IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v24y2020i5p965-975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making use of life cycle assessment and environmental product declarations: A survey with practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Menezes Galindro
  • Sebastian Welling
  • Niki Bey
  • Stig Irving Olsen
  • Sebastião Roberto Soares
  • Sven‐Olof Ryding

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) represent important sources of information in applications such as ecodesign and process optimization. However, their use in comparisons and communication is still limited. Therefore, this article aims to understand the use of LCA‐ and EPD‐information from the perspective of the practitioners, that is, professionals with experience in dealing with this type of information. A survey was built consisting of two questionnaires and two webinars, with questions related to core themes: frequency and purpose of use, comparability, and advantages and disadvantages for practical use and reliability of different presentation formats. Also, two suggested benchmarking frameworks were presented and discussed, later being commented upon and evaluated. Out of the 55 respondents, 76% stated that they use both LCA‐ and EPD‐information, primarily to fulfill requirements from customers, in environmental management systems and for marketing purposes. It was also stated that they use LCA (73%)‐ and EPD (56%)‐information to make comparisons but presented different responses and there were no established patterns as to the procedures. Methodological limitations and the need for harmonization of Product Category Rules (PCRs) were mentioned as limiting factors for comparisons between studies. Regarding the benchmarking frameworks, both were indicated to be potentially applicable in communication with consumers and between companies. It is concluded that LCA‐ and EPD‐information is used by the practitioners in different applications and that there may be a need to increase standardization efforts of benchmarking procedures in order to improve communication with nonspecialist audiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Menezes Galindro & Sebastian Welling & Niki Bey & Stig Irving Olsen & Sebastião Roberto Soares & Sven‐Olof Ryding, 2020. "Making use of life cycle assessment and environmental product declarations: A survey with practitioners," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 965-975, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:24:y:2020:i:5:p:965-975
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Bernardi & Salvatore Carlucci & Cristina Cornaro & Rolf André Bohne, 2017. "An Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-27, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edyta Baran & Sebastian Czernik & Mariusz Hynowski & Bartosz Michałowski & Michał Piasecki & Justyna Tomaszewska & Jacek Michalak, 2021. "Quantifying Environmental Burdens of Plasters Based on Natural vs. Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Gypsum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Jacek Michalak & Bartosz Michałowski, 2022. "Understanding Sustainability of Construction Products: Answers from Investors, Contractors, and Sellers of Building Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Jacek Michalak & Bartosz Michałowski, 2021. "Understanding of Construction Product Assessment Issues and Sustainability among Investors, Architects, Contractors, and Sellers of Construction Products in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Alessandra Bonoli & Sara Zanni & Francisco Serrano-Bernardo, 2021. "Sustainability in Building and Construction within the Framework of Circular Cities and European New Green Deal. The Contribution of Concrete Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Jacek Michalak, 2021. "External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems (ETICS) from Industry and Academia Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Viktoria Mannheim & Weronika Kruszelnicka, 2022. "Energy-Model and Life Cycle-Model for Grinding Processes of Limestone Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Sebastian Czernik & Marta Marcinek & Bartosz Michałowski & Michał Piasecki & Justyna Tomaszewska & Jacek Michalak, 2020. "Environmental Footprint of Cementitious Adhesives—Components of ETICS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jubril Olakitan Atanda & Ayşe Öztürk, 2020. "Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 61-87, January.
    2. Çağla Beyaz & Çilen Erçin, 2023. "Evaluation of Modern Architecture Criteria in the Context of Sustainability and Architectural Approach; Modern Period in North Nicosia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-48, June.
    3. Aidana Tleuken & Galym Tokazhanov & Mert Guney & Ali Turkyilmaz & Ferhat Karaca, 2021. "Readiness Assessment of Green Building Certification Systems for Residential Buildings during Pandemics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    4. Guangdong Wu & Guofeng Qiang & Jian Zuo & Xianbo Zhao & Ruidong Chang, 2018. "What are the Key Indicators of Mega Sustainable Construction Projects? —A Stakeholder-Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Lavinia Chiara Tagliabue & Fulvio Re Cecconi & Sebastiano Maltese & Stefano Rinaldi & Angelo Luigi Camillo Ciribini & Alessandra Flammini, 2021. "Leveraging Digital Twin for Sustainability Assessment of an Educational Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Sustainability of Wood-Based Constructions’ Use from the Perspective of Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Faisal Raza & Badee Alshameri & S. Muhammad Jamil, 2021. "Engineering aspect of sustainability assessment for geotechnical projects," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6359-6394, April.
    8. Gulzhanat Akhanova & Abid Nadeem & Jong R. Kim & Salman Azhar, 2019. "A Framework of Building Sustainability Assessment System for the Commercial Buildings in Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Francesco Barreca & Giuseppe Davide Cardinali, 2019. "ITACAFood: A Model to Certificate the Sustainability of Food Processing Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Mateusz Kozicki & Michał Piasecki & Anna Goljan & Halina Deptuła & Adam Niesłochowski, 2018. "Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from Dispersion and Cementitious Waterproofing Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Shirley Kempeneer & Michaël Peeters & Tine Compernolle, 2021. "Bringing the User Back in the Building: An Analysis of ESG in Real Estate and a Behavioral Framework to Guide Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
    12. Ana Ferreira & Manuel Pinheiro & Jorge de Brito & Ricardo Mateus, 2022. "Assessing the Sustainability of Retail Buildings: The Portuguese Method LiderA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Tatiana Santos Saraiva & Manuela Almeida & Luís Bragança & Maria Teresa Barbosa, 2019. "Verification of the Adequacy of the Portuguese Sustainability Assessment Tool of High School Buildings, SAHSB PT , to the Francisco de Holanda High School, Guimarães," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Katherine Madson & Bryan Franz & Robert Leicht & Jonathan Nelson, 2022. "Evaluating the Sustainability of New Construction Projects over Time by Examining the Evolution of the LEED Rating System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Wei Wang, 2021. "The concept of sustainable construction project management in international practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16358-16380, November.
    16. Borja Izaola & Ortzi Akizu-Gardoki & Xabat Oregi, 2022. "Life Cycle Analysis Challenges through Building Rating Schemes within the European Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Svetlana Pushkar, 2018. "The Effect of Regional Priority Points on the Performance of LEED 2009 Certified Buildings in Turkey, Spain, and Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Elnaz Farjami & Özlem Olgaç Türker, 2021. "The Extraction of Prerequisite Criteria for Environmentally Certified Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    19. Simona Calvagna & Antonio Gagliano & Sebastiano Greco & Gianluca Rodonò & Vincenzo Sapienza, 2020. "Innovative Multidisciplinary Methodology for the Analysis of Traditional Marginal Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-31, February.
    20. Stefano Cascone, 2023. "Digital Technologies and Sustainability Assessment: A Critical Review on the Integration Methods between BIM and LEED," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:24:y:2020:i:5:p:965-975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.