IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/binfse/v66y2024i2d10.1007_s12599-023-00837-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Power of Ethics: Uncovering Technology Risks and Positive Value Potentials in IT Innovation Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Kathrin Bednar

    (Vienna University of Economics and Business)

  • Sarah Spiekermann

    (Vienna University of Economics and Business)

Abstract

The digital transformation of the economy is accelerating companies’ engagement in information technology (IT) innovation. To anticipate which technologies will become relevant over time and integrate them in their innovation plans, companies often rely on product roadmaps as strategic tools. However, ethical issues resulting from ubiquitous IT use have shown the need to accommodate hyped technical advancements in information systems (IS) design and acknowledge human values with moral relevance. Scholars have argued that this moral relevance can only come from an ethical framework. The empirical study presented here investigates whether the three ethical theories of utilitarianism, virtue ethics, and deontology can complement traditional innovation planning approaches. The mixed-method study covers three IT products – a digital toy, a food-delivery app and a telemedicine system. The results reveal that the three ethical theories boost creativity around values and enrich IT innovation planning by supporting the acknowledgment of more and higher value principles (e.g., freedom or personal growth), more diverse value classes (e.g., individual and social values) as well as more original values (e.g., human contact) in system design. What is more, participants identify and mitigate potential social and ethical issues associated with the IT product. Against this background, the findings in this paper suggest that a “value-based roadmapping” approach could be a vital stimulus for future IT innovation planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathrin Bednar & Sarah Spiekermann, 2024. "The Power of Ethics: Uncovering Technology Risks and Positive Value Potentials in IT Innovation Planning," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(2), pages 181-201, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:66:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12599-023-00837-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12599-023-00837-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12599-023-00837-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12599-023-00837-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Helbing & Farzam Fanitabasi & Fosca Giannotti & Regula Hänggli & Carina I. Hausladen & Jeroen van den Hoven & Sachit Mahajan & Dino Pedreschi & Evangelos Pournaras, 2021. "Ethics of Smart Cities: Towards Value-Sensitive Design and Co-Evolving City Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Shi, Yuwei & Herniman, John, 2023. "The role of expectation in innovation evolution: Exploring hype cycles," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Erez, Miriam & Nouri, Rikki, 2010. "Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 351-370, November.
    4. Eoin O’Sullivan & Rob Phaal & Charles Featherston, 2021. "Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 65-81.
    5. E.C. Martins & F. Terblanche, 2003. "Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 64-74, March.
    6. Spiekermann, Sarah & Krasnova, Hanna & Hinz, Oliver & Baumann, Annika & Benlian, Alexander & Gimpel, Henner & Heimbach, Irina & Köster, Antonia & Maedche, Alexander & Niehaves, Björn & Risius, Marten , 2022. "Values and Ethics in Information Systems – A State-of-the-Art Analysis and Avenues for Future Research," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 130842, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Irene Van Staveren, 2007. "Beyond Utilitarianism and Deontology: Ethics in Economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 21-35.
    8. Kirsten Martin & Katie Shilton & Jeffery Smith, 2019. "Business and the Ethical Implications of Technology: Introduction to the Symposium," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 307-317, December.
    9. Sungjoo Lee & Kook Jin Jang & Myung Han Lee & Seong Ryong Shin, 2021. "Roadmapping in the Era of Uncertainty: How to Integrate Data-Driven Methods with Expert Insights," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 39-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niyi Ogunbiyi & Artie Basukoski & Thierry Chaussalet, 2021. "An Exploration of Ethical Decision Making with Intelligence Augmentation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Stephanie Kelley, 2022. "Employee Perceptions of the Effective Adoption of AI Principles," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 871-893, July.
    3. Terry R. Adler & Thomas G. Pittz & Hank B. Strevel & Dina Denney & Susan D. Steiner & Elizabeth S. Adler, 2022. "Team Over-Empowerment in Market Research: A Virtue-Based Ethics Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 159-173, February.
    4. Harsman Tandilittin, 2016. "What should the Government do to Stop Epidemic of Smoking among Teenagers in Indonesia?," Asian Culture and History, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 140-140, March.
    5. Tatjana Hödl & Thomas Myrach, 2023. "Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(5), pages 497-519, October.
    6. Swaab, Roderick I. & Galinsky, Adam D., 2015. "Egalitarianism makes organizations stronger: Cross-national variation in institutional and psychological equality predicts talent levels and the performance of national teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 80-92.
    7. R. Rajesh, 2023. "Grey Markov Models for Predicting the Social Sustainability Performances of Firms," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 297-351, August.
    8. Brenda Nguyen & Mary Crossan, 2022. "Character-Infused Ethical Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 171-191, June.
    9. Alipour, Ali & Yaprak, Attila, 2022. "Indulgence and risk-taking behavior of firms: Direct and interactive influences," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2).
    10. Albert D. Spalding & Gretchen R. Lawrie, 2019. "A Critical Examination of the AICPA’s New “Conceptual Framework” Ethics Protocol," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 1135-1152, April.
    11. Atasi Mohanty, 2015. "Information Processing and Creative Thinking Abilities of Residential and Non-Residential School Children," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, October.
    12. Matthias Trier & Dennis Kundisch & Daniel Beverungen & Oliver Müller & Guido Schryen & Milad Mirbabaie & Simon Trang, 2023. "Digital Responsibility," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(4), pages 463-474, August.
    13. Sachit Mahajan & Ming-Kuang Chung & Jenny Martinez & Yris Olaya & Dirk Helbing & Ling-Jyh Chen, 2022. "Translating citizen-generated air quality data into evidence for shaping policy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Evgenia I. Lysova & Jennifer Tosti-Kharas & Christopher Michaelson & Luke Fletcher & Catherine Bailey & Peter McGhee, 2023. "Ethics and the Future of Meaningful Work: Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(4), pages 713-723, July.
    15. Timothy C. Johnson, 2013. "Reciprocity as the foundation of Financial Economics," Papers 1310.2798, arXiv.org.
    16. Benedetta Giovanola, 2009. "Re-Thinking the Anthropological and Ethical Foundation of Economics and Business: Human Richness and Capabilities Enhancement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(3), pages 431-444, September.
    17. Byung‐Gak Son & Jörg M. Ries & Nachiappan Subramanian & Seongtae Kim, 2024. "Bridging the innovation gap: Why organizational climate matters for leveraging innovation from supply networks," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 60(2), pages 39-63, April.
    18. Timothy C. Johnson, 2012. "Ethics and Finance: the role of mathematics," Papers 1210.5390, arXiv.org.
    19. Yates, J. Frank & de Oliveira, Stephanie, 2016. "Culture and decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 106-118.
    20. Vecchietti, Giuseppe & Liyanaarachchi, Gajendra & Viglia, Giampaolo, 2025. "Managing deepfakes with artificial intelligence: Introducing the business privacy calculus," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:66:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12599-023-00837-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.