IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v14y2000i1p117-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of the Organising Model in British Trade Unions: Some Evidence from Manufacturing, Science and Finance (MSF)

Author

Listed:
  • Bob Carter

    (Management Centre Department of Economics University of Leicester University Road LEICESTER LE1 7RH)

Abstract

There is increasing evidence of a widespread recognition within the British trade union movement of the need to change. Amongst the directions of change being considered is adoption of the `organising model' borrowed from the United States. MSF was probably the first major British union to go down this path, thereby promising to transform itself from an organisation that had pioneered the conservative `servicing model' to one in the forefront of promoting a radical alternative. This transformation is far from unproblematic and this article examines the tensions and difficulties encountered through a study of NHS membership organisation two regions. In the process of the examination, the article highlights the inadequacies of approaches to union decline that either regard it as an inevitable result of objective circumstances or believe that new policies to counter decline can be adopted by managerial fiat and without recourse to widespread discussion among members to build a consensus.

Suggested Citation

  • Bob Carter, 2000. "Adoption of the Organising Model in British Trade Unions: Some Evidence from Manufacturing, Science and Finance (MSF)," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 14(1), pages 117-136, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:14:y:2000:i:1:p:117-136
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170022118293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170022118293
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170022118293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edmund Heery & Patricia Fosh, 1990. "Introduction: Whose Union? Power and Bureaucracy in the Labour Movement," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Patricia Fosh & Edmund Heery (ed.), Trade Unions and their Members, chapter 1, pages 1-28, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Michael Rose, 1993. "Trade Unions - Ruin, Retreat, or Rally?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 7(2), pages 291-311, June.
    3. Steve Williams, 1997. "The Nature of Some Recent Trade Union Modernization Policies in the UK," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 495-514, December.
    4. Caroline Lloyd, 1997. "Decentralization in the NHS: Prospects for Workplace Unionism," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 427-446, September.
    5. Edmund Heery, 1998. "The Relaunch of the Trades Union Congress," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 339-360, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeremy Waddington & Allan Kerr, 2009. "Transforming a Trade Union? An Assessment of the Introduction of an Organizing Initiative," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(1), pages 27-54, March.
    2. Jeremy Waddington & Allan Kerr, 2015. "Joining UNISON: does the reform of a union organising strategy change how members perceive their recruitment?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 187-207, May.
    3. Christina Cregan & Timothy Bartram & Pauline Stanton, 2009. "Union Organizing as a Mobilizing Strategy: The Impact of Social Identity and Transformational Leadership on the Collectivism of Union Members," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 701-722, December.
    4. Melanie Simms, 2013. "Special Issue. Edited by: Gregor Murray, Christian Lévesque, Christian Dufour and Adelheid Hege," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 373-388, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bob Carter, 2001. "Lessons from America: Changes in the US Trade Union Movement," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 15(1), pages 185-194, March.
    2. Philip James & Joanna Karmowska, 2016. "British union renewal: does salvation really lie beyond the workplace?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 102-116, March.
    3. Bob Carter, 2004. "State Restructuring and Union Renewal: The Case of the National Union of Teachers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 18(1), pages 137-156, March.
    4. Gerry Looker, 2019. "Union organising and Full‐time Officers: acquiescence and resistance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5-6), pages 517-531, November.
    5. Bradon Ellem, 2013. "Peak Union Campaigning: Fighting for Rights at Work in Australia," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 51(2), pages 264-287, June.
    6. Andrea Bellini & Marco Betti & Alberto Gherardini & Francesco Lauria, 2023. "Collectivising services: a path to trade union renewal in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(4), pages 457-473, November.
    7. Robert Perrett & Miguel Martínez Lucio & Jo McBride & Steve Craig, 2012. "Trade Union Learning Strategies and Migrant Workers," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(3), pages 649-667, February.
    8. Cécile Guillaume & Gill Kirton, 2023. "‘Walking a fine line’: Union perspectives on partnership in nursing and midwifery workplaces," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(3), pages 893-909, August.
    9. Miguel Martínez Lucio & Robert Perrett, 2009. "Meanings and dilemmas in community unionism," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(4), pages 693-710, December.
    10. Jonathan Preminger, 2013. "Activists face bureaucrats: the failure of the Israeli social workers' campaign," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5-6), pages 462-478, November.
    11. Gregor Murray, 2017. "Union renewal: what can we learn from three decades of research?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(1), pages 9-29, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:14:y:2000:i:1:p:117-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.