IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v45y1998i1p83-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Construct of Content Validity

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Sireci

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Sireci, 1998. "The Construct of Content Validity," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 83-117, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:45:y:1998:i:1:p:83-117
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1006985528729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1006985528729
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1006985528729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dahlberg, Tomi & Öörni, Anssi, 2006. "Finnish consumers' expectations on developments and changes in payment habits: survey in connection with the research project "Finnish payment habits 2010"," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 32/2006, Bank of Finland.
    2. Marios Trigkas & Glykeria Karagouni, 2023. "State/Academia Key Stakeholders’ Perceptions Regarding Bioeconomy: Evidence from Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Chris Swerts & Laura E. Gómez & Jessica Maeyer & Goedele Nil & Wouter Vanderplasschen, 2022. "Development of the Quality of Life in Youth Services Scale (QOLYSS): Content-Related Validity Evidence Based on Adolescents’ and Expert Reviewers’ Perspectives," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 593-612, April.
    4. Lígia Passos & João Tavares & Daniela Figueiredo, 2021. "Assessing Caregivers’ Skills in Assisting People with Dementia during Mealtime: Portuguese Cultural Adaptation of the Feeding Skills Checklist," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Selcuk Beduk, 2018. "Missing the Unhealthy? Examining Empirical Validity of Material Deprivation Indices (MDIs) Using a Partial Criterion Variable," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 91-115, January.
    6. Dahlberg, Tomi & Öörni, Anssi, 2006. "Finnish consumers' expectations on developments and changes in payment habits : survey in connection with the research project "Finnish payment habits 2010"," Research Discussion Papers 32/2006, Bank of Finland.
    7. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2006_032 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Bruno Damásio & Nelson Hauck-Filho & Sílvia Koller, 2016. "Measuring Meaning in Life: An Empirical Comparison of Two Well-Known Measures," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 431-445, February.
    9. Trinidad Luque-Vara & Marta Linares-Manrique & Elisabet Fernández-Gómez & Adelina Martín-Salvador & María Angustias Sánchez-Ojeda & Carmen Enrique-Mirón, 2020. "Content Validation of an Instrument for the Assessment of School Teachers’ Levels of Knowledge of Diabetes through Expert Judgment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Gary F. Gebhardt & François A. Carrillat & Robert J. Riggle & William B. Locander, 2020. "A Market-Based Procedure for Assessing and Improving Content Validity," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 7(1), pages 19-41, June.
    11. Sheppard, Leah D. & O'Reilly, Jane & van Dijke, Marius & Restubog, Simon Lloyd D. & Aquino, Karl, 2020. "The stress-relieving benefits of positively experienced social sexual behavior in the workplace," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 38-52.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:45:y:1998:i:1:p:83-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.