IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/chinre/v16y2023i3d10.1007_s12187-023-10010-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Best Interests of The Child Self-Report (BIC-S): Psychometric Properties of the Adapted Version of the BIC-S used as a Monitoring Instrument to Measure the Quality of The Children’s Rearing Environment From a Children’s Rights Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • A. Elianne Zijlstra

    (University of Groningen)

  • Wendy J. Post

    (University of Groningen)

  • Marit Hopman

    (Netherlands’ Ombudsman for Children)

  • Alexandra Jong

    (Netherlands’ Ombudsman for Children)

  • Margrite E. Kalverboer

    (The Groningen University Fund)

Abstract

Background In line with the legal duty to monitor the compliance of policy and practice with the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Netherlands’ Ombudsman for Children collects data concerning children’s views about their rearing environment and well-being. This Children’s Rights Monitor uses the Best Interests of the Child Self-Report (BIC-S). The psychometric properties of the BIC-S need to be further investigated. Method For the 2018 Children’s Rights Monitor, 1639 children (age: M = 12.05 SD = 2.70) completed the BIC-S (quality of rearing environment) and value their life on a scale of 1 to 10 (well-being). Mokken Scale Analysis was applied to determine the construct validity, and a Pearson correlation coefficient between well-being and the quality of rearing environment was used to determine the convergent validity of the BIC-S. Results The results of the Mokken Scale Analysis reveal an invariant, strong, and reliable family scale (H = 0.60; Rho = 0.88) and an invariant, moderate, and reliable society scale (H = 0.45; Rho = 0.81). Two conditions (safe wider physical environment and adequate examples in society) should be viewed as separate items. Strong and significant correlations are observed between well-being, on the one hand, and the family and society scales on the other (respectively, r = 0.54 and 0.63). Implications Results of this study point to a reliable and valid BIC-S for measuring the quality of the rearing environment. This instrument can be used to bring policy, practice, and decision-making in line with Children’s Rights.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Elianne Zijlstra & Wendy J. Post & Marit Hopman & Alexandra Jong & Margrite E. Kalverboer, 2023. "The Best Interests of The Child Self-Report (BIC-S): Psychometric Properties of the Adapted Version of the BIC-S used as a Monitoring Instrument to Measure the Quality of The Children’s Rearing Enviro," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(3), pages 1341-1361, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:16:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s12187-023-10010-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s12187-023-10010-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-023-10010-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12187-023-10010-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alun C Jackson & Rachel P‐T Liang & Erica Frydenberg & Rosemary O Higgins & Barbara M Murphy, 2016. "Parent education programmes for special health care needs children: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(11-12), pages 1528-1547, June.
    2. Wenqiang Sun & Dongping Li & Wei Zhang & Zhenzhou Bao & Yanhui Wang, 2015. "Family Material Hardship and Chinese Adolescents’ Problem Behaviors: A Moderated Mediation Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Gal, Tali, 2017. "An ecological model of child and youth participation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 57-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simmons-Horton, Sherri Y., 2017. "Providing age-appropriate activities for youth in foster care: Policy implementation process in three states," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 383-391.
    2. Gazit, Matan & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2020. "Disadvantaged youth’s participation in collective decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Duramy, Benedetta Faedi & Gal, Tali, 2020. "Understanding and implementing child participation: Lessons from the Global South," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Ahmad Fahme Mohd Ali & W.A. Amir Zal & Nurhanan Ab. Hamid & Tengku Fauzan Tengku Anuar & Hafizi Mat Salleh & Siti Asma Md. Rasdi, 2022. "The Moderating Effect of zakāh Distribution on the Economic Well-being of the Poor: An Analysis in Kelantan, Malaysia التأثير المعتدل لتوزيع الزكاة على الرفاهية الاقتصادية للفقراء: تحليل من ولاية كلان," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 35(1), pages 75-97, January.
    5. Mingwei Sun & Katarzyna Grondys & Nazim Hajiyev & Pavel Zhukov, 2021. "Improving the E-Commerce Business Model in a Sustainable Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Trbus, Marina & Zečević, Ivana & Wright, Laura Helen Virginia, 2023. "Perspectives of children and young people from Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina on their role in challenging perceived social and gender norms impacting school related gender-based violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Manou Anselma & Mai Chinapaw & Teatske Altenburg, 2020. "“Not Only Adults Can Make Good Decisions, We as Children Can Do That as Well” Evaluating the Process of the Youth-Led Participatory Action Research ‘Kids in Action’," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Esther Yin-Nei Cho, 2018. "Links between Poverty and Children’s Subjective Wellbeing: Examining the Mediating and Moderating Role of Relationships," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(2), pages 585-607, April.
    9. Elmore, Kristen C. & Sumner, Rachel & Tifft, Megan & Forstrom, Melanie A. & Burrow, Anthony L., 2019. "Building collaborative youth development research-practice partnerships through Cooperative Extension," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Kirsty Bastable & Paul Cooke & Lou Harvey & Victoria Olarte & Jodi Zimmerman & Shakila Dada, 2022. "How Are Leadership Programs Empowering Our Vulnerable Children and Youth? A Scoping Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Correia, Nadine & Camilo, Cláudia & Aguiar, Cecília & Amaro, Fausto, 2019. "Children's right to participate in early childhood education settings: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 76-88.
    12. Liu, Qianqian & Zhou, Nan & Cao, Hongjian & Hong, Xiumin, 2020. "Family socioeconomic status and Chinese young children’ social competence: Parenting processes as mediators and contextualizing factors as moderators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    13. Shamrova, Daria P. & Cummings, Cristy E., 2017. "Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: An integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organizations, and communities," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 400-412.
    14. Hanita Kosher, 2023. "The Relation Between Children's Participation in Their Daily life and Their Subjective Well-Being," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(5), pages 1827-1850, October.
    15. Strijbosch, E.L.L. & Wissink, I.B. & van der Helm, G.H.P. & Stams, G.J.J.M., 2019. "Building a positive group climate together: How monitoring instruments are part of an improvement process in residential care for children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 266-277.
    16. Lee, Laura & Currie, Vanessa & Saied, Neveen & Wright, Laura, 2020. "Journey to hope, self-expression and community engagement: Youth-led arts-based participatory action research," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Anu Kinnunen & Ira Jeglinsky & Nea Vänskä & Krista Lehtonen & Salla Sipari, 2021. "The Importance of Collaboration in Pediatric Rehabilitation for the Construction of Participation: The Views of Parents and Professionals," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-12, November.
    18. McPherson, Lynne & Vosz, Meaghan & Gatwiri, Kathomi & Parmenter, Natalie & Macnamara, Noel & Mitchell, Janise & Tucci, Joe, 2021. "What does research tell us about young people’s participation in decision making in residential care? A systematic scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:16:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s12187-023-10010-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.