IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i10d10.1007_s10668-023-03752-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental sustainability assessment of gasoline and methanol blended smart fuel for reduced emission formation

Author

Listed:
  • Swagatika Biswal

    (Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology)

  • Sudhansu Ranjan Das

    (Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology)

  • Nutan Saha

    (Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology)

  • Prakash Chandra Mishra

    (Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology
    Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology
    Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology)

Abstract

The replacement of petroleum gasoline with alternative fuels is a significant concern for all stakeholders in the energy field. This arises due to various factors, including the rise in petroleum fuel prices, the environmental risks associated with engine exhaust emissions, the depletion of fossil fuel resources, the impacts of global warming, and overall energy-related concerns. Fossil fuel has higher order emission formation compared to recently developed smart fuels may be due to carbon removal through blending from newly formed fuel prior to combustion. This innovative research addresses the life cycle environment sustainability assessment and analyses the effect of gasoline methanol blended on various exhaust gas emissions (CO, CO2, NOx and HC) of single cylinder gasoline engine under various operating conditions. The emission level was assessed by mounting the engine on a specialized engine test bed equipped with an eddy current dynamometer capable of precisely controlling the engine's speed and torque. This study also proposes a decision-making multiple response optimization approach to mitigate the automotive exhaust gas emissions, which will be a way forward in blend assessment for fossil fuel replacement. Later, a comprehensive sustainability analysis was performed through three different life cycle assessment (LCA) methods such as ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (I), Selected LCI results and Selected LCI results additional in order to assess the environmental feasibility of various blended proportion of methanol in gasoline fuel. The impact indicators of sustainability results are extremely less and do not possess any harm to entire ecosystem for the smart fuel exchange. The blend of 15% (B15) methanol with gasoline exhibited a better alternative behaviour in terms of fuel properties, engine emission compared to pure gasoline. Desirability function analysis proposed the best optimum conditions to minimize the exhaust emission of an unmodified gasoline engine at percentage of carbon removal (i.e. volume percentage of methanol in gasoline) of 12%, braking torque of 2 N m, and engine speed of 500 rpm. The optimum value of automotive emissions (CO, CO2, NOx) gases is 1.08328, 4.08668, and 11.2769 gm/kWh, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Swagatika Biswal & Sudhansu Ranjan Das & Nutan Saha & Prakash Chandra Mishra, 2024. "Environmental sustainability assessment of gasoline and methanol blended smart fuel for reduced emission formation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26753-26784, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03752-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03752-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03752-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03752-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prakash Chandra Mishra & Anand Gupta & Saikat Samanta & Rihana B. Ishaq & Fuad Khoshnaw, 2022. "Framework for Energy-Averaged Emission Mitigation Technique Adopting Gasoline-Methanol Blend Replacement and Piston Design Exchange," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Troy R. Hawkins & Bhawna Singh & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez & Anders Hammer Strømman, 2013. "Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(1), pages 53-64, February.
    3. Nuri Cihat Onat & Murat Kucukvar & Omer Tatari, 2014. "Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Alternative Passenger Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-38, December.
    4. Najmul Hoque & Wahidul Biswas & Ilyas Mazhar & Ian Howard, 2020. "Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Alternative Energy Sources for the Western Australian Transport Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-33, July.
    5. Gravalos, I. & Moshou, D. & Gialamas, Th. & Xyradakis, P. & Kateris, D. & Tsiropoulos, Z., 2013. "Emissions characteristics of spark ignition engine operating on lower–higher molecular mass alcohol blended gasoline fuels," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 27-32.
    6. Lebunu Hewage Udara Willhelm Abeydeera & Jayantha Wadu Mesthrige & Tharushi Imalka Samarasinghalage, 2019. "Global Research on Carbon Emissions: A Scientometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Wang, Yaodong & Lin, Lin & Zeng, Shengchuo & Huang, Jincheng & Roskilly, Anthony P. & He, Yunxin & Huang, Xiaodong & Li, Shanping, 2008. "Application of the Miller cycle to reduce NOx emissions from petrol engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(6), pages 463-474, June.
