IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ariqol/v17y2022i2d10.1007_s11482-021-09921-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of the Quality of Life in Youth Services Scale (QOLYSS): Content-Related Validity Evidence Based on Adolescents’ and Expert Reviewers’ Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Swerts

    (HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts)

  • Laura E. Gómez

    (University of Oviedo)

  • Jessica Maeyer

    (HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts)

  • Goedele Nil

    (HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts)

  • Wouter Vanderplasschen

    (Ghent University)

Abstract

Despite increased interest in the quality of life of younger populations, the quality of life of youngsters in vulnerable situations such as those in youth services remains under-researched. To gain insight into critical ingredients for understanding and enhancing the lives of these youngsters, appropriate assessment tools are needed. This study focuses on providing content-related validity evidence for the new Quality of Life in Youth Services Scale (QOLYSS) for adolescents in youth services. A sequential approach to item generation, refinement, and evaluation is presented. The initial item bank is devised by means of a thorough literature search and evaluated against findings from qualitative research among adolescents in youth services. In addition, a three-round international expert panel (N = 5) is convened to align identified items to the adopted quality of life framework, and to provide evidence on domain representation and relevance. Last, input is collected from adolescents in youth services themselves. More specifically, 20 group discussions and 13 individual interview sessions are organized to support 21 adolescents in critically assessing the content of the item bank on level of relevance, clarity, and coverage. The expert panel resulted in a provisional scale of 262 unique items that, based on adolescents’ input, is further reduced to a set of 88 items. Adolescents omitted items because of divergent reasons (e.g., content-overlap, self-evident character of the items, level of irrelevance). Explanatory qualitative information on the item selection process is provided. This study provides a detailed understanding of the content-related validity evidence of a new multidimensional quality of life scale. Moreover, it highlights the importance of acknowledging youngsters as critical partner in quality of life research and assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Swerts & Laura E. Gómez & Jessica Maeyer & Goedele Nil & Wouter Vanderplasschen, 2022. "Development of the Quality of Life in Youth Services Scale (QOLYSS): Content-Related Validity Evidence Based on Adolescents’ and Expert Reviewers’ Perspectives," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 593-612, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:17:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11482-021-09921-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11482-021-09921-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11482-021-09921-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11482-021-09921-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert L. Schalock & Ruth Luckasson & Karrie A. Shogren, 2020. "Going beyond Environment to Context: Leveraging the Power of Context to Produce Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Schalock, Robert L. & Verdugo, Miguel Angel & Gomez, Laura E., 2011. "Evidence-based practices in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: An international consensus approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 273-282, August.
    3. Stephen Sireci, 1998. "The Construct of Content Validity," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 83-117, November.
    4. Laura Gómez & Elsa Peña & Benito Arias & Miguel Verdugo, 2016. "Impact of Individual and Organizational Variables on Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 649-664, January.
    5. Chris Swerts & Jessica De Maeyer & Marco Lombardi & Inge Waterschoot & Wouter Vanderplasschen & Claudia Claes, 2019. "“You Shouldn’t Look at Us Strangely”: An Exploratory Study on Personal Perspectives on Quality of Life of Adolescents with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Residential Youth Care," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(4), pages 867-889, September.
    6. Claudia Claes & Geert Hove & Jos Loon & Stijn Vandevelde & Robert Schalock, 2010. "Quality of Life Measurement in the Field of Intellectual Disabilities: Eight Principles for Assessing Quality of Life-Related Personal Outcomes," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 61-72, August.
    7. Toby Fattore & Jan Mason & Elizabeth Watson, 2007. "Children’s conceptualisation(s) of their well-being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 5-29, January.
    8. Asher Ben-Arieh, 2005. "Where are the Children? Children’s Role in Measuring and Monitoring Their Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 573-596, December.
    9. Nele Van Hecke & Claudia Claes & Wouter Vanderplasschen & Jessica De Maeyer & Nico De Witte & Stijn Vandevelde, 2018. "Conceptualisation and Measurement of Quality of Life Based on Schalock and Verdugo’s Model: A Cross-Disciplinary Review of the Literature," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 335-351, May.
    10. María Fernández & Miguel Ángel Verdugo & Laura E. Gómez & Virginia Aguayo & Benito Arias, 2018. "Core Indicators to Assess Quality of Life in Population with Brain Injury," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 813-828, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mª Lucía Morán & Laura E. Gómez & Giulia Balboni & Alice Bacherini & Asunción Monsalve, 2024. "Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy and Intellectual Disability: Predictors and Personal Outcomes," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(1), pages 123-143, February.
