IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sdo/regaec/v26y2017i2_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tendencies, Problems And Prospects Of The Balanced And Competitive Development Of Agrarian Entrepreneurship In Russia

Author

Listed:
  • I.P. DOVBIY
  • I.V. MITROFANOVA
  • E.G. RUSSKOVA
  • E.A. SHKARUPA
  • V.V. BATMANOVA
  • I.A. MITROFANOVA

Abstract

The article displays basic problems and it studies prospects of the development of the agrarian entrepreneurship in contemporary Russia. Under the conditions of the foreign economic sanctions, respective Russian counter sanctions and the Russian direction of a large scale import substitution it is necessary to start the activity in the field of the creation of the conditions for the modernization of agrarian technologies of production, in the creation of highly qualified information and analytical services, in the training the personnel for the farming, in the increase of the arable surface for working entrepreneurs doing business in the agricultural sphere. Such measures like the increase and qualitative improvement of public grasslands and hayfields for cattle from private subsidiary farms, development of agricultural cooperation in gathering, storage, processing, formation of lots of goods and the selling of the production of farms and private subsidiary farms, development of the infrastructure and logistic provision of rural areas will allow creating conditions for a competitive and balanced development of the agricultural business.

Suggested Citation

  • I.P. Dovbiy & I.V. Mitrofanova & E.G. Russkova & E.A. Shkarupa & V.V. Batmanova & I.A. Mitrofanova, 2017. "Tendencies, Problems And Prospects Of The Balanced And Competitive Development Of Agrarian Entrepreneurship In Russia," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 26(2), pages 97-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:26:y:2017:i:2_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.usc.gal/index.php/rge/article/view/4328
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre Boulanger & Hasan Dudu & Emanuele Ferrari & George Philippidis, 2016. "Russian Roulette at the Trade Table: A Specific Factors CGE Analysis of an Agri-food Import Ban," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 272-291, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zrar Mohsin Mohammadali & Sabir Sadiq Abdulkhaliq, 2019. "Prospects And Challenges Of Entrepreneurship Development In The Kurdistan Region Of Iraq: An Overview," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 7(2), pages 4-16, December.
    2. Siti Afni ANISAH & Lestari Rahayu WALUYATI & Agus Dwi NUGROHO, 2021. "Could A New Agricultural Auction Market Implement A Good Marketing Mix?," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 181-191, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zamani, Omid & Chibanda, Craig & Pelikan, Janine, 2021. "Investigating Alternative Poultry Trade Policies in the Context of African Countries: Evidence from Ghana," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315173, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Banse, Martin & Duric, Ivan & Götz, Linde & Laquai, Verena, 2019. "From the Russian food import ban to free trade from Lisbon to Vladivostok - will farmers benefit?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 20-31.
    3. Hinz, Julian & Monastyrenko, Evgenii, 2022. "Bearing the cost of politics: Consumer prices and welfare in Russia," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Angela Cheptea & Carl Gaigné, 2020. "Russian food embargo and the lost trade [Nonparametric counterfactual predictions in neoclassical models of international trade]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(2), pages 684-718.
    5. SZÁNTÓ László & SZÜCS István & SZÖLLÖSI László, 2020. "Economics Of Milk Production In 2010-2016 €“ A Hungarian Case Study," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 586-596, July.
    6. Mario Larch & Jeff Luckstead & Yoto V. Yotov, 2024. "Economic sanctions and agricultural trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(4), pages 1477-1517, August.
    7. Zamani, Omid & Chibanda, Craig & Pelikan, Janine, 2020. "Tariff Escalation and Import Bans in the Economic Partnership Agreement between the EU and West Africa," Conference papers 333239, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Aragie, Emerta & Pauw, Karl & Pernechele, Valentina, 2018. "Achieving food security and industrial development in Malawi: Are export restrictions the solution?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-15.
    9. Jakub Horak, 2021. "Sanctions as a Catalyst for Russia’s and China’s Balance of Trade: Business Opportunity," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Mikhail Krivko & Luboš Smutka, 2020. "Trade Sanctions and Agriculture Support in Milk and Dairy Industry: Case of Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Hyytiä Nina, 2020. "Russian Food Import Ban – Impacts on Rural and Regional Development in Finland," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 506-526, December.
    12. Jurkėnaitė, Nelė & Djuric, Ivan, 2018. "Impact of the Russian trade bans on Lithuanian pork sector," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 40(4), pages 481-491.
    13. MASSIANI, Jérôme, 2022. "Computable General Equilibrium assessment of mega-events: Issues and possible solutions," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 920-942.
    14. Askar Nailevich Mustafin & Svetlana Nikolaevna Kotenkova & Ivana Kravčáková Vozárová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2022. "Impact of Import Substitution Policy on Economic Growth," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Amzul Rifin & Feryanto & Herawati & Harianto, 2020. "Assessing the impact of limiting Indonesian palm oil exports to the European Union," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Isabel Knößlsdorfer & Matin Qaim, 2023. "Cheap chicken in Africa: Would import restrictions be pro-poor?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(3), pages 791-804, June.
    17. Duric, I. & Glauben, T. & Zaric, V., 2018. "Impact of the Russian agricultural import ban on the Serbian pork exports and domestic price development along the pork value chain," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277201, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Klomp, Jeroen, 2020. "The impact of Russian sanctions on the return of agricultural commodity futures in the EU," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    19. Tleubayev, Alisher & Jamali Jaghdani, Tinoush & Götz, Linde & Svanidze, Miranda, 2021. "The relationship between trade policies and macroeconomic adjustments in the Russian cheese market integration," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 22(3), pages 44-68.
    20. Zornitsa Kutlina-Dimitrova, 2017. "The economic impact of the Russian import ban: a CGE analysis," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 537-552, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agriculture; agrarian entrepreneurship; private subsidiary farms; farms; food supply security; governmental support; state programs; regulation; target financing; development; efficiency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:26:y:2017:i:2_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marisa Chas-Amil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.