IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v71y2018i2d10.1007_s10589-018-0020-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A progressive barrier derivative-free trust-region algorithm for constrained optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Audet

    (École Polytechnique de Montréal)

  • Andrew R. Conn

    (IBM T J Watson Research Center)

  • Sébastien Le Digabel

    (École Polytechnique de Montréal)

  • Mathilde Peyrega

    (École Polytechnique de Montréal)

Abstract

We study derivative-free constrained optimization problems and propose a trust-region method that builds linear or quadratic models around the best feasible and around the best infeasible solutions found so far. These models are optimized within a trust region, and the progressive barrier methodology handles the constraints by progressively pushing the infeasible solutions toward the feasible domain. Computational experiments on 40 smooth constrained problems indicate that the proposed method is competitive with COBYLA, and experiments on two nonsmooth multidisciplinary optimization problems from mechanical engineering show that it can be competitive with the NOMAD software.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Audet & Andrew R. Conn & Sébastien Le Digabel & Mathilde Peyrega, 2018. "A progressive barrier derivative-free trust-region algorithm for constrained optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 307-329, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:71:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10589-018-0020-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-018-0020-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-018-0020-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-018-0020-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Gould & Dominique Orban & Philippe Toint, 2015. "CUTEst: a Constrained and Unconstrained Testing Environment with safe threads for mathematical optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 545-557, April.
    2. E. Gumma & M. Hashim & M. Ali, 2014. "A derivative-free algorithm for linearly constrained optimization problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 599-621, April.
    3. Ph. Sampaio & Ph. Toint, 2015. "A derivative-free trust-funnel method for equality-constrained nonlinear optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 25-49, May.
    4. Charles Audet & J. Dennis & Sébastien Digabel, 2010. "Globalization strategies for Mesh Adaptive Direct Search," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 193-215, June.
    5. Charles Audet & Sébastien Le Digabel & Mathilde Peyrega, 2015. "Linear equalities in blackbox optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pooriya Beyhaghi & Ryan Alimo & Thomas Bewley, 2020. "A derivative-free optimization algorithm for the efficient minimization of functions obtained via statistical averaging," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 1-31, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Gratton & C. W. Royer & L. N. Vicente & Z. Zhang, 2019. "Direct search based on probabilistic feasible descent for bound and linearly constrained problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 525-559, April.
    2. Ubaldo M. García Palomares, 2023. "Convergence of derivative-free nonmonotone Direct Search Methods for unconstrained and box-constrained mixed-integer optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 821-856, July.
    3. David J. Eckman & Shane G. Henderson & Sara Shashaani, 2023. "Diagnostic Tools for Evaluating and Comparing Simulation-Optimization Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 350-367, March.
    4. Brian Irwin & Eldad Haber, 2023. "Secant penalized BFGS: a noise robust quasi-Newton method via penalizing the secant condition," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 651-702, April.
    5. Matteo Lapucci & Alessio Sortino, 2024. "On the Convergence of Inexact Alternate Minimization in Problems with $$\ell _0$$ ℓ 0 Penalties," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-11, June.
    6. S. Gratton & Ph. L. Toint, 2020. "A note on solving nonlinear optimization problems in variable precision," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 917-933, July.
    7. Tommaso Giovannelli & Giampaolo Liuzzi & Stefano Lucidi & Francesco Rinaldi, 2022. "Derivative-free methods for mixed-integer nonsmooth constrained optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 293-327, June.
    8. Yutao Zheng & Bing Zheng, 2017. "Two New Dai–Liao-Type Conjugate Gradient Methods for Unconstrained Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 502-509, November.
    9. Giovanni Fasano & Massimo Roma, 2016. "A novel class of approximate inverse preconditioners for large positive definite linear systems in optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 399-429, November.
    10. Yonggang Pei & Shaofang Song & Detong Zhu, 2023. "A sequential adaptive regularisation using cubics algorithm for solving nonlinear equality constrained optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 1005-1033, April.
    11. J. Martínez & F. Sobral, 2013. "Constrained derivative-free optimization on thin domains," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1217-1232, July.
    12. Jiyuan Zhang & Bin Zhang & Shiqian Xu & Qihong Feng & Xianmin Zhang & Derek Elsworth, 2021. "Interpretation of Gas/Water Relative Permeability of Coal Using the Hybrid Bayesian-Assisted History Matching: New Insights," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Mehiddin Al-Baali & Andrea Caliciotti & Giovanni Fasano & Massimo Roma, 2017. "Exploiting damped techniques for nonlinear conjugate gradient methods," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 86(3), pages 501-522, December.
    14. M. Ahmadvand & M. Esmaeilbeigi & A. Kamandi & F. M. Yaghoobi, 2019. "A novel hybrid trust region algorithm based on nonmonotone and LOOCV techniques," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 499-524, March.
    15. Nicolas Boutet & Rob Haelterman & Joris Degroote, 2021. "Secant Update generalized version of PSB: a new approach," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 953-982, April.
    16. E. G. Birgin & J. L. Gardenghi & J. M. Martínez & S. A. Santos, 2021. "On the solution of linearly constrained optimization problems by means of barrier algorithms," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 417-441, July.
    17. Andrea Cristofari & Gianni Di Pillo & Giampaolo Liuzzi & Stefano Lucidi, 2022. "An Augmented Lagrangian Method Exploiting an Active-Set Strategy and Second-Order Information," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 300-323, June.
    18. Moody Chu & Matthew Lin & Liqi Wang, 2014. "A study of singular spectrum analysis with global optimization techniques," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 551-574, November.
    19. Nicholas I. M. Gould & Daniel P. Robinson, 2017. "A dual gradient-projection method for large-scale strictly convex quadratic problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 1-38, May.
    20. Charles Audet & Kwassi Joseph Dzahini & Michael Kokkolaras & Sébastien Le Digabel, 2021. "Stochastic mesh adaptive direct search for blackbox optimization using probabilistic estimates," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 1-34, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:71:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10589-018-0020-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.