IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v38y2024i4p976-997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Basically He’s a Pet, Not a Working Dog’: Theorising What Therapy Dogs Do in the Workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Nickie Charles

    (University of Warwick, UK)

  • Carol Wolkowitz

    (University of Warwick, UK)

Abstract

This article takes the case of therapy dogs who visit hospitals, care homes, schools and universities in Britain and asks whether we should conceptualise what they are doing as work. Marx defined the capacity to work as what sets humankind apart from other animals, but more recent analysts see similarities between animals and humans in their capacity to work. Animal work is often defined through training and the acquisition of skills; for therapy dogs, however, training is not required, and their skills go unrecognised. Drawing on a study of therapy dog visits to a British university and using a methodology that attends to the experiences of the dogs as well as the human actors, we argue that therapy dogs engage in emotional work and body work and that the concepts of ‘encounter value’ and ‘feeling power’ need to be deployed to theorise the work they are doing.

Suggested Citation

  • Nickie Charles & Carol Wolkowitz, 2024. "‘Basically He’s a Pet, Not a Working Dog’: Theorising What Therapy Dogs Do in the Workplace," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(4), pages 976-997, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:4:p:976-997
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170231161495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170231161495
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170231161495?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Lara Cohen & Carol Wolkowitz, 2018. "The Feminization of Body Work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 42-62, January.
    2. Nickie Charles & Carol Wolkowitz, 2019. "Bringing dogs onto campus: Inclusions and exclusions of animal bodies in organizations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 303-321, April.
    3. Rosemary-Claire Collard & Jessica Dempsey, 2013. "Life for Sale? The Politics of Lively Commodities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(11), pages 2682-2699, November.
    4. Erika Cudworth, 2022. "Labors of love: Work, labor, and care in dog–human relations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 830-844, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Cheded & Alexandros Skandalis, 2021. "Touch and contact during COVID‐19: Insights from queer digital spaces," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S2), pages 340-347, July.
    2. Grace H. Fan, 2024. "Can You Hear Nature Sing? Enacting the Syilx Ethical Practice of Nʕawqnwixʷ to Reconstruct the Relationships Between Humans and Nature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 249-268, November.
    3. Denise L. Spitzer, 2022. "Working intimacies: Migrant beer sellers, surveillance, and intimate labor in Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 906-921, May.
    4. Milena Bojovic & Andrew McGregor, 2023. "A review of megatrends in the global dairy sector: what are the socioecological implications?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 373-394, March.
    5. Joanne M. Williams & Jillian Bradfield & Andrew Gardiner & Patricia Pendry & Laura Wauthier, 2024. "Co-Producing Paws on Campus: A Psychoeducational Dog-Facilitated Programme for University Students Experiencing Mental Health Difficulties," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Laurence Romani & Patrizia Zanoni & Lotte Holck, 2021. "Radicalizing diversity (research): Time to resume talking about class," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 8-23, January.
    7. Vijayta Doshi, 2021. "Symbolic violence in embodying customer service work across the urban/rural divide," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 39-53, January.
    8. Owain Smolović Jones & Sanela Smolović Jones & Scott Taylor & Emily Yarrow, 2022. "Theorizing gender desegregation as political work: The case of the Welsh Labour Party," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1747-1763, November.
    9. Anna Galazka & Joe O’Mahoney, 2023. "The Socio-Materiality of Dirty Work: A Critical Realist Perspective," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 432-448, April.
    10. Rachel Lara Cohen, 2020. "‘We’re not like that’: Crusader and Maverick Occupational Identity Resistance," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 25(1), pages 136-153, March.
    11. Chris KK Tan & Tingting Liu & Xiaojun Gao, 2021. "Becoming ‘pet slaves’ in urban China: Transspecies urban theory, single professional women and their companion animals," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(16), pages 3371-3387, December.
    12. Wallace, Robert G. & Bergmann, Luke & Kock, Richard & Gilbert, Marius & Hogerwerf, Lenny & Wallace, Rodrick & Holmberg, Mollie, 2015. "The dawn of Structural One Health: A new science tracking disease emergence along circuits of capital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 68-77.
    13. Bianca Stumbitz & Ameeta Jaga, 2020. "A Southern encounter: Maternal body work and low‐income mothers in South Africa," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1485-1500, November.
    14. Delphine Gibassier & Karen Maas & Stefan Schaltegger, 2019. "Special issue of business, strategy, and the environment call for papers business, society, biodiversity, and natural capital deadline June 30, 2020 (see details of conference/workshop at the end of t," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 921-924, July.
    15. Krithika Srinivasan, 2017. "Conservation biopolitics and the sustainability episteme," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(7), pages 1458-1476, July.
    16. Isabella Scheibmayr, 2024. "Organizing vulnerability exploring Judith Butler's conceptualization of vulnerability to study organizations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1385-1408, July.
    17. Martha Rose Geiger, 2024. "Hoof Work: The Feminisation of Donkeys in Ethiopia," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(4), pages 842-860, December.
    18. Kathryn Gillespie, 2021. "The afterlives of the lively commodity: Life-worlds, death-worlds, rotting-worlds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 280-295, March.
    19. Müller, Felix C. & Kleibert, Jana M. & Ibert, Oliver, 2021. "Hiding in the Spotlight: Commodifying Nature and Geographies of Dissociation in the Fur-Fashion Complex," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 97(1), pages 89-112.
    20. Pütz Robert, 2020. "Die Vermarktlichung von Wildnis. Lebendige Waren, Companionability und Encounter Value beim Mustang Makeover Germany," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 64(1), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:4:p:976-997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.