IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2017i5p128-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Методика оценки премии в сделках слияния и поглощения на развивающихся рынках для частных компаний // The Method of Estimating the Premium in Mergers and Acquisitions in Emerging Markets for Private Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Ryabova V.

    (National Research University “Higher School of Economics”)

  • Valentina Petrova V.

    (National Research University “Higher School of Economics”)

  • Елена Рябова Вячеславовна

    (Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»)

  • Валентина Петрова Владимировна

    (Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»)

Abstract

Introduction. In the context of globalization of economies mergers and acquisitions (in short M&A) are becoming increasingly important in business, as a strategic development of companies. M&A deals, as a rule, are assessed for their efficiency for acquiring company and/or for target-company. There are a lot of papers and empirical studies on this subject. However, most of them concern public companies with shares listed on the stock exchange.Moreover, in the last decade M&A deals were most typical for private owned companies operating in an emerging capital market. Due to the imperfections of an emerging capital market, lack of available and reliable information about private target-companies, investors need a methodology able to take into account these features of the market, to more reasonably calculate the transaction price and the premium in its structure.Topic. As the object of the study we analyse mergers and acquisitions in the countries of the BRICS group (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) for 2005–2015.Purpose. The purpose of this study is development of methodological apparatus for assessment of premiums in M&A transactions for private companies in emerging capital markets.Methods. As research methods were used general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, comparison, graphics), and special ones (statistical analysis methods, the coefficient method).Results. In this article we present the author’s approach to the assessment of fair market value and premiums in M&A transactions with private companies in emerging capital markets. We also conducted testing of proposed methodology.Implementation. The proposed methodology can be used by both external and internal analysts to calculate and justify the premium in deals with private companies in emerging capital markets. Введение. В условиях глобализации экономик сделки слияния и поглощения (mergers and acquisitions, M&A) приобретают все большую актуальность в бизнесе в качестве стратегического развития компаний. Сделки M&A, как правило, оцениваются на предмет их эффективности для компаний-покупателей и/или компанийцелей. Существует достаточно много работ и эмпирических исследований, посвященных данному направлению. Однако большая их часть осуществлена для публичных компаний, имеющих акции, котирующиеся на бирже. При этом в последние десятилетие сделки M&A более актуальны для частных компаний, функционирующих на развивающемся рынке капитала. В силу несовершенства развивающегося рынка капитала, отсутствия доступной и достоверной информации о частной компании-цели инвесторам требуется методика, способная учесть данные особенности рынка, чтобы более обоснованно рассчитать цену сделки и премию в ее структуре.Предмет. В качестве объекта исследования выступили сделки слияний и поглощений в странах группы БРИКС (Бразилия, Россия, Индия, Китай, ЮАР) за 2005–2015 гг.Цель. В этой связи цель работы заключается в разработке методологического аппарата по оценке премий в сделках M&A для частных компаний развивающихся рынков капитала. Методы. В качестве методов исследования использовались как общенаучные методы исследования (анализ, синтез, сравнение, графический), так и специальные (статистические методы анализа, коэффициентный метод).Результаты. В данной статье предложен авторский подход к оценке справедливой рыночной стоимости и премии в сделках M&A с частными компаниями на развивающихся рынках капитала, проведена апробация методики.Область применения результатов. Предложенная методика может быть использована как внешними, так и внутренними аналитиками для расчета и обоснования премии в сделках с частными компаниями на развивающихся рынках капитала.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Ryabova V. & Valentina Petrova V. & Елена Рябова Вячеславовна & Валентина Петрова Владимировна, 2017. "Методика оценки премии в сделках слияния и поглощения на развивающихся рынках для частных компаний // The Method of Estimating the Premium in Mergers and Acquisitions in Emerging Markets for Private C," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 21(5), pages 128-139.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2017:i:5:p:128-139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/579/447.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ивашковская И. В. & Шамраева С. А. & Григориади Е. Е., 2009. "Эмпирический Анализ Эффективности Корпоративной Диверсификации На Растущих Рынках Капитала На Примере Группы Брик," Higher School of Economics Economic Journal Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 13(3), pages 360-382.
    2. Martin Bugeja & Raymond da Silva Rosa, 2008. "Taxation of shareholder capital gains and the choice of payment method in takeovers," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 331-350.
