IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jscmgt/v60y2024i2p39-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the innovation gap: Why organizational climate matters for leveraging innovation from supply networks

Author

Listed:
  • Byung‐Gak Son
  • Jörg M. Ries
  • Nachiappan Subramanian
  • Seongtae Kim

Abstract

Recent studies have provided empirical evidence that innovation performance is related to the way a firm is embedded in its supply network, specifically the centrality of its network position, but it remains unclear why some firms can use inputs from suppliers better than others, despite having comparable structural characteristics in their supply networks. Drawing on theories of social networks and organizational climate, this study examines the role of buying firms' organizational climate for innovation. It uses several structured and unstructured datasets for S&P 500 firms and applies count regression models to test hypotheses. Supply network data from FactSet were analyzed to determine the degree centrality of a buying firm. Computer‐aided content analysis was used to capture the organizational climate of buying firms based on online employee reviews collected from Glassdoor. The results suggest a positive relationship between the degree centrality and the innovation performance of buying firms. Moreover, certain facets of the organizational climate related to learning, including rewards and career progress, as well as work pressure management, affect the link between the degree centrality of a buying firm and its innovation performance. In conclusion, this study enhances the understanding of the connection between supply networks and innovation. It highlights the crucial role of a firm‐level factor, specifically the influential facets of organizational climate for learning, in determining innovation performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Byung‐Gak Son & Jörg M. Ries & Nachiappan Subramanian & Seongtae Kim, 2024. "Bridging the innovation gap: Why organizational climate matters for leveraging innovation from supply networks," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 60(2), pages 39-63, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:60:y:2024:i:2:p:39-63
    DOI: 10.1111/jscm.12316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12316
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jscm.12316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Son, Byung-Gak & Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, Canan & Roden, Sinéad, 2016. "A dyadic perspective on retailer–supplier relationships through the lens of social capital," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 120-131.
    2. Tim Rowley & Dean Behrens & David Krackhardt, 2000. "Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 369-386, March.
    3. Geoffrey G. Bell, 2005. "Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 287-295, March.
    4. E.C. Martins & F. Terblanche, 2003. "Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 64-74, March.
    5. Bruce Kogut & Udo Zander, 1992. "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 383-397, August.
    6. Corey C. Phelps, 2010. "A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation," Post-Print hal-00528392, HAL.
    7. Son, Byung-Gak & Lee, Chang-Hun & Ha, Byoung-Chun & Nam, Hyunjeong, 2019. "Investigating the fair treatment of suppliers and its trust fostering role and performance benefits," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 54-66.
    8. Pervaiz K. Ahmed, 1998. "Culture and climate for innovation," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(1), pages 30-43, April.
    9. Henrich R. Greve, 2009. "Bigger and safer: the diffusion of competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 1-23, January.
    10. Helena Yli‐Renko & Erkko Autio & Harry J. Sapienza, 2001. "Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology‐based firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 587-613, June.
    11. Robert E. Quinn & John Rohrbaugh, 1983. "A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 363-377, March.
    12. Sachin B. Modi & David E. Cantor, 2021. "How Coopetition Influences Environmental Performance: Role of Financial Slack, Leverage, and Leanness," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2046-2068, July.
    13. Arturs Kalnins, 2018. "Multicollinearity: How common factors cause Type 1 errors in multivariate regression," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(8), pages 2362-2385, August.
    14. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2015. "Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 420-445.
    15. Giovanna Culot & Matteo Podrecca & Guido Nassimbeni & Guido Orzes & Marco Sartor, 2023. "Using supply chain databases in academic research: A methodological critique," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(1), pages 3-25, January.
    16. Bernard L Simonin, 2004. "An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 35(5), pages 407-427, September.
    17. Dietmar Harhoff & Stefan Wagner, 2009. "The Duration of Patent Examination at the European Patent Office," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(12), pages 1969-1984, December.
    18. Mazzola, Erica & Perrone, Giovanni & Kamuriwo, Dzidziso Samuel, 2015. "Network embeddedness and new product development in the biopharmaceutical industry: The moderating role of open innovation flow," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 106-119.
