IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v41y2024i4d10.1007_s10460-024-10570-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Safer to plant corn and beans”? Navigating the challenges and opportunities of agricultural diversification in the U.S. Corn Belt

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Traldi

    (Purdue University)

  • Lauren Asprooth

    (Purdue University)

  • Emily M. Usher

    (Purdue University)

  • Kristin Floress

    (USDA Forest Service)

  • J. Gordon Arbuckle

    (Iowa State University)

  • Megan Baskerville

    (The Nature Conservancy)

  • Sarah P. Church

    (Montana State University)

  • Ken Genskow

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Seth Harden

    (The Nature Conservancy)

  • Elizabeth T. Maynard

    (Purdue University)

  • Aaron William Thompson

    (Purdue University)

  • Ariana P. Torres

    (Purdue University)

  • Linda S. Prokopy

    (Purdue University)

Abstract

Agricultural diversification in the Midwestern Corn Belt has the potential to improve socioeconomic and environmental outcomes by buffering farmers from environmental and economic shocks and improving soil, water, and air quality. However, complex barriers related to agricultural markets, individual behavior, social norms, and government policy constrain diversification in this region. This study examines farmer perspectives regarding the challenges and opportunities for both corn and soybean production and agricultural diversification strategies. We analyze data from 20 focus groups with 100 participants conducted in Indiana, Illinois, and Iowa through a combined inductive and deductive approach, drawing upon interpretive grounded theory. Our results suggest that when identifying challenges and opportunities, participants center economics and market considerations, particularly income, productivity, and market access. These themes are emphasized both as benefits of the current corn-soybean system, as well as challenges for diversification. Additionally, logistical, resource and behavioral hurdles– including the comparative difficulty and time required to diversify, and constraints in accessing land, labor, and technical support– are emphasized by participants as key barriers to diversification. Agricultural policies shape these challenges, enhancing the comparative advantage and decreasing the risk of producing corn and soybeans as compared to diversified products. Meanwhile, alternative marketing arrangements, farmer networks, family relationships, and improved soil health are highlighted as important opportunities for diversification. We contextualize our findings within the theories of reasoned action and diffusion of innovation, and explore their implications for farmer engagement, markets, and agricultural policy, and the development of additional resources for business and technical support.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Traldi & Lauren Asprooth & Emily M. Usher & Kristin Floress & J. Gordon Arbuckle & Megan Baskerville & Sarah P. Church & Ken Genskow & Seth Harden & Elizabeth T. Maynard & Aaron William Thomps, 2024. "“Safer to plant corn and beans”? Navigating the challenges and opportunities of agricultural diversification in the U.S. Corn Belt," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(4), pages 1687-1706, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:41:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10460-024-10570-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10460-024-10570-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-024-10570-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10460-024-10570-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:41:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10460-024-10570-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.