IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ariqol/v16y2021i2d10.1007_s11482-019-09791-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personality, Luck Beliefs, and (Non-?) Problem Lottery Gambling

Author

Listed:
  • Edmund R. Thompson

    (University of Bath)

  • Gerard P. Prendergast

    (Hong Kong Baptist University)

  • Gerard H. Dericks

    (Oxford Brookes University)

Abstract

This study offers both the first systematic investigation of the relationship between the five-factor personality model and general (ostensibly non-problem) lottery gambling, and the first application of Thompson and Prendergast’s (2013) bidimensional model of luck beliefs to gambling behavior. Cross-sectional analyses (N = 844) indicate the bidimensional model of luck beliefs significantly accounts for variance in lottery gambling that is discrete from and greater than that of the five-factor personality model. Moreover, the broad pattern of relationships we find between presumably harmless state-sponsored lottery gambling and both personality and luck beliefs tend to parallel those found in studies of problem gambling, suggesting implications for quality of life and public policy in relation to lottery gambling.

Suggested Citation

  • Edmund R. Thompson & Gerard P. Prendergast & Gerard H. Dericks, 2021. "Personality, Luck Beliefs, and (Non-?) Problem Lottery Gambling," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 703-722, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:16:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11482-019-09791-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11482-019-09791-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11482-019-09791-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11482-019-09791-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levi Pérez & Brad R. Humphreys, 2011. "The Income Elasticity of Lottery: New Evidence from Micro Data," Public Finance Review, , vol. 39(4), pages 551-570, July.
    2. Michael A. Trousdale & Richard A. Dunn, 2014. "Demand for Lottery Gambling: Evaluating Price Sensitivity Within a Portfolio of Lottery Games," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 67(3), pages 595-620, September.
    3. Murat Yücel & Sarah Whittle & George J. Youssef & Himani Kashyap & Julian G. Simmons & Orli Schwartz & Dan I. Lubman & Nicholas B. Allen, 2015. "The influence of sex, temperament, risk-taking and mental health on the emergence of gambling: a longitudinal study of young people," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 108-123, April.
    4. Jonathan Guryan & Melissa S. Kearney, 2010. "Is Lottery Gambling Addictive?," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 2(3), pages 90-110, August.
    5. Anise M.S. Wu & Vivienne Y.K. Tao & Kwok-kit Tong & Shu Fai Cheung, 2012. "Psychometric evaluation of the inventory of Gambling Motives, Attitudes and Behaviours (GMAB) among Chinese gamblers," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 331-347, March.
    6. Vishal Chandr Jaunky & Bhooshan Ramchurn, 2014. "Consumer behaviour in the scratch card market: a double-hurdle approach," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 96-114, August.
    7. Humphreys, Brad R. & Perez, Levi, 2013. "Syndicated play in lottery games," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 124-131.
    8. Catherine So-kum Tang & Anise M.S. Wu, 2009. "Screening for college problem gambling in Chinese societies: psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (C-SOGS)," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 263-274, December.
    9. Heather Wardle & Alison Moody & Mark Griffiths & Jim Orford & Rachel Volberg, 2011. "Defining the online gambler and patterns of behaviour integration: evidence from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 339-356, December.
    10. Garrick Blalock & David R. Just & Daniel H. Simon, 2007. "Hitting the Jackpot or Hitting the Skids: Entertainment, Poverty, and the Demand for State Lotteries," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 545-570, July.
    11. Ashley McInnes & David C. Hodgins & Alice Holub, 2014. "The Gambling Cognitions Inventory: scale development and psychometric validation with problem and pathological gamblers," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 410-431, December.
    12. Andrew B. Carver & John A. McCarty, 2013. "Personality and psychographics of three types of gamblers in the United States," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 338-355, December.
    13. Anne Jones Dorn & Daniel Dorn & Paul Sengmueller, 2015. "Trading as Gambling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(10), pages 2376-2393, October.
    14. Brett L. Abarbanel, 2014. "Differences in motivational dimensions across gambling frequency, game choice and medium of play in the United Kingdom," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 472-491, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Di Wang & Frank McGroarty, 2022. "Does perfectionism influence individual financial risk tolerance and financial well-being? Evidence from an online survey data from the US," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(11), pages 1-32, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kent R. Grote & Victor A. Matheson, 2014. "The Impact of State Lotteries and Casinos on State Bankruptcy Filings," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 121-135, March.
    2. Juan R Barrada & Juan F Navas & Cristian M Ruiz de Lara & Joël Billieux & Gaëtan Devos & José C Perales, 2019. "Reconsidering the roots, structure, and implications of gambling motives: An integrative approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Frank Crowley & John Eakins & Declan Jordan, 2012. "Participation,Expenditure and Regressivity in the Irish Lottery:Evidence from Irish Household Budget Survey 2004/2005," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 43(2), pages 199-225.
    4. Robin Maximilian Stetzka & Stefan Winter, 2023. "How rational is gambling?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1432-1488, September.
    5. Wang, Xiaoxiao, 2024. "Bank affiliation and lottery-like characteristics of mutual funds," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 944-963.
    6. Wang, Albert Y. & Young, Michael, 2023. "Mood, attention, and household trading: Evidence from terrorist attacks," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Zhiming Cheng & Russell Smyth & Gong Sun, 2013. "Participation and Expenditure of Rural-Urban Migrants in the Illegal Lottery in China," Monash Economics Working Papers 24-13, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    8. Oded Stark, 2020. "Relative deprivation as a cause of risky behaviors," The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 138-146, July.
    9. Agrawal, David R. & Trandel, Gregory A., 2019. "Dynamics of policy adoption with state dependence," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. David Boto-García & Alvaro Muñiz-Fernández & Levi Pérez, 2024. "Windfall money and outbound tourism: A natural experiment from lottery winnings," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(5), pages 1257-1280, August.
    11. Jiang, Yuan & House, Lisa A., 2017. "Comparison of the Performance of Count Data Models under Different Zero-Inflation Scenarios Using Simulation Studies," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258342, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Zhao, Xiaojuan & Wang, Ye & Liu, Weiyi, 2024. "Someone like you: Lottery-like preference and the cross-section of expected returns in the cryptocurrency market," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Guimaraes, Bernardo & Pannella, Pierluca, 2024. "Short-covering bubbles," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Ferri, Giovanni & Lagravinese, Raffaele & Resce, Giuliano, 2024. "Inequality and Gambling," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp24095, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    15. Brochado, Ana & Santos, Maria & Oliveira, Fernando & Esperança, José, 2018. "Gambling behavior: Instant versus traditional lotteries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 560-567.
    16. Ethan Grumstrup & Mark W. Nichols, 2021. "Is video gambling terminal placement and spending in Illinois correlated with neighborhood characteristics?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(2), pages 273-298, October.
    17. Avery Haviv & Yufeng Huang & Nan Li, 2020. "Intertemporal Demand Spillover Effects on Video Game Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4788-4807, October.
    18. Frans Folkvord & Cristiano Codagnone & Francesco Bogliacino & Giuseppe Veltri & Francisco Lupiañez-Villanueva & Andriy Ivchenko & George Gaskell, 2019. "Experimental evidence on measures to protect consumers of online gambling services," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 3(1), pages 20-29, March.
    19. Aidan R. Vining & David L. Weimer, 2013. "An assessment of important issues concerning the application of benefit–cost analysis to social policy," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 1, pages 25-62, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Eran Rubin & Amir Rubin, 2021. "On the economic effects of the text completion interface: empirical analysis of financial markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 717-735, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:16:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11482-019-09791-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.