IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v23y2021i4d10.1007_s10668-020-00876-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engineering aspect of sustainability assessment for geotechnical projects

Author

Listed:
  • Faisal Raza

    (National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST))

  • Badee Alshameri

    (National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST))

  • S. Muhammad Jamil

    (National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST))

Abstract

Sustainability is the ability of the system to retain and survive its functionality with time. A system is sustainable as long as the capacity (supply) is greater than the load (demand). Along the timeline of the project, the options to ensure sustainability minimize inferring better planning considerations at early stages. Geotechnical engineering, being the opening phase of any construction project, can contribute most to attain sustainability goals for all aspects, i.e. engineering, environmental, economic, and equity (4Es). Through a survey and available literature, it has been concluded that geotechnical engineering lacks a dedicated sustainability assessment tool/technique. Different assessment techniques/tools and technical aspects of geotechnics were studied to develop Geo-SAT (Geotechnical Sustainability Assessment Tool). Geo-SAT is developed to ensure the lack of research encompassing global sustainability goals. Based on quantifiable indicators assessed by a third party on a scale of 1 (detrimental) to 5 (significantly improved) measuring the impact on sustainability for each decision made, a total of 171 indicators were developed (all generic in nature) with the flexibility of addition, exclusion, and/or modification as per project’s nature. The engineering aspect is developed using 92 indicators, 27 retained and 8 modified from Environmental Geotechnics Indicators (EGIs), and 57 new. The different fields targeted are dams, foundations, landslides, contaminated site remediation, soil and erosion control, offshore construction, and transportation.

Suggested Citation

  • Faisal Raza & Badee Alshameri & S. Muhammad Jamil, 2021. "Engineering aspect of sustainability assessment for geotechnical projects," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6359-6394, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-020-00876-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00876-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-020-00876-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-020-00876-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Bernardi & Salvatore Carlucci & Cristina Cornaro & Rolf André Bohne, 2017. "An Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-27, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jolanta Harasymiuk & Elżbieta Szafranko, 2022. "Method of Construction Projects’ Classification for Habitat Assessment in Poland and the Problem of Choosing Materials Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Kainat Batool & Badee Alshameri & Faisal Raza & Abbas Haider & Majid Ali, 2024. "Normalization of geotechnical sustainability assessment tool (Geo-SAT) using multiple criteria decision analysis for dams," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19871-19905, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jubril Olakitan Atanda & Ayşe Öztürk, 2020. "Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 61-87, January.
    2. Tatiana Santos Saraiva & Manuela Almeida & Luís Bragança & Maria Teresa Barbosa, 2019. "Verification of the Adequacy of the Portuguese Sustainability Assessment Tool of High School Buildings, SAHSB PT , to the Francisco de Holanda High School, Guimarães," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Çağla Beyaz & Çilen Erçin, 2023. "Evaluation of Modern Architecture Criteria in the Context of Sustainability and Architectural Approach; Modern Period in North Nicosia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-48, June.
    4. Bruno Menezes Galindro & Sebastian Welling & Niki Bey & Stig Irving Olsen & Sebastião Roberto Soares & Sven‐Olof Ryding, 2020. "Making use of life cycle assessment and environmental product declarations: A survey with practitioners," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 965-975, October.
    5. Aidana Tleuken & Galym Tokazhanov & Mert Guney & Ali Turkyilmaz & Ferhat Karaca, 2021. "Readiness Assessment of Green Building Certification Systems for Residential Buildings during Pandemics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    6. Katherine Madson & Bryan Franz & Robert Leicht & Jonathan Nelson, 2022. "Evaluating the Sustainability of New Construction Projects over Time by Examining the Evolution of the LEED Rating System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Wei Wang, 2021. "The concept of sustainable construction project management in international practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16358-16380, November.
    8. Borja Izaola & Ortzi Akizu-Gardoki & Xabat Oregi, 2022. "Life Cycle Analysis Challenges through Building Rating Schemes within the European Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Svetlana Pushkar, 2018. "The Effect of Regional Priority Points on the Performance of LEED 2009 Certified Buildings in Turkey, Spain, and Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Elnaz Farjami & Özlem Olgaç Türker, 2021. "The Extraction of Prerequisite Criteria for Environmentally Certified Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Simona Calvagna & Antonio Gagliano & Sebastiano Greco & Gianluca Rodonò & Vincenzo Sapienza, 2020. "Innovative Multidisciplinary Methodology for the Analysis of Traditional Marginal Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-31, February.
    12. Stefano Cascone, 2023. "Digital Technologies and Sustainability Assessment: A Critical Review on the Integration Methods between BIM and LEED," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Claudio Del Pero & Oscar Eugenio Bellini & Maricla Martire & Davide di Summa, 2021. "Sustainable Solutions for Mass-Housing Design in Africa: Energy and Cost Assessment for the Somali Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Guangdong Wu & Guofeng Qiang & Jian Zuo & Xianbo Zhao & Ruidong Chang, 2018. "What are the Key Indicators of Mega Sustainable Construction Projects? —A Stakeholder-Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Jinliu Chen & Haoqi Wang & Zhuo Yang & Pengcheng Li & Geng Ma & Xiaoxin Zhao, 2023. "Comparative Spatial Vitality Evaluation of Traditional Settlements Based on SUF: Taking Anren Ancient Town’s Urban Design as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Nataša Šuman & Mojca Marinič & Milan Kuhta, 2020. "A Methodological Framework for Sustainable Office Building Renovation Using Green Building Rating Systems and Cost-Benefit Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    17. Nina Lazar & K. Chithra, 2021. "Comprehensive bibliometric mapping of publication trends in the development of Building Sustainability Assessment Systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4899-4923, April.
    18. Tajda Potrč Obrecht & Roman Kunič & Sabina Jordan & Mateja Dovjak, 2019. "Comparison of Health and Well-Being Aspects in Building Certification Schemes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Lavinia Chiara Tagliabue & Fulvio Re Cecconi & Sebastiano Maltese & Stefano Rinaldi & Angelo Luigi Camillo Ciribini & Alessandra Flammini, 2021. "Leveraging Digital Twin for Sustainability Assessment of an Educational Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Antonio Sánchez Cordero & Sergio Gómez Melgar & José Manuel Andújar Márquez, 2019. "Green Building Rating Systems and the New Framework Level(s): A Critical Review of Sustainability Certification within Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-020-00876-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.