IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v137y2016i3d10.1007_s10584-016-1686-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigation of enteric methane emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Dario Caro

    (Aarhus University
    University of California)

  • Ermias Kebreab

    (University of California)

  • Frank M. Mitloehner

    (University of California)

Abstract

Enteric methane (CH4) generated in the gastrointestinal tract of ruminant represents the source of the greatest direct greenhouse gas (GHG) released from the livestock sector. We evaluated the global potential reduction of enteric CH4 emissions released from dairy cattle through amendment of their traditional diets in 183 countries aggregated to 11 regions. Amending dairy cattle diets involves increasing the concentration of lipid (up to 6 %) and decreasing the concentration of fiber, without affecting the total gross energy intake (GEI). Enteric CH4 emissions were calculated by using a mathematical model developed to include dietary intervention. In 2012, we found a global potential reduction of 15.7 % of enteric CH4 emissions from dairy cattle. The highest potential reduction per unit of milk produced occurs in Africa followed by South America and Asia (55, 46 and 34 %, respectively). The amended diets proposed here, mostly affect the regions in which demand for animal source protein will be greatest in the future. Because lipid supplementation may result in an indirect effect on CH4 and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from manure management, they were also estimated. Methane emissions from manure management would decrease by 13 %, while N2O emissions would increase by 21 % due to diet amendment. On balance, the total potential reduction of GHG emissions through diet amendment was 104 MtCO2eq annually. Moreover, amending diets would increase global milk production by 13 %. This study evaluated a global potential reduction of GHG emissions directly released from dairy cattle, however, future advancements dealing with the analysis of the upstream emissions associated to these diet changes are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dario Caro & Ermias Kebreab & Frank M. Mitloehner, 2016. "Mitigation of enteric methane emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 467-480, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:137:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-016-1686-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-016-1686-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-016-1686-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-016-1686-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerosa, Stefano & Skoet, Jakob, 2012. "Milk availability: trends in production and demand and medium-term outlook," ESA Working Papers 289000, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan Frank & Robert Beach & Petr Havlík & Hugo Valin & Mario Herrero & Aline Mosnier & Tomoko Hasegawa & Jared Creason & Shaun Ragnauth & Michael Obersteiner, 2018. "Structural change as a key component for agricultural non-CO2 mitigation efforts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Adriana Rivera-Huerta & María Salud Rubio Lozano & Juan C. Ku-Vera & Leonor Patricia Güereca, 2022. "Emission factors from enteric fermentation of different categories of cattle in the Mexican tropics: a comparison between 2006 and 2019 IPCC," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juliana Silveira dos Santos & Fausto Miziara & Hayla da Silva Fernandes & Renato Cezar Miranda & Rosane Garcia Collevatti, 2021. "Technification in Dairy Farms May Reconcile Habitat Conservation in a Brazilian Savanna Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Carlo Azzarri & Alberto Zezza & Beliyou Haile & Elizabeth Cross, 2015. "Does Livestock Ownership Affect Animal Source Foods Consumption and Child Nutritional Status? Evidence from Rural Uganda," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(8), pages 1034-1059, August.
    3. D'Haene, E. & Desiere, S. & D'Haese, M. & Verbeke, W. & Schoors, K., 2018. "Religion, food choices, and demand seasonality: Evidence from the Ethiopian milk market," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276029, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Tawedzegwa Musitini & Abbysinia Mushunje & Joseph Muroiwa, 2019. "Feeding Management and Extent of Commercialisation among the Smallholder Dairy Farmers in Zimbabwe," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(4), pages 32-42.
    5. Mukesh Kumar & Vikas Kumar Choubey, 2023. "Sustainable Performance Assessment towards Sustainable Consumption and Production: Evidence from the Indian Dairy Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-28, July.
    6. Röös, Elin & Patel, Mikaela & Spångberg, Johanna, 2016. "Producing oat drink or cow's milk on a Swedish farm — Environmental impacts considering the service of grazing, the opportunity cost of land and the demand for beef and protein," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 23-32.
    7. Pemberton, Carlisle & Patterson-Andrews, Hazel & De Sormeaux, Afiya, 2016. "The Effects of Trade Liberalization on Dairy Trade and Domestic Milk Production in CARICOM," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(B), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Kabunga, Nassul, 2014. "Adoption and Impact of Improved Cow Breeds on Household Welfare and Child Nutrition Outcomes: Empirical Evidence from Uganda," 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France 170517, Agricultural Economics Society.
    9. Kumar, Anjani & Thapa, Ganesh & Joshi, Pramod Kumar & Roy, Devesh, 2016. "Adoption of food safety measures among Nepalese milk producers: Do smallholders benefit?:," IFPRI discussion papers 1556, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Oğuz Cennet & Yener Aysun, 2017. "Economic Analysis of Dairy Cattle Enterprises: The Case of Konya Province," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 263-273, June.
    11. Scott Bowman & Patrick Conway, 2013. "The Outlook for China’s Growth and its Impact on New Zealand Exports," Treasury Working Paper Series 13/16, New Zealand Treasury.
    12. Kabunga, Nassul S., 2014. "Improved dairy cows in Uganda: Pathways to poverty alleviation and improved child nutrition:," IFPRI discussion papers 1328, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Carletto, Calogero & Gourlay, Sydney & Murray, Siobhan & Zezza, Alberto, 2015. "Welcome to Fantasyland: Comparing Approaches To Land Area Measurement In Household Surveys," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211849, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:137:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-016-1686-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.