Author
Listed:
- Jonathan Brock
(Fraunhofer Institute for Mechatronic Systems Design IEM)
- Katharina Brennig
(Paderborn University)
- Bernd Löhr
(Paderborn University)
- Christian Bartelheimer
(Paderborn University)
- Sebastian Enzberg
(Fraunhofer Institute for Mechatronic Systems Design IEM)
- Roman Dumitrescu
(Fraunhofer Institute for Mechatronic Systems Design IEM)
Abstract
Process mining is advancing as a powerful tool for revealing valuable insights about process dynamics. Nevertheless, the imperative to employ process mining to enhance process transparency is a prevailing concern for organizations. Despite the widespread desire to integrate process mining as a pivotal catalyst for fostering a more agile and flexible Business Process Management (BPM) environment, many organizations face challenges in achieving widespread implementation and adoption due to deficiencies in various dimensions of process mining readiness. The current Information Systems (IS) knowledge base lacks a comprehensive framework to aid organizations in augmenting their process mining readiness and bridging this intention-action gap. The paper presents a Process Mining Maturity Model (P3M), refined through multiple iterations, which outlines five factors and 23 elements that organizations must address to increase their process mining readiness. The maturity model advances the understanding of how to close the intention-action gap of process mining initiatives in multiple dimensions. Furthermore, insights from a comprehensive analysis of data gathered in eleven qualitative interviews are drawn, elucidating 30 possible actions that organizations can implement to establish a more responsive and dynamic BPM environment by means of process mining.
Suggested Citation
Jonathan Brock & Katharina Brennig & Bernd Löhr & Christian Bartelheimer & Sebastian Enzberg & Roman Dumitrescu, 2024.
"Improving Process Mining Maturity – From Intentions to Actions,"
Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 585-605, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:binfse:v:66:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s12599-024-00882-7
DOI: 10.1007/s12599-024-00882-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:66:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s12599-024-00882-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.