Consumption Patterns?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 65-84, March.
    17. Belch, George E. & Belch, Michael A. & Ceresino, Gayle, 1985. "Parental and teenage child influences in family decision making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 163-176, April.
    18. Danielle F. Lawson & Kathryn T. Stevenson & M. Nils Peterson & Sarah J. Carrier & Renee L. Strnad & Erin Seekamp, 2019. "Children can foster climate change concern among their parents," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(6), pages 458-462, June.
    19. Wang, Qunwei & Hang, Ye & Zhou, P. & Wang, Yizhong, 2016. "Decoupling and attribution analysis of industrial carbon emissions in Taiwan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 728-738.
    20. W. Neil Adger & Jon Barnett & Katrina Brown & Nadine Marshall & Karen O'Brien, 2013. "Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(2), pages 112-117, February.
    21. William Young & Kumju Hwang & Seonaidh McDonald & Caroline J. Oates, 2010. "Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 20-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Scott & Caroline Oates & William Young, 2015. "A Conceptual Framework of the Adoption and Practice of Environmental Actions in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Lien, Nguyen Huong & Westberg, Kate & Stavros, Constantino & Robinson, Linda J., 2018. "Family decision-making in an emerging market: Tensions with tradition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 479-489.
    3. Li-San Hung, 2017. "Married couples’ decision-making about household natural hazard preparedness: a case study of hurricane hazards in Sarasota County, Florida," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 1057-1081, June.
    4. Jones, Lindsey & d'Errico, Marco, 2019. "Whose resilience matters? Like-for-like comparison of objective and subjective evaluations of resilience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Iwowari Beatrice Dute, 2020. "The Influence of Cross-Cultural Language and Background on Climate Change Perception – An Empirical Investigation," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(9), pages 50-55, September.
    6. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Mandravickaitė, Justina & Bernatonienė, Jurga, 2016. "Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 38-46.
    7. Ximena Garcia-Rada & Lalin Anik & Dan Ariely, 2019. "Consuming together (versus separately) makes the heart grow fonder," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 27-43, March.
    8. Stephen Ntuara Kiriinya, 2014. "Determinants of Children's Influence on Family Purchase Decisions in Kenya," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(7), pages 325-339, July.
    9. Pavleen Kaur & Raghbir Singh, 2005. "Conflict Resolution in Urban and Rural Families: A Factor Analytical Approach," Vision, , vol. 9(1), pages 59-67, January.
    10. Paul M. Kellstedt & Sammy Zahran & Arnold Vedlitz, 2008. "Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 113-126, February.
    11. D. Liliana González-Hernández & Raúl A. Aguirre-Gamboa & Erik W. Meijles, 2023. "The role of climate change perceptions and sociodemographics on reported mitigation efforts and performance among households in northeastern Mexico," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1853-1875, February.
    12. Vytautas Dikcius & Anahit Armenakyan & Sigitas Urbonavicius & Gintare Jonyniene & Justina Gineikiene, 2014. "The Influence Of Children On Family Purchasing In Lithuania And Azerbaijan," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 5(2).
    13. Yektansani, Kiana & Azizi, SeyedSoroosh, 2021. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Consumers’ Environmental Attitudes and Beliefs," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313902, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Alberini, Anna & Ščasný, Milan & Bigano, Andrea, 2018. "Policy- v. individual heterogeneity in the benefits of climate change mitigation: Evidence from a stated-preference survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 565-575.
    15. Zhang, Junyi & Kuwano, Masashi & Lee, Backjin & Fujiwara, Akimasa, 2009. "Modeling household discrete choice behavior incorporating heterogeneous group decision-making mechanisms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 230-250, February.
    16. Jaeyoung Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2022. "Does Political Participation Strengthen the Relationship between Civic Morality and Environmentally Friendly Attitudes? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Sarah-Louise Ruder & Sophia Rose Sanniti, 2019. "Transcending the Learned Ignorance of Predatory Ontologies: A Research Agenda for an Ecofeminist-Informed Ecological Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, March.
    18. Ariel Malka & Jon A. Krosnick & Gary Langer, 2009. "The Association of Knowledge with Concern About Global Warming: Trusted Information Sources Shape Public Thinking," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 633-647, May.
    19. Li-San Hung, 2019. "Comparing spousal agreement on perceived responsibility for household natural hazard preparedness to actual behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, August.
    20. D. Liliana González-Hernández & Erik W. Meijles & Frank Vanclay, 2019. "Household Barriers to Climate Change Action: Perspectives from Nuevo Leon, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:27:y:2022:i:8:d:10.1007_s11027-022-10029-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.