    19. Sande, Jon Bingen & Ghosh, Mrinal, 2018. "Endogeneity in survey research," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 185-204.
    20. Maggie Chuoyan Dong & Zhiqiang Liu & Yimin Yu & Jin-Hui Zheng, 2015. "Opportunism in Distribution Networks: The Role of Network Embeddedness and Dependence," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(10), pages 1657-1670, October.
    21. M S Sodhi & B-G Son, 2010. "Content analysis of OR job advertisements to infer required skills," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(9), pages 1315-1327, September.
    22. Yan Xie & Shanxing Gao & Xu Jiang & Carl F. Fey, 2015. "Social Ties and Indigenous Innovation in China's Transition Economy: The Moderating Effects of Learning Intent," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 79-101, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wonsang Ryu & Thomas H. Brush & Joonhyung Bae, 2023. "How agglomeration affects alliance governance and innovation performance: The role of cluster size," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 297-310, January.
    2. Lee, Cheng-Yu & Wang, Ming-Chao & Huang, Yen-Chih, 2015. "The double-edged sword of technological diversity in R&D alliances: Network position and learning speed as moderators," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 450-461.
    3. Avimanyu Datta, 2011. "Combining Networks, Ambidexterity and Absorptive Capacity to Explain Commercialization of Innovations: A Theoretical Model from Review and Extension," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(4), pages 2-25, December.
    4. Haifeng Wang & Pengfei Han & Weishu Liu, 2018. "How to Improve Sustainable Competitive Advantage from the Distributor and the Supplier Networks: Evidence from the Paper-Making Industry in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Dong-Young Kim & Pengcheng Zhu & Wenli Xiao & Yen-Ting Lin, 2020. "Customer degree centrality and supplier performance: the moderating role of resource dependence," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 22-38, June.
    6. Kim, Yusoon & Choi, Thomas Y., 2021. "Supplier relationship strategies and outcome dualities: An empirical study of embeddedness perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Schøtt, Thomas & Jensen, Kent Wickstrøm, 2016. "Firms’ innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of national and firm effects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1233-1246.
    8. Jiménez-Jiménez, Daniel & Sanz-Valle, Raquel, 2011. "Innovation, organizational learning, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 408-417, April.
    9. Manuela Presutti & Giuseppe Cappiello & Martin Johanson, 2022. "Analysing Social Capital and Product Innovativeness in the Relationship Evolution of Born-Global Companies the Mediating Role of Knowledge Acquisition," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1347-1371, September.
    10. Casanueva, Cristóbal & Castro, Ignacio & Galán, José L., 2013. "Informational networks and innovation in mature industrial clusters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 603-613.
    11. Bai, Xuan & Wang, Qingtao & Sheng, Shibin & Li, Julie Juan, 2021. "Cross-level interpersonal ties and IJV innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 618-630.
    12. Li, Li, 2005. "The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries' intra- and inter-organizational relationships," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 77-95, February.
    13. Sharma, Amalesh & Pathak, Surya & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Adhikary, Anirban, 2022. "Collaboration strategies in buyer-supplier relational (BSR) networks and sustainable firm performance: A trade-off story," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    14. Zhang, JingJing & Yan, Yan & Guan, JianCheng, 2019. "Recombinant distance, network governance and recombinant innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 260-272.
    15. Manuela Presutti & Giuseppe Cappiello & Martin Johanson, 0. "Analysing Social Capital and Product Innovativeness in the Relationship Evolution of Born-Global Companies the Mediating Role of Knowledge Acquisition," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-25.
    16. Haahti, Antti & Madupu, Vivekananda & Yavas, Ugur & Babakus, Emin, 2005. "Cooperative strategy, knowledge intensity and export performance of small and medium sized enterprises," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 124-138, May.
    17. Maggie Chuoyan Dong & Fue Zeng & Chenting Su, 2019. "Network embeddedness as a dependence-balancing mechanism in developing markets: differential effects for channel partners with asymmetric dependencies," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1064-1084, November.
    18. Zihanxin Li & Guilong Zhu, 2021. "Knowledge Transfer Performance of Industry-University-Research Institute Collaboration in China: The Moderating Effect of Partner Difference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Pan, Mengyang & Chen, Qiong & Xiao, Wenli, 2024. "Antecedents of radical innovation speed from a knowledge network perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    20. Soh, Pek-Hooi, 2003. "The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implications for new product performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 727-744, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:60:y:2024:i:2:p:39-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1523-2409 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.