    3. Martynova, Marina & Renneboog, Luc, 2008. "A century of corporate takeovers: What have we learned and where do we stand?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 2148-2177, October.
    4. Moeller, Sara B. & Schlingemann, Frederik P. & Stulz, Rene M., 2004. "Firm size and the gains from acquisitions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 201-228, August.
    5. Alexandridis, George & Fuller, Kathleen P. & Terhaar, Lars & Travlos, Nickolaos G., 2013. "Deal size, acquisition premia and shareholder gains," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Roll, Richard, 1986. "The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(2), pages 197-216, April.
    7. Nancy Huyghebaert & Mathieu Luypaert, 2013. "Value creation and division of gains in horizontal acquisitions in Europe: the role of industry conditions," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(14), pages 1819-1833, May.
    8. Flanagan, David J. & O'Shaughnessy, K. C., 2003. "Core-related acquisitions, multiple bidders and tender offer premiums," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 573-585, August.
    9. Vijay Gondhalekar & R. Raymond Sant & Stephen Ferris, 2004. "The price of corporate acquisition: determinants of cash takeover premia," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(12), pages 735-739.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandridis, G. & Antypas, N. & Travlos, N., 2017. "Value creation from M&As: New evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 632-650.
    2. Sean Cleary & Ashrafee Hossain, 2020. "POSTCRISIS M&As AND THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 43(2), pages 407-454, May.
    3. Renneboog, Luc & Vansteenkiste, Cara, 2019. "Failure and success in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 650-699.
    4. Martin Bugeja & Anna Loyeung, 2017. "Accounting for business combinations and takeover premiums: Pre- and post-IFRS," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(2), pages 183-204, May.
    5. Barbopoulos, Leonidas G. & Adra, Samer & Saunders, Anthony, 2020. "Macroeconomic news and acquirer returns in M&As: The impact of investor alertness," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Hu, Nan & Li, Lu & Li, Hui & Wang, Xing, 2020. "Do mega-mergers create value? The acquisition experience and mega-deal outcomes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 119-142.
    7. Gurmeet S. Bhabra & Harjeet S. Bhabra & Ashrafee T. Hossain, 2022. "CEO inside debt and the acquisition of private targets," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2163-2202, June.
    8. Çömez-Dolgan, Nagihan & Tanyeri, Başak, 2015. "Inventory performance with pooling: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 331-339.
    9. Ott, Christian, 2020. "The risks of mergers and acquisitions—Analyzing the incentives for risk reporting in Item 1A of 10-K filings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 158-181.
    10. Wolfgang Bessler & Colin Schneck, 2015. "Excess premium offers and bidder success in European takeovers," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(1), pages 23-62, June.
    11. Schneck, Colin & Bessler, Wolfgang & Zimmermann, Jan, 2014. "Bidder Contests in International Mergers and Acquisitions: The Impact of Toeholds, Preemptive Bidding, and Termination Fees," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100493, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Yousry Ahmed & Tamer Elshandidy, 2021. "Effect of leverage deviation on choices and outcomes of public versus non‐public acquisitions," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 3436-3459, July.
    13. Guo, Jie & Li, Xi & Seeger, Nicolas Cisternas & Vagenas-Nanos, Evangelos, 2019. "Social connections, reference point and acquisition premium," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 46-71.
    14. Defrancq, Corneel & Huyghebaert, Nancy & Luypaert, Mathieu, 2016. "Influence of family ownership on the industry-diversifying nature of a firm’s M&A strategy: Empirical evidence from Continental Europe," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 210-226.
    15. Claire E. Ashton-James & Killian J. McCarthy & Anca Dranca-Iacoban, 2011. "Power, and the Destruction of Value in Mergers and Acquisitions," Chapters, in: Killian J. McCarthy & Maya Fiolet & Wilfred Dolfsma (ed.), The Nature of the New Firm, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. García, C. José & Herrero, Begoña, 2022. "Corporate entrepreneurship and governance: Mergers and acquisitions in Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Bhabra, Harjeet S. & Huang, Jiayin, 2013. "An empirical investigation of mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies, 1997–2007," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 186-207.
    18. Wang, Ying & Lahr, Henry, 2017. "Takeover law to protect shareholders: Increasing efficiency or merely redistributing gains?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 288-315.
    19. Ahmed, Rizwan & Chen, Yawen & Benjasak, Chonlakan & Gregoriou, Andros & Nahar Falah Alrwashdeh, Nusiebeh & Than, Ei Thuzar, 2023. "The performance of bidding companies in merger and acquisition deals: An empirical study of domestic acquisitions in Hong Kong and Mainland China," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 168-180.
    20. Bilei Zhou & Jie (Michael) Guo & Jun Hua & Angelos J. Doukas, 2015. "Does State Ownership Drive M&A Performance? Evidence from China," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 21(1), pages 79-105, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2017:i:5:p:128-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.