IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/annals/i32y2013p43-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Generalized Owen Value for Voting Games in Partition Function Form

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Ekes

    (Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie)

Abstract

In the paper we present an application of the generalized Owen value, defined in our former work, for partition function form games. We apply this value to simple games, modeling multicandidate or multioptional voting. We also present an example of application of this concept to measuring the voting power of deputies in the Polish Sejm.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Ekes, 2013. "Application of Generalized Owen Value for Voting Games in Partition Function Form," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 32, pages 43-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:32:y:2013:p:43-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rocznikikae.sgh.waw.pl/p/roczniki_kae_z32_04.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André Casajus, 2009. "The Shapley Value, The Owen Value, And The Veil Of Ignorance," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(04), pages 453-457.
    2. Edward M. Bolger, 2000. "A consistent value for games with n players and r alternatives," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 29(1), pages 93-99.
    3. Hart, Sergiu & Mas-Colell, Andreu, 1989. "Potential, Value, and Consistency," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 589-614, May.
    4. Pham Do, K.H. & Norde, H.W., 2002. "The Shapley Value for Partition Function Form Games," Other publications TiSEM ce6adde5-aa01-46fd-a043-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Bolger, E M, 1989. "A Set of Axioms for a Value for Partition Function Games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 18(1), pages 37-44.
    6. Bolger, Edward M, 1993. "A Value for Games with n Players and r Alternatives," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 22(4), pages 319-334.
    7. R. M. Thrall & W. F. Lucas, 1963. "N‐person games in partition function form," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 281-298, March.
    8. Hart, Sergiu & Kurz, Mordecai, 1983. "Endogenous Formation of Coalitions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(4), pages 1047-1064, July.
    9. Edward M. Bolger, 2002. "Characterizations of two power indices for voting games with r alternatives," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 19(4), pages 709-721.
    10. Macho-Stadler, Ines & Perez-Castrillo, David & Wettstein, David, 2007. "Sharing the surplus: An extension of the Shapley value for environments with externalities," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 339-356, July.
    11. Justyna Winnicka, 2010. "Indeks Shapleya dla gier z wieloma rozstrzygnięciami z prekoalicjami," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 22, pages 97-115.
    12. Chun, Youngsub, 1989. "A new axiomatization of the shapley value," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 119-130, June.
    13. Kim Hang Pham Do & Henk Norde, 2007. "The Shapley Value For Partition Function Form Games," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 353-360.
    14. Bolger, E M, 1986. "Power Indices for Multicandidate Voting Games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 15(3), pages 175-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. László Á. Kóczy, 2018. "Partition Function Form Games," Theory and Decision Library C, Springer, number 978-3-319-69841-0, March.
    2. M. Álvarez-Mozos & O. Tejada, 2015. "The Banzhaf value in the presence of externalities," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(4), pages 781-805, April.
    3. Geoffroy de Clippel & Roberto Serrano, 2008. "Marginal Contributions and Externalities in the Value," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(6), pages 1413-1436, November.
    4. Casajus, André & Funaki, Yukihiko & Huettner, Frank, 2024. "Random partitions, potential, value, and externalities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 88-106.
    5. Effrosyni Diamantoudi & Inés Macho-Stadler & David Pérez-Castrillo & Licun Xue, 2015. "Sharing the surplus in games with externalities within and across issues," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 60(2), pages 315-343, October.
    6. Andr'e Casajus & Yukihiko Funaki & Frank Huettner, 2024. "Random partitions, potential, value, and externalities," Papers 2402.00394, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    7. Dutta, Bhaskar & Ehlers, Lars & Kar, Anirban, 2010. "Externalities, potential, value and consistency," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(6), pages 2380-2411, November.
    8. Ander Perez-Orive & Andrea Caggese, 2017. "Capital Misallocation and Secular Stagnation," 2017 Meeting Papers 382, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    9. Takaaki Abe, 2020. "Population monotonic allocation schemes for games with externalities," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(1), pages 97-117, March.
    10. McQuillin, Ben, 2009. "The extended and generalized Shapley value: Simultaneous consideration of coalitional externalities and coalitional structure," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 696-721, March.
    11. J. M. Alonso-Meijide & M. Álvarez-Mozos & M. G. Fiestras-Janeiro & A. Jiménez-Losada, 2021. "Marginality and convexity in partition function form games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 94(1), pages 99-121, August.
    12. Grabisch, Michel & Funaki, Yukihiko, 2012. "A coalition formation value for games in partition function form," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 175-185.
    13. Michel Grabisch, 2010. "The lattice of embedded subsets," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00457827, HAL.
    14. Macho-Stadler, Inés & Pérez-Castrillo, David & Wettstein, David, 2018. "Values for environments with externalities – The average approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 49-64.
    15. David Wettstein & David Pérez-Castrillo & Inés Macho-Stadler, 2017. "Extensions of the Shapley value for Environments with Externalities," Working Papers 1002, Barcelona School of Economics.
    16. Peter Borm & Yukihiko Funaki & Yuan Ju, 2020. "The Balanced Threat Agreement for Individual Externality Negotiation Problems," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 67-85, November.
    17. Frank Huettner & André Casajus, 2019. "Marginality, dividends, and the value in games with externalities," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-19-01, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    18. Grabisch, Michel & Rusinowska, Agnieszka, 2011. "Influence functions, followers and command games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 123-138, May.
    19. Yuan Ju, 2007. "The Consensus Value For Games In Partition Function Form," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 437-452.
    20. Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2010. "A model of influence with an ordered set of possible actions," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 635-656, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:32:y:2013:p:43-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Bernardelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.