IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v28y2024i3p313-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stock Market Integration and Trade: A Study on India and its Major Trading Partners

Author

Listed:
  • Samiran Jana

Abstract

Indian stock market is increasingly integrated with other markets of the world after economic liberalization. This linkage of Indian stock market reduces the scope of risk minimization of portfolio by diversifying between stock markets of India and its integrated partners. Researchers indicate that economic variables influence the integration of stock markets. Trade is one of the major parameters. In this study effort has been made to find how Indian stock market integration varies with amount of trade with its trading partners. Hence 21 years’ weekly data from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2019 have been collected for 15 countries, which belong to the list of top 25 trading partners of India since 1999. Total sample of 15 countries have been divided into two groups—Asia Pacific and European group along with United States, to check whether integration increase with trade. Johansen Cointegration test has been used between stock markets of India and two groups of countries. To confirm the result of Johansen cointegration test, the same test was ran on joint index for each group and Sensex of India. It also helped to check the effect of geographical proximity on this integration. Conditional correlation was found using asymmetric generalized dynamic conditional correlation (AGDCC) GARCH model, between Sensex and each of the 15 countries, to observe the time varying nature of correlation. Twenty one year’s data has helped to find the impact of global financial crisis (GFC) of 2008 on these interlinkages. Lending rate differential and inflation rate differential can cover many economic parameters, hence used as control variable. Time series regression has been used to find the impact of trade, interest rate and inflation differential on correlation between Indian stock market index and index of any other countries. Pooled panel regression has been used to check the same relationship on all countries in every group. Nine Asian countries together contribute higher amount of trade with India since 2004 than jointly five European countries and the United States. Trade difference is very low, hence this study analysed both the groups. Asia Pacific group of countries is more integrated with India than European group and the United States. None of the joint index is integrated with Indian stock market index. Conditional correlation between Indian index and each of the country has changed over time. Time series regression implies that except very few cases, trade and other economic factors cannot influence the integration. As expected, the interest rate differential and inflation differential have negative and positive impacts on the correlation respectively but these impacts are not significant in many cases. Pooled panel regression shows that trade and GFC have positive and significant impact on correlation between India and Asia Pacific countries but not with the same between India and European countries and United States. International investors will not be able to reduce their portfolio risk by diversifying between India and any other of the 15 countries in the sample because all of them are integrated with Indian stock market. Trade of India with Asian countries has increased in recent years and integration has also increased. Although time series and pooled panel regression do not prove it’s significant impact on conditional correlation between India and the sampled countries. But trade between two countries definitely bear a role in integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Samiran Jana, 2024. "Stock Market Integration and Trade: A Study on India and its Major Trading Partners," Vision, , vol. 28(3), pages 313-326, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:28:y:2024:i:3:p:313-326
    DOI: 10.1177/09722629211034406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09722629211034406
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09722629211034406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Obstfeld, Maurice, 1994. "Risk-Taking, Global Diversification, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(5), pages 1310-1329, December.
    2. Mierau, Jochen O. & Mink, Mark, 2013. "Are stock market crises contagious? The role of crisis definitions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 4765-4776.
    3. Lorenzo Cappiello & Robert F. Engle & Kevin Sheppard, 2006. "Asymmetric Dynamics in the Correlations of Global Equity and Bond Returns," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 537-572.
    4. Masih, Abul M. M. & Masih, Rumi, 1999. "Are Asian stock market fluctuations due mainly to intra-regional contagion effects? Evidence based on Asian emerging stock markets," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 7(3-4), pages 251-282, August.
    5. Paramita Mukherjee & Suchismita Bose, 2008. "Does the Stock Market in India Move with Asia?: A Multivariate Cointegration-Vector Autoregression Approach," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 5-22, September.
    6. Johansen, Soren, 1991. "Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(6), pages 1551-1580, November.
    7. Paramati & Rakesh Gupta & Eduardo Roca, 2015. "Stock market interdependence between Australia and its trading partners: does trade intensity matter?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(49), pages 5303-5319, October.
    8. Chen, Gong-meng & Firth, Michael & Meng Rui, Oliver, 2002. "Stock market linkages: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1113-1141, June.
    9. MacKinnon, James G, 1996. "Numerical Distribution Functions for Unit Root and Cointegration Tests," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(6), pages 601-618, Nov.-Dec..
    10. Song, Yuegang & Huang, Ruixian & Paramati, Sudharshan Reddy & Zakari, Abdulrasheed, 2021. "Does economic integration lead to financial market integration in the Asian region?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 366-377.
    11. MacKinnon, James G & Haug, Alfred A & Michelis, Leo, 1999. "Numerical Distribution Functions of Likelihood Ratio Tests for Cointegration," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(5), pages 563-577, Sept.-Oct.
    12. Robert Johnson & Luc Soenen, 2002. "Asian Economic Integration and Stock Market Comovement," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 25(1), pages 141-157, March.
    13. Johansen, Soren, 1995. "Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198774501.
    14. Cho-Min Lin & Wan-Hsiu Cheng, 2008. "Economic determinants of comovement across international stock markets: the example of Taiwan and its key trading partners," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9), pages 1187-1205.
    15. Sudharshan Reddy Paramati & Eduardo Roca & Rakesh Gupta, 2016. "Economic integration and stock market dynamic linkages: evidence in the context of Australia and Asia," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(44), pages 4210-4226, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Yuegang & Huang, Ruixian & Paramati, Sudharshan Reddy & Zakari, Abdulrasheed, 2021. "Does economic integration lead to financial market integration in the Asian region?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 366-377.
    2. Gupta, Rakesh & Guidi, Francesco, 2012. "Cointegration relationship and time varying co-movements among Indian and Asian developed stock markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 10-22.
    3. Ansgar Belke & Robert Czudaj, 2010. "Is Euro Area Money Demand (Still) Stable? Cointegrated VAR Versus Single Equation Techniques," Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik), Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 56(4), pages 285-315.
    4. Abo-Zaid Salem M, 2011. "The Trade-Growth Relationship in Israel Revisited: Evidence from Annual Data, 1960-2004," Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, De Gruyter, vol. 6(3), pages 63-93, February.
    5. Rodrigo da Silva Souza & Leonardo B. de Mattos & João E. de Lima, 2021. "Commodity prices and the Brazilian real exchange rate," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 3152-3172, April.
    6. Chien, Mei-Se & Lee, Chien-Chiang & Hu, Te-Chung & Hu, Hui-Ting, 2015. "Dynamic Asian stock market convergence: Evidence from dynamic cointegration analysis among China and ASEAN-5," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 84-98.
    7. Marta Gómez-Puig & Simón Sosvilla-Rivero, 2014. "EMU sovereign debt market crisis: Fundamentals-based or pure contagion?," Working Papers 14-08, Asociación Española de Economía y Finanzas Internacionales.
    8. Andreas Buhn & Alexander Karmann & Friedrich Schneider, 2007. "Size and Development of the Shadow Economy and of Do-it-Yourself Activities: The Case of Germany," CREMA Working Paper Series 2007-14, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    9. Ali Shehadeh & Peter Erdos & Youwei Li & Michael Moore, 2016. "US Dollar Carry Trades in the Era of "Cheap Money"," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 66(5), pages 374-404, October.
    10. Sudharshan Reddy Paramati & Rakesh Gupta & Kishore Tandon, 2016. "Dynamic analysis of time-varying correlations and cointegration relationship between Australia and frontier equity markets," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 121-145.
    11. Shehu Usman Rano Aliyu, 2010. "Exchange rate volatility and export trade in Nigeria: an empirical investigation," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(13), pages 1071-1084.
    12. Miguel Carvalho & Paulo Júlio, 2012. "Digging out the PPP hypothesis: an integrated empirical coverage," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 713-744, June.
    13. Muhammad Afzal, 2012. "Ricardian equivalence hypothesis: Evidence from Pakistan," E3 Journal of Business Management and Economics., E3 Journals, vol. 3(6), pages 258-265.
    14. Sowmya Dhanaraj & Arun Kumar Gopalaswamy & Suresh Babu M, 2013. "Dynamic interdependence between US and Asian markets: an empirical study," Journal of Financial Economic Policy, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 220-237, April.
    15. Black, Angela J. & Fraser, Patricia & McMillan, David G., 2007. "Are international value premiums driven by the same set of fundamentals?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 113-129.
    16. Gómez-Puig, Marta & Sosvilla-Rivero, Simón, 2014. "Causality and contagion in EMU sovereign debt markets," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-27.
    17. Mohammad Mahabub Alam, 2018. "The Determinants of CPI Inflation in Bangladesh, 1980-2016," Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(4), pages 441-461, December.
    18. Freitas, Carlos J. Pereira & Silva, Patrícia Pereira da, 2015. "European Union emissions trading scheme impact on the Spanish electricity price during phase II and phase III implementation," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 54-62.
    19. Katsuya Ito, 2012. "The Impact of Oil Price Shocks on the Iranian Economy: New evidence," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(3), pages 2246-2254.
    20. Vaona, Andrea, 2012. "Granger non-causality tests between (non)renewable energy consumption and output in Italy since 1861: The (ir)relevance of structural breaks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 226-236.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:28:y:2024:i:3:p:313-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.