IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2178-d154467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from Dispersion and Cementitious Waterproofing Products

Author

Listed:
  • Mateusz Kozicki

    (Department of Thermal Physics, Acoustic and Environment, Building Research Institute, 00-611 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Michał Piasecki

    (Department of Thermal Physics, Acoustic and Environment, Building Research Institute, 00-611 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Anna Goljan

    (Department of Thermal Physics, Acoustic and Environment, Building Research Institute, 00-611 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Halina Deptuła

    (Department of Thermal Physics, Acoustic and Environment, Building Research Institute, 00-611 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Adam Niesłochowski

    (Department of Thermal Physics, Acoustic and Environment, Building Research Institute, 00-611 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Many different methods and indicators are commonly used for the assessment of indoor air quality (IAQ). One of them is pollution source control; among the sources, building materials are of special concern. This study presents a source characterization of waterproofing products used mainly in non-industrial buildings. The authors have attempted to fill some research gaps by determining emission factors for waterproofing materials. The work contains a summary of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from dispersion and cementitious liquid-applied water-impermeable products. VOC emissions were determined in a 100-L stainless steel ventilated emission test chamber. Air samples were collected by an active method on Tenax TA ® , while VOCs were analyzed using a TD-GC/MS method. Identified VOCs were also expressed as the total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) and converted into area-specific emission rates q A . The results for different groups of identified compounds (alcohols, benzene derivatives, aldehydes, ketones, ethers and esters) were compared. It was found that VOC emissions clearly decreased with time during each experiment, which lasted 28 days. It is further noted that different types of products were characterized by the emission of specific groups of compounds that were not emitted by other types of products. An essential factor in the elimination and minimization of the occurrence of sources of indoor air pollution is the appropriate selection of finishing materials, which should be characterized by as low as possible emission of VOCs. The results presented in this work can lead to practical applications in the selection of low-emission products for certified green buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateusz Kozicki & Michał Piasecki & Anna Goljan & Halina Deptuła & Adam Niesłochowski, 2018. "Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from Dispersion and Cementitious Waterproofing Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2178-:d:154467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiyoung Park & Jungwon Yoon & Kwang-Hyun Kim, 2017. "Critical Review of the Material Criteria of Building Sustainability Assessment Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Elena Bernardi & Salvatore Carlucci & Cristina Cornaro & Rolf André Bohne, 2017. "An Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-27, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mateusz Kozicki & Anna Wiejak & Michał Piasecki & Alicja Abram, 2019. "Identification of MVOCs Produced by Coniophora puteana and Poria placenta Growing on WPC Boards by Using Subtraction Mass Spectra," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Jolanda Palmisani & Alessia Di Gilio & Ezia Cisternino & Maria Tutino & Gianluigi de Gennaro, 2020. "Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from a Personal Care Polymer-Based Item: Simulation of the Inhalation Exposure Scenario Indoors under Actual Conditions of Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Yao-Tang Hsu & Wen-Hsin Wang & Wei-Hsi Hung, 2020. "Evaluating the Properties of a Coating Material with Polycaprolactone-Degradable Fluorinated Silicon-Containing Waterborne Polyurethane," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Michał Piasecki & Mateusz Kozicki & Szymon Firląg & Anna Goljan & Krystyna Kostyrko, 2018. "The Approach of Including TVOCs Concentration in the Indoor Environmental Quality Model (IEQ)—Case Studies of BREEAM Certified Office Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Rafael Piñeiro & Eva Jimenez-Relinque & Roman Nevshupa & Marta Castellote, 2021. "Primary and Secondary Emissions of VOCs and PAHs in Indoor Air from a Waterproof Coal-Tar Membrane: Diagnosis and Remediation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jonas Šaparauskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2018. "Sustainability in Construction Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-7, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Barreca & Giuseppe Davide Cardinali, 2019. "ITACAFood: A Model to Certificate the Sustainability of Food Processing Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Nataša Šuman & Mojca Marinič & Milan Kuhta, 2020. "A Methodological Framework for Sustainable Office Building Renovation Using Green Building Rating Systems and Cost-Benefit Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Nina Lazar & K. Chithra, 2021. "Comprehensive bibliometric mapping of publication trends in the development of Building Sustainability Assessment Systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4899-4923, April.
    4. Antonio Sánchez Cordero & Sergio Gómez Melgar & José Manuel Andújar Márquez, 2019. "Green Building Rating Systems and the New Framework Level(s): A Critical Review of Sustainability Certification within Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Lihua Liang & Baohua Wen & Feng Xu & Jianwei Yan & Xiangqi Yan & S. Ramesh, 2021. "Linking the Development of Building Sustainability Assessment Tools with the Concept Evolution of Sustainable Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Héctor Saldaña-Márquez & Diana C. Gámez-García & José M. Gómez-Soberón & Susana P. Arredondo-Rea & Ramón Corral-Higuera & María C. Gómez-Soberón, 2019. "Housing Indicators for Sustainable Cities in Middle-Income Countries through the Residential Urban Environment Recognized Using Single-Family Housing Rating Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Oriol Pons-Valladares & Jelena Nikolic, 2020. "Sustainable Design, Construction, Refurbishment and Restoration of Architecture: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Jubril Olakitan Atanda & Ayşe Öztürk, 2020. "Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 61-87, January.
    9. Çağla Beyaz & Çilen Erçin, 2023. "Evaluation of Modern Architecture Criteria in the Context of Sustainability and Architectural Approach; Modern Period in North Nicosia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-48, June.
    10. Bruno Menezes Galindro & Sebastian Welling & Niki Bey & Stig Irving Olsen & Sebastião Roberto Soares & Sven‐Olof Ryding, 2020. "Making use of life cycle assessment and environmental product declarations: A survey with practitioners," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 965-975, October.
    11. Aidana Tleuken & Galym Tokazhanov & Mert Guney & Ali Turkyilmaz & Ferhat Karaca, 2021. "Readiness Assessment of Green Building Certification Systems for Residential Buildings during Pandemics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    12. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Siu-Kit Lau, 2020. "A Framework for Early Stages of Socially Sustainable Renovation of Multifamily Buildings with Occupants’ Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Guangdong Wu & Guofeng Qiang & Jian Zuo & Xianbo Zhao & Ruidong Chang, 2018. "What are the Key Indicators of Mega Sustainable Construction Projects? —A Stakeholder-Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Lavinia Chiara Tagliabue & Fulvio Re Cecconi & Sebastiano Maltese & Stefano Rinaldi & Angelo Luigi Camillo Ciribini & Alessandra Flammini, 2021. "Leveraging Digital Twin for Sustainability Assessment of an Educational Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Chen-Yi Sun & Yin-Guang Chen & Rong-Jing Wang & Shih-Chi Lo & Jyh-Tyng Yau & Ya-Wen Wu, 2019. "Construction Cost of Green Building Certified Residence: A Case Study in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-10, April.
    16. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Sustainability of Wood-Based Constructions’ Use from the Perspective of Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Anh-Duc Pham & Quang Trung Nguyen & Duc Long Luong & Quynh Chau Truong, 2020. "The Development of a Decision Support Model for Eco-Friendly Material Selection in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Faisal Raza & Badee Alshameri & S. Muhammad Jamil, 2021. "Engineering aspect of sustainability assessment for geotechnical projects," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6359-6394, April.
    19. Gulzhanat Akhanova & Abid Nadeem & Jong R. Kim & Salman Azhar, 2019. "A Framework of Building Sustainability Assessment System for the Commercial Buildings in Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Shirley Kempeneer & Michaël Peeters & Tine Compernolle, 2021. "Bringing the User Back in the Building: An Analysis of ESG in Real Estate and a Behavioral Framework to Guide Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2178-:d:154467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.