    2. Chris Swerts & Laura E. Gómez & Margo Dewitte & Jessica Maeyer & Wouter Vanderplasschen, 2023. "Quality of Life Outcomes for Adolescents in Youth Care," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(5), pages 1987-2011, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Swerts & Laura E. Gómez & Margo Dewitte & Jessica Maeyer & Wouter Vanderplasschen, 2023. "Quality of Life Outcomes for Adolescents in Youth Care," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(5), pages 1987-2011, October.
    2. Satish Kumar & Filomena Maggino & Raj V. Mahto & Riya Sureka & Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Weng Marc Lim, 2022. "Social Indicators Research: A Retrospective Using Bibliometric Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 413-448, July.
    3. Mason, Jan & Hood, Suzanne, 2011. "Exploring issues of children as actors in social research," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 490-495, April.
    4. Pınar Uyan-Semerci & Emre Erdoğan, 2017. "Child Well-Being Indicators Through the Eyes of Children in Turkey: A Happy Child Would be One Who…," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 10(1), pages 267-295, March.
    5. Laura Camfield & Gina Crivello & Martin Woodhead, 2009. "Wellbeing Research in Developing Countries: Reviewing the Role of Qualitative Methods," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 5-31, January.
    6. Tobia Fattore & Susann Fegter & Christine Hunner-Kreisel, 2019. "Children’s Understandings of Well-Being in Global and Local Contexts: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations for a Multinational Qualitative Study," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(2), pages 385-407, April.
    7. Laura Gómez & Elsa Peña & Benito Arias & Miguel Verdugo, 2016. "Impact of Individual and Organizational Variables on Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 649-664, January.
    8. Yuki Ninomiya & Mariko Matsumoto & Asuka Nomura & Lauri Kemppinen & Dandii Odgerel & Soili Keskinen & Esko Keskinen & Nergui Oyuntungalag & Hiroko Tsuboi & Nobuko Suzuki & Chie Hatagaki & Yutaka Fukui, 2021. "A Cross-Cultural Study of Happiness in Japanese, Finnish, and Mongolian Children: Analysis of the Sentence Completion Test," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(2), pages 871-896, April.
    9. Christine Gervais & Johanne Thomson-Sweeny & Naïmé Daoust-Zidane & Maude Campeau & Isabel Côté, 2024. "Metaphorical Dialogue: an Innovative Strategy for Capturing Children’s Experience of Subjective Well-being," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(1), pages 419-443, February.
    10. Haridhan Goswami & Christopher Fox & Gary Pollock, 2016. "The Current Evidence Base and Future Needs in Improving Children’s Well-Being Across Europe: is There a Case for a Comparative Longitudinal Survey?," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(2), pages 371-388, June.
    11. Silvia Exenberger & Raphaela Banzer & Jayakumar Christy & Stefan Höfer & Barbara Juen, 2019. "Eastern and Western Children’s Voices on their Well-Being," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(3), pages 747-768, June.
    12. Lore Van Damme & Wouter Vanderplasschen & Clare-Ann Fortune & Stijn Vandevelde & Olivier F. Colins, 2021. "Determinants of Female Adolescents’ Quality of Life Before, during and after Detention: a Four-Wave Follow-Up Study Examining a Theory of Individual Quality of Life," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(1), pages 401-434, February.
    13. Dorota Strózik & Tomasz Strózik & Krzysztof Szwarc, 2016. "The Subjective Well-Being of School Children. The First Findings from the Children’s Worlds Study in Poland," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(1), pages 39-50, March.
    14. Chris Swerts & Jessica De Maeyer & Marco Lombardi & Inge Waterschoot & Wouter Vanderplasschen & Claudia Claes, 2019. "“You Shouldn’t Look at Us Strangely”: An Exploratory Study on Personal Perspectives on Quality of Life of Adolescents with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Residential Youth Care," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(4), pages 867-889, September.
    15. K. Purdam & P. Troncoso & A. Morales-Gomez & G. Leckie, 2024. "Local Geographic Variations in Children’s School Readiness - A Multilevel Analysis of the Development Gaps in England," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(1), pages 145-176, February.
    16. Mónica Domínguez-Serrano & Lucía Moral Espín, 2018. "From Relevant Capabilities to Relevant Indicators: Defining an Indicator System for Children’s Well-Being in Spain," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Kate Sollis & Ben Edwards, 2022. "Measuring What Matters: Drawing on a Participatory Wellbeing Framework and Existing Data to Assess Child Wellbeing Outcomes Over Time," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 543-599, November.
    18. Bernadette Huyer-May & Claudia Schmiedeberg & Nina Schumann, 2018. "Neighborhood Effects on Children’s Subjective Deprivation: Are Poor Children’s Perceptions of the Economic Situation in their Home Influenced by their Neighborhood?," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(1), pages 291-305, February.
    19. Ben-Arieh, Asher, 2006. "Is the study of the "State of our children" changing? Re-visiting after 5 years," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 799-811, July.
    20. Cécile Fanton d’Andon & Claire Greene & Catherine Pellenq & Tesfahun Melese Yilma & Muriel Champy & Mark Canavera & Chiara Pasquini, 2022. "Child Labor and Psychosocial Wellbeing: Findings from Ethiopia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:17:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11482-021-09921-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.