IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v38y2024i5p1223-1243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wage Effects of Couples’ Divisions of Labour across the UK Wage Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Niels Blom

    (City, University of London, UK)

  • Lynn Prince Cooke

    (University of Bath, UK)

Abstract

Specialisation and gender theories offer competing hypotheses of whether men’s and women’s wages rise or fall based on the couple’s division of household unpaid and paid labour, and how effects differ across the wage distribution. We test division effects by analysing British panel data using unconditional quantile regression with individual fixed effects, controlling for own hours in housework and employment. We find only high-wage men’s wages were significantly greater when their partners specialised in routine housework, and when they were the sole breadwinner. Conversely, low- and high-wage partnered women incurred significant wage penalties as their share of housework exceeded their partners’. Wages for low-wage men and median- and high-wage women also decreased as their share of household employment increased. We conclude only elite partnered men benefit from specialisation. Everyone else is either better off or no worse off with equitable household divisions of paid and unpaid work.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels Blom & Lynn Prince Cooke, 2024. "Wage Effects of Couples’ Divisions of Labour across the UK Wage Distribution," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(5), pages 1223-1243, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:5:p:1223-1243
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170231180818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170231180818
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170231180818?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:5:p:1223-1243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.