IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v118y2020ics0190740920309695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family socioeconomic status and Chinese young children’ social competence: Parenting processes as mediators and contextualizing factors as moderators

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Qianqian
  • Zhou, Nan
  • Cao, Hongjian
  • Hong, Xiumin

Abstract

Based on data from 5,778 Chinese families with young children (13 to 36 months old), this study tested a model in which socioeconomic status (SES) was linked to child social competence through both parenting stress and positive parenting, and also examined whether this model varied as functions of three key contextualizing factors, including the number of children living in the household (i.e., one, two, or three), primary caregiver status (i.e., parents or grandparents), and living regions (i.e., urban, county, or rural). Overall, SES was found to be associated positively with child social competence via a negative association with parenting stress and a positive association with positive parenting; and patenting stress was also found to be negatively associated with positive parenting. Further, results of multi-group analyses indicated that: (a) across all contextualizing factor groups except for grandparent-headed families, parenting stress mediated the association between SES and social competence; (b) across all contextualizing factor groups except for the three-child families and the families living in the county areas, positive parenting served as a mediator between SES and social competence; and (c) SES was positively associated with social competence through parenting stress and positive parenting in one-child and two-child families, nuclear families, and urban and rural families, but not in three-child families, grandparent-headed families and county families. Our findings shed initial light on the understudied heterogeneity inherent within the link between SES and child socioemotional development in a Chinese cultural context, and also highlight some potential avenues for interventions aimed at promoting Chinese young children’ socioemotional development in low-SES family settings (i.e., intervening the parenting processes).

