IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/annals/i22y2010p97-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indeks Shapleya dla gier z wieloma rozstrzygnięciami z prekoalicjami

Author

Listed:
  • Justyna Winnicka

    (Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie)

Abstract

W niniejszej pracy przedstawiono cztery metody przedłużenia indeksu Shapleya na klasę gier z wieloma rozstrzygnięciami z prekoalicjami. Pierwsze dwie oparte są na klasycznej konstrukcji Owena zastosowanej do pewnej gry kooperacyjnej związanej z grą z wieloma rozstrzygnięciami. Dwie pozostałe polegają na przeprowadzeniu konstrukcji analogicznej do konstrukcji Owena bezpośrednio na wyjściowej grze z wieloma rozstrzygnięciami. Dwie przedstawione metody zostały odrzucone jako prowadzące do wyników sprzecznych ze zdrowym rozsądkiem. Pokazano, że dwie pozostałe prowadzą do tego samego indeksu.

Suggested Citation

  • Justyna Winnicka, 2010. "Indeks Shapleya dla gier z wieloma rozstrzygnięciami z prekoalicjami," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 22, pages 97-115.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:22:y:2010:p:97-115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Ekes, 2013. "Application of Generalized Owen Value for Voting Games in Partition Function Form," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 32, pages 43-53.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:22:y:2010:p:97-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Bernardelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.