IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comgts/v14y2017i3d10.1007_s10287-017-0279-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality evaluation of scenario-tree generation methods for solving stochastic programming problems

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Keutchayan

    (École Polytechnique de Montréal
    Logistics and Transportation (CIRRELT))

  • Michel Gendreau

    (École Polytechnique de Montréal
    Logistics and Transportation (CIRRELT))

  • Antoine Saucier

    (École Polytechnique de Montréal)

Abstract

This paper addresses the generation of scenario trees to solve stochastic programming problems that have a large number of possible values for the random parameters (possibly infinitely many). For the sake of the computational efficiency, the scenario trees must include only a finite (rather small) number of scenarios, therefore, they provide decisions only for some values of the random parameters. To overcome the resulting loss of information, we propose to introduce an extension procedure. It is a systematic approach to interpolate and extrapolate the scenario-tree decisions to obtain a decision policy that can be implemented for any value of the random parameters at little computational cost. To assess the quality of the scenario-tree generation method and the extension procedure (STGM-EP), we introduce three generic quality parameters that focus on the quality of the decisions. We use these quality parameters to develop a framework that will help the decision-maker to select the most suitable STGM-EP for a given stochastic programming problem. We perform numerical experiments on two case studies. The quality parameters are used to compare three scenario-tree generation methods and three extension procedures (hence nine couples STGM-EP). We show that it is possible to single out the best couple in both problems, which provides decisions close to optimality at little computational cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Keutchayan & Michel Gendreau & Antoine Saucier, 2017. "Quality evaluation of scenario-tree generation methods for solving stochastic programming problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 333-365, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:14:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10287-017-0279-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10287-017-0279-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10287-017-0279-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10287-017-0279-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kouwenberg, Roy, 2001. "Scenario generation and stochastic programming models for asset liability management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 279-292, October.
    2. Pierre L'Ecuyer & Christiane Lemieux, 2000. "Variance Reduction via Lattice Rules," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1214-1235, September.
    3. Georg Pflug & Alois Pichler, 2015. "Dynamic generation of scenario trees," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 641-668, December.
    4. Boris Defourny & Damien Ernst & Louis Wehenkel, 2013. "Scenario Trees and Policy Selection for Multistage Stochastic Programming Using Machine Learning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 488-501, August.
    5. Kjetil Høyland & Stein W. Wallace, 2001. "Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 295-307, February.
    6. Michael Chen & Sanjay Mehrotra & Dávid Papp, 2015. "Scenario generation for stochastic optimization problems via the sparse grid method," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 669-692, December.
    7. Teemu Pennanen, 2005. "Epi-Convergent Discretizations of Multistage Stochastic Programs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 245-256, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexia Marchand & Michel Gendreau & Marko Blais & Jonathan Guidi, 2019. "Optimized operating rules for short-term hydropower planning in a stochastic environment," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 501-519, July.
    2. Julien Keutchayan & Janosch Ortmann & Walter Rei, 2023. "Problem-driven scenario clustering in stochastic optimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-33, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boris Defourny & Damien Ernst & Louis Wehenkel, 2013. "Scenario Trees and Policy Selection for Multistage Stochastic Programming Using Machine Learning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 488-501, August.
    2. Julien Keutchayan & Janosch Ortmann & Walter Rei, 2023. "Problem-driven scenario clustering in stochastic optimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-33, December.
    3. Gulpinar, Nalan & Rustem, Berc & Settergren, Reuben, 2004. "Simulation and optimization approaches to scenario tree generation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1291-1315, April.
    4. Wu, Dexiang & Wu, Desheng Dash, 2020. "A decision support approach for two-stage multi-objective index tracking using improved lagrangian decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. D. Kuhn, 2009. "Convergent Bounds for Stochastic Programs with Expected Value Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 597-618, June.
    6. Jacek Gondzio & Roy Kouwenberg, 2001. "High-Performance Computing for Asset-Liability Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 879-891, December.
    7. John M. Mulvey & Koray D. Simsek & Zhuojuan Zhang & Frank J. Fabozzi & William R. Pauling, 2008. "OR PRACTICE---Assisting Defined-Benefit Pension Plans," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1066-1078, October.
    8. Sodhi, ManMohan S. & Tang, Christopher S., 2009. "Modeling supply-chain planning under demand uncertainty using stochastic programming: A survey motivated by asset-liability management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 728-738, October.
    9. Silvia Araújo dos Reis & José Eugenio Leal & Antônio Márcio Tavares Thomé, 2023. "A Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programming Model for Tactical Planning in the Soybean Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-26, August.
    10. Yousra Tourki & Jeffrey Keisler & Igor Linkov, 2013. "Scenario analysis: a review of methods and applications for engineering and environmental systems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 3-20, March.
    11. Agnieszka Konicz & David Pisinger & Alex Weissensteiner, 2015. "Optimal annuity portfolio under inflation risk," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 461-488, July.
    12. Mitra, Sovan & Lim, Sungmook & Karathanasopoulos, Andreas, 2019. "Regression based scenario generation: Applications for performance management," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    13. Tiberius, Victor & Siglow, Caroline & Sendra-García, Javier, 2020. "Scenarios in business and management: The current stock and research opportunities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 235-242.
    14. Caio Mário Mesquita & Cristiano Arbex Valle & Adriano César Machado Pereira, 2024. "Scenario Generation for Financial Data with a Machine Learning Approach Based on Realized Volatility and Copulas," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(5), pages 1879-1919, May.
    15. Geyer, Alois & Hanke, Michael & Weissensteiner, Alex, 2014. "No-arbitrage bounds for financial scenarios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 657-663.
    16. Torres-Rincón, Samuel & Sánchez-Silva, Mauricio & Bastidas-Arteaga, Emilio, 2021. "A multistage stochastic program for the design and management of flexible infrastructure networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    17. Pieter Klaassen, 2002. "Comment on "Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(11), pages 1512-1516, November.
    18. Fan, Wei & Machemehl, Randy, 2004. "A Multi-stage Monte Carlo Sampling Based Stochastic Programming Model for the Dynamic Vehicle Allocation Problem," 45th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Evanston, Illinois, March 21-23, 2004 208244, Transportation Research Forum.
    19. Barro, Diana & Consigli, Giorgio & Varun, Vivek, 2022. "A stochastic programming model for dynamic portfolio management with financial derivatives," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    20. Fleten, Stein-Erik & Hoyland, Kjetil & Wallace, Stein W., 2002. "The performance of stochastic dynamic and fixed mix portfolio models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 37-49, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:14:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10287-017-0279-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.