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Qianqian & Zhou, Nan & Cao, Hongjian & Hong, Xiumin, 2020. "Family socioeconomic status and Chinese young children’ social competence: Parenting processes as mediators and contextualizing factors as moderators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:118:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920309695
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740920309695
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Becker, Gary S & Tomes, Nigel, 1976. "Child Endowments and the Quantity and Quality of Children," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(4), pages 143-162, August.
    2. Peng Zhang & Mann Xu, 2011. "The View from the County: China's Regional Inequalities of Socio-Economic Development," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 12(1), pages 183-198, May.
    3. Mendelson, Tamar & Kubzansky, Laura D. & Datta, Geetanjali D. & Buka, Stephen L., 2008. "Relation of female gender and low socioeconomic status to internalizing symptoms among adolescents: A case of double jeopardy?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 1284-1296, March.
    4. Judith Blake, 1981. "Family size and the quality of children," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 18(4), pages 421-442, November.
    5. Brown, Philip H. & Park, Albert, 2002. "Education and poverty in rural China," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 523-541, December.
    6. Bingwen Zheng, 2016. "Population ageing and the impacts of the universal two-child policy on China’s socio-economy," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 434-453, October.
    7. Maher, Erin J. & Marcynyszyn, Lyscha A. & Corwin, Tyler W. & Hodnett, Rhenda, 2011. "Dosage matters: The relationship between participation in the Nurturing Parenting Program for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers and subsequent child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1426-1434, August.
    8. Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & McCoy, Dana Charles & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2018. "Relations between parenting practices, socioeconomic status, and child behavior in Brazil," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 93-102.
    9. Wenqiang Sun & Dongping Li & Wei Zhang & Zhenzhou Bao & Yanhui Wang, 2015. "Family Material Hardship and Chinese Adolescents’ Problem Behaviors: A Moderated Mediation Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Hermanns, Jo M.A. & Asscher, Jessica J. & Zijlstra, Bonne J.H. & Hoffenaar, Peter J. & Dekovič, Maja, 2013. "Long-term changes in parenting and child behavior after the Home-Start family support program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 678-684.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yue, Yaping & Huang, Jinjiao & Yuan, Haojie & Zhao, Yifei & Lei, Jiayuan & Fan, Jieqiong, 2024. "The mediating role of Self-Competence in the relationship between parental involvement and support and Children’s social Skills: Evidence from China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Power, Thomas G. & Wong, Mun, 2021. "Chinese mother’s scaffolding of young children’s responses to stress and children’s depressive symptoms during the first year of primary school," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Jie Ji & Xiaoyue Sun & Zhiwen Zhang & Yingyan Cai, 2023. "Socioeconomic Status and Child Quality of Life: The Mediating Roles of Parenting Practices," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(3), pages 1073-1095, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuang Chen, 2020. "Parental Investment After the Birth of a Sibling: The Effect of Family Size in Low-Fertility China," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(6), pages 2085-2111, December.
    2. Hongbin Li & Junsen Zhang & Yi Zhu, 2008. "The quantity-Quality trade-Off of children In a developing country: Identification using chinese twins," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(1), pages 223-243, February.
    3. Nooshin Rashti Mohammad & Ali Taieb Nia & Sajjad Barkhordari, 2024. "The Casual Effect of Family Size on the Human Capital in Iranian Society," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4056-4071, March.
    4. Kieron Barclay & Torkild Lyngstad & Dalton Conley, 2018. "The Production of Inequalities within Families and Across Generations: The Intergenerational Effects of Birth Order and Family Size on Educational Attainment," NBER Working Papers 24530, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Alice Grinberg, 2015. "The Effect of Birth Order on Occupational Choice," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 43(4), pages 463-476, December.
    6. de Haan, Monique, 2010. "Birth order, family size and educational attainment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 576-588, August.
    7. Lucio Esposito & Sunil Mitra Kumar & Adrián Villaseñor, 2020. "The importance of being earliest: birth order and educational outcomes along the socioeconomic ladder in Mexico," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 1069-1099, July.
    8. Ronni Pavan, 2016. "On the Production of Skills and the Birth-Order Effect," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 51(3), pages 699-726.
    9. Jere R. Behrman, 1994. "Intra-family Distribution in Developing Countries," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 253-296.
    10. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Thanh-Hang Pham & Trung Tran & Thu-Trang Vuong & Nguyen Manh Cuong & Nguyen Phuc Khanh Linh & Viet-Phuong La & Manh Toan Ho, 2020. "STEM education and outcomes in Vietnam: Views from the social gap and gender issues," Working Papers CEB 20-003, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Zhao, Qiran & Wang, Xiaobing & Rozelle, Scott, 2019. "Better cognition, better school performance? Evidence from primary schools in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 199-217.
    12. Meltem Dayioğlu & Murat G. Kirdar & Aysit Tansel, 2009. "Impact of Sibship Size, Birth Order and Sex Composition on School Enrolment in Urban Turkey," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 71(3), pages 399-426, June.
    13. Shuang Chen, 2022. "The Positive Effect of Women’s Education on Fertility in Low-Fertility China," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(1), pages 125-161, March.
    14. Bu, Feifei, 2014. "Sibling configurations, educational aspiration and attainment," ISER Working Paper Series 2014-11, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    15. Kieron J. Barclay & Torkild H. Lyngstad & Dalton Conley, 2018. "The production of inequalities within families and across generations: the intergenerational effects of birth order and family size on educational attainment," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2018-002, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    16. Shige Song & Weidong Wang, 2019. "Testing the Only-Child Advantage in Cognitive Development in the Context of China’s One-Child Policy," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(6), pages 841-867, December.
    17. Wang, Haining & Cheng, Zhiming, 2022. "Kids eat free: School feeding and family spending on education," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 196-212.
    18. Bansak, Cynthia & Jiang, Xuan & Yang, Guanyi, 2022. "Sibling spillovers in rural China: A story of sisters," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    19. Mookerjee, Mehreen & Ojha, Manini & Roy, Sanket, 2023. "Family planning practices: Examining the link between contraception and child health," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    20. David Mmopelwa, 2019. "Household size, birth order and child health in Botswana," Discussion Papers 2019-10, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:118:y:2020:i:c:s0190740920309695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.