    8. Cabrera-Jiménez, Richard & Mateo-Sanz, Josep M. & Gavaldà, Jordi & Jiménez, Laureano & Pozo, Carlos, 2022. "Comparing biofuels through the lens of sustainability: A data envelopment analysis approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    9. Canakci, Mustafa & Ozsezen, Ahmet Necati & Alptekin, Ertan & Eyidogan, Muharrem, 2013. "Impact of alcohol–gasoline fuel blends on the exhaust emission of an SI engine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 111-117.
    10. Ali Alahmer & Hussein Alahmer & Ahmed Handam & Hegazy Rezk, 2022. "Environmental Assessment of a Diesel Engine Fueled with Various Biodiesel Blends: Polynomial Regression and Grey Wolf Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-32, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bergthorson, Jeffrey M. & Thomson, Murray J., 2015. "A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1393-1417.
    2. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat & Tatari, Omer, 2015. "Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 36-49.
    3. Dhamodaran, Gopinath & Esakkimuthu, Ganapathy Sundaram & Pochareddy, Yashwanth Kutti & Sivasubramanian, Harish, 2017. "Investigation of n-butanol as fuel in a four-cylinder MPFI SI engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 726-735.
    4. Cotterman, Turner & Fuchs, Erica R.H. & Whitefoot, Kate S. & Combemale, Christophe, 2024. "The transition to electrified vehicles: Evaluating the labor demand of manufacturing conventional versus battery electric vehicle powertrains," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Nuthan Prasad, B.S. & Pandey, Jayashish Kumar & Kumar, G.N., 2020. "Impact of changing compression ratio on engine characteristics of an SI engine fueled with equi-volume blend of methanol and gasoline," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Najmul Hoque & Wahidul Biswas & Ilyas Mazhar & Ian Howard, 2020. "Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Alternative Energy Sources for the Western Australian Transport Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-33, July.
    7. T.E.T Dantas & S.R Soares, 2022. "Systematic literature review on the application of life cycle sustainability assessment in the energy sector," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1583-1615, February.
    8. Yusri, I.M. & Mamat, R. & Najafi, G. & Razman, A. & Awad, Omar I. & Azmi, W.H. & Ishak, W.F.W. & Shaiful, A.I.M., 2017. "Alcohol based automotive fuels from first four alcohol family in compression and spark ignition engine: A review on engine performance and exhaust emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 169-181.
    9. Martin Kügemann & Heracles Polatidis, 2019. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Road Transportation Fuels and Vehicles: A Systematic Review and Classification of the Literature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Zhen, Xudong & Wang, Yang, 2015. "An overview of methanol as an internal combustion engine fuel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 477-493.
    11. Awad, Omar I. & Mamat, R. & Ali, Obed M. & Sidik, N.A.C. & Yusaf, T. & Kadirgama, K. & Kettner, Maurice, 2018. "Alcohol and ether as alternative fuels in spark ignition engine: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2586-2605.
    12. Anne Magdalene Syré & Florian Heining & Dietmar Göhlich, 2020. "Method for a Multi-Vehicle, Simulation-Based Life Cycle Assessment and Application to Berlin’s Motorized Individual Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Nelson, Ewan & Warren, Peter, 2020. "UK transport decoupling: On track for clean growth in transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-51.
    14. Kucukvar, Murat & Haider, Muhammad Ali & Onat, Nuri Cihat, 2017. "Exploring the material footprints of national electricity production scenarios until 2050: The case for Turkey and UK," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 251-263.
    15. Ghotge, Rishabh & van Wijk, Ad & Lukszo, Zofia, 2021. "Off-grid solar charging of electric vehicles at long-term parking locations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Ashraf K. Abdelaal & Elshahat F. Mohamed & Attia A. El-Fergany, 2022. "Optimal Scheduling of Hybrid Sustainable Energy Microgrid: A Case Study for a Resort in Sokhna, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, October.
    17. Marit Mohr & Jens F. Peters & Manuel Baumann & Marcel Weil, 2020. "Toward a cell‐chemistry specific life cycle assessment of lithium‐ion battery recycling processes," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1310-1322, December.
    18. Christian Wankmüller & Maximilian Kunovjanek & Robert Gennaro Sposato & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Renzi, Massimiliano & Bietresato, Marco & Mazzetto, Fabrizio, 2016. "An experimental evaluation of the performance of a SI internal combustion engine for agricultural purposes fuelled with different bioethanol blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1069-1080.
    20. Shi, Xiao & Pan, Jian & Wang, Hewu & Cai, Hua, 2019. "Battery electric vehicles: What is the minimum range required?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 352-358.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03752-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.