IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/advdac/v18y2024i3d10.1007_s11634-023-00572-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust and sparse logistic regression

Author

Listed:
  • Dries Cornilly

    (KU Leuven
    Asteria IM)

  • Lise Tubex

    (University of Antwerp - imec)

  • Stefan Van Aelst

    (KU Leuven)

  • Tim Verdonck

    (KU Leuven
    University of Antwerp - imec)

Abstract

Logistic regression is one of the most popular statistical techniques for solving (binary) classification problems in various applications (e.g. credit scoring, cancer detection, ad click predictions and churn classification). Typically, the maximum likelihood estimator is used, which is very sensitive to outlying observations. In this paper, we propose a robust and sparse logistic regression estimator where robustness is achieved by means of the $$\gamma$$ γ -divergence. An elastic net penalty ensures sparsity in the regression coefficients such that the model is more stable and interpretable. We show that the influence function is bounded and demonstrate its robustness properties in simulations. The good performance of the proposed estimator is also illustrated in an empirical application that deals with classifying the type of fuel used by cars.

Suggested Citation

  • Dries Cornilly & Lise Tubex & Stefan Van Aelst & Tim Verdonck, 2024. "Robust and sparse logistic regression," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 18(3), pages 663-679, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:advdac:v:18:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11634-023-00572-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11634-023-00572-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11634-023-00572-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11634-023-00572-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hung Hung & Zhi†Yu Jou & Su†Yun Huang, 2018. "Robust mislabel logistic regression without modeling mislabel probabilities," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 145-154, March.
    2. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    3. Alfons, Andreas & Croux, Christophe & Gelper, Sarah, 2016. "Robust groupwise least angle regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 421-435.
    4. Ana M. Bianco & Graciela Boente & Gonzalo Chebi, 2022. "Penalized robust estimators in sparse logistic regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 563-594, September.
    5. Cevallos-Valdiviezo, Holger & Van Aelst, Stefan, 2019. "Fast computation of robust subspace estimators," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 171-185.
    6. Howard D. Bondell, 2005. "Minimum distance estimation for the logistic regression model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(3), pages 724-731, September.
    7. Fujisawa, Hironori & Eguchi, Shinto, 2008. "Robust parameter estimation with a small bias against heavy contamination," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(9), pages 2053-2081, October.
    8. Marco Avella-Medina & Elvezio Ronchetti, 2018. "Robust and consistent variable selection in high-dimensional generalized linear models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(1), pages 31-44.
    9. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    10. Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2010. "Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i01).
    11. Khan, Jafar A. & Van Aelst, Stefan & Zamar, Ruben H., 2010. "Fast robust estimation of prediction error based on resampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3121-3130, December.
    12. Croux, Christophe & Haesbroeck, Gentiane, 2003. "Implementing the Bianco and Yohai estimator for logistic regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 273-295, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana M. Bianco & Graciela Boente & Gonzalo Chebi, 2022. "Penalized robust estimators in sparse logistic regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 563-594, September.
    2. Luca Insolia & Ana Kenney & Martina Calovi & Francesca Chiaromonte, 2021. "Robust Variable Selection with Optimality Guarantees for High-Dimensional Logistic Regression," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-17, August.
    3. G. S. Monti & P. Filzmoser, 2022. "Robust logistic zero-sum regression for microbiome compositional data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(2), pages 301-324, June.
    4. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    5. Mkhadri, Abdallah & Ouhourane, Mohamed, 2013. "An extended variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithm for correlated variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 631-644.
    6. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Stefan Wager, 2018. "Approximate residual balancing: debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(4), pages 597-623, September.
    7. Chuliá, Helena & Garrón, Ignacio & Uribe, Jorge M., 2024. "Daily growth at risk: Financial or real drivers? The answer is not always the same," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 762-776.
    8. Christopher J Greenwood & George J Youssef & Primrose Letcher & Jacqui A Macdonald & Lauryn J Hagg & Ann Sanson & Jenn Mcintosh & Delyse M Hutchinson & John W Toumbourou & Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &, 2020. "A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Immanuel Bayer & Philip Groth & Sebastian Schneckener, 2013. "Prediction Errors in Learning Drug Response from Gene Expression Data – Influence of Labeling, Sample Size, and Machine Learning Algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, July.
    10. Mostafa Rezaei & Ivor Cribben & Michele Samorani, 2021. "A clustering-based feature selection method for automatically generated relational attributes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 233-263, August.
    11. Gustavo A. Alonso-Silverio & Víctor Francisco-García & Iris P. Guzmán-Guzmán & Elías Ventura-Molina & Antonio Alarcón-Paredes, 2021. "Toward Non-Invasive Estimation of Blood Glucose Concentration: A Comparative Performance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Christopher Kath & Florian Ziel, 2018. "The value of forecasts: Quantifying the economic gains of accurate quarter-hourly electricity price forecasts," Papers 1811.08604, arXiv.org.
    13. Karim Barigou & Stéphane Loisel & Yahia Salhi, 2020. "Parsimonious Predictive Mortality Modeling by Regularization and Cross-Validation with and without Covid-Type Effect," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Gurgul Henryk & Machno Artur, 2017. "Trade Pattern on Warsaw Stock Exchange and Prediction of Number of Trades," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 18(1), pages 91-114, March.
    15. Michael Funke & Kadri Männasoo & Helery Tasane, 2023. "Regional Economic Impacts of the Øresund Cross-Border Fixed Link: Cui Bono?," CESifo Working Paper Series 10557, CESifo.
    16. Camila Epprecht & Dominique Guegan & Álvaro Veiga & Joel Correa da Rosa, 2017. "Variable selection and forecasting via automated methods for linear models: LASSO/adaLASSO and Autometrics," Post-Print halshs-00917797, HAL.
    17. Zichen Zhang & Ye Eun Bae & Jonathan R. Bradley & Lang Wu & Chong Wu, 2022. "SUMMIT: An integrative approach for better transcriptomic data imputation improves causal gene identification," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Štefan Lyócsa & Petra Vašaničová & Branka Hadji Misheva & Marko Dávid Vateha, 2022. "Default or profit scoring credit systems? Evidence from European and US peer-to-peer lending markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Peter Bühlmann & Jacopo Mandozzi, 2014. "High-dimensional variable screening and bias in subsequent inference, with an empirical comparison," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 407-430, June.
    20. Peter Martey Addo & Dominique Guegan & Bertrand Hassani, 2018. "Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advdac:v:18:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11634-023-00572-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.