IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v21y2017i3p305-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Feedback Effects of Brand Extension on Parent Brand Equity: A Study on Indian FMCG Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Richa Joshi
  • Rajan Yadav

Abstract

Brand extension is an important strategy to utilize the credibility of the brand and to minimize the advertising costs. The strategy is used in various industries these days but fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) is such an industry which lie closer to a consumer, hence the immediate effect of any strategy can be properly viewed in this industry. The study is an attempt to provide a framework to examine the effects of brand extension strategy on parent brand equity. It is based on two real FMCG brands of Indian market and their brand extensions. Two frameworks are shown based on the two brands Saffola and Fortune with a sample size of 285 and 278 respondents, respectively. Structural equation modelling is used to analyze the effectiveness of both the frameworks. The findings indicate that brand extensions do affect parent brand equity. Therefore, extensions should be introduced in such a manner that they help to strengthen parent brand equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Richa Joshi & Rajan Yadav, 2017. "Evaluating the Feedback Effects of Brand Extension on Parent Brand Equity: A Study on Indian FMCG Industry," Vision, , vol. 21(3), pages 305-313, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:21:y:2017:i:3:p:305-313
    DOI: 10.1177/0972262917716763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972262917716763
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972262917716763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harleen Kaur & Ajay Pandit, 2015. "Modelling Consumer Evaluation of Brand Extensions: Empirical Evidence from India," Vision, , vol. 19(1), pages 37-48, March.
    2. Hem, Leif Egil & Iversen, Nina Marianne & Olsen, Lars Erling, 2014. "Category characteristics' effects on brand extension attitudes: A research note," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1589-1594.
    3. Park, C Whan & Milberg, Sandra & Lawson, Robert, 1991. "Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 185-193, September.
    4. Dowling, Grahame R & Staelin, Richard, 1994. "A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 119-134, June.
    5. Ahluwalia, Rohini & Gurhan-Canli, Zeynep, 2000. "The Effects of Extensions of the Family Brand Name: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(3), pages 371-381, December.
    6. Yoo, Boonghee & Donthu, Naveen, 2001. "Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Gatignon, Hubert & Robertson, Thomas S, 1985. "A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(4), pages 849-867, March.
    8. Martínez, Eva & Montaner, Teresa & Pina, José M., 2009. "Brand extension feedback: The role of advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 305-313, March.
    9. Sarwat Afzal, 2013. "Factors Influencing Successful Brand Extension into Related and Unrelated Product Categories," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(2), pages 216-226.
    10. Dens, Nathalie & De Pelsmacker, Patrick, 2010. "Attitudes toward the extension and parent brand in response to extension advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1237-1244, November.
    11. Franziska Völckner & Henrik Sattler & Gwen Kaufmann, 2008. "Image feedback effects of brand extensions: Evidence from a longitudinal field study," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 109-124, June.
    12. Sarwat Afzal, 2013. "Factors Influencing Successful Brand Extension into Related and Unrelated Product Categories," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(2), pages 216-226, February.
    13. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1980. "Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(3), pages 283-295, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hwa-Kyung Kim & Timothy J. Lee, 2018. "Brand Equity of a Tourist Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Durdana Ozretic-Dosen & Marta Brlic & Tanja Komarac, 2018. "Strategic Brand Management In Emerging Markets: Consumer Perceptions Of Brand Extensions," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richa Joshi & Rajan Yadav, 2018. "An Integrated SEM Neural Network Approach to Study Effectiveness of Brand Extension in Indian FMCG Industry," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 6(2), pages 113-128, July.
    2. Harleen Kaur & Ajay Pandit, 2015. "Modelling Consumer Evaluation of Brand Extensions: Empirical Evidence from India," Vision, , vol. 19(1), pages 37-48, March.
    3. Chung-Yu Wang & Li-Wei Wu & Chen-Yu Lin & Ruei-Jie Chen, 2017. "Purchase Intention toward the Extension and Parent Brand: The Role of Brand Commitment," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 83-103, February.
    4. Vibhuti Tripathi & Pooja Rastogi & Suresh Kumar, 2018. "Direct and Moderating Influence of Perceived Fit, Risk and Parent Brand Trust on Brand Extension Success of a Personal Care Brand in India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(6), pages 1681-1692, December.
    5. Richa Joshi & Rajan Yadav, 2018. "Exploring the Mediating Effect of Parent Brand Reputation on Brand Equity," Paradigm, , vol. 22(2), pages 125-142, December.
    6. