IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4277-d786754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method of Construction Projects’ Classification for Habitat Assessment in Poland and the Problem of Choosing Materials Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Jolanta Harasymiuk

    (Institute of Geodesy and Civil Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Geoengineering, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Elżbieta Szafranko

    (Institute of Geodesy and Civil Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Geoengineering, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

The planning stage plays a key role in the success of each construction project. It also pertains to projects implementedin the Natura 2000 areas that cover ca. 18% of the total land area in the EU. Permission for the realization of such a project is issued after an analysis of its environmental impact on the Natura 2000 area. An important part of the analysis undertaken as part of a habitat assessment should be the evaluation of proposed material solutions. The research has revealed that habitat assessments in Poland do not fulfill this postulation. The decision-making process is based on the legal qualification criteria, and the fundamental importance in it has a precautionary principle. Practical realization of this principle demonstrates, however, shortcomings in its methodology. The article presents the results of two research stages. In the first stage, the documentation of 292 construction projects was examined in order to prepare the principal components of a checklist. They are correlated to the legal qualification criteria. However, they are more precise and systematic. In the second stage of the research, a survey of 47 experts was performed, and the result of the research is an innovative module of the checklist for qualification of construction projects to the habitat assessment, including questions on materials solutions. The research has proved that introduction of this proposal to the checklist may improve the quality of habitat assessments, increase their trustworthiness and ensure full exploitation of the possibilities which are given by the use of uniform research methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Jolanta Harasymiuk & Elżbieta Szafranko, 2022. "Method of Construction Projects’ Classification for Habitat Assessment in Poland and the Problem of Choosing Materials Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4277-:d:786754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Núria Boix Rodríguez & Giovanni Formentini & Claudio Favi & Marco Marconi, 2021. "Engineering Design Process of Face Masks Based on Circularity and Life Cycle Assessment in the Constraint of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Sikorska-Wolak, Izabella & Zawadka, Jan & Krzyżanowska, Krystyna, 2020. "The Investment Attractiveness Of Regions As One Of Entrepreneurship Development Factors," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 13(2), June.
    3. Faisal Raza & Badee Alshameri & S. Muhammad Jamil, 2021. "Engineering aspect of sustainability assessment for geotechnical projects," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6359-6394, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kainat Batool & Badee Alshameri & Faisal Raza & Abbas Haider & Majid Ali, 2024. "Normalization of geotechnical sustainability assessment tool (Geo-SAT) using multiple criteria decision analysis for dams," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19871-19905, August.
    2. Marcell Mariano Corrêa Maceno & Samuel João & Danielle Raphaela Voltolini & Izabel Cristina Zattar, 2023. "Life cycle assessment and circularity evaluation of the non-medical masks in the Covid-19 pandemic: a Brazilian case," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8055-8082, August.
    3. Honglei Lu & Chunxiao Zhu & Xin Cao & Yen Hsu, 2022. "The Sustainability Evaluation of Masks Based on the Integrated Rank Sum Ratio and Entropy Weight Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Kozera, Agnieszka & Satoła, Łukasz & Standar, Aldona & Dworakowska-Raj, Małgorzata, 2022. "Regional diversity of low-carbon investment support from EU funds in the 2014–2020 financial perspective based on the example of Polish municipalities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Tao, Yanqiu & You, Fengqi, 2021. "Can decontamination and reuse of N95 respirators during COVID-19 pandemic provide energy, environmental, and economic benefits?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4277-:d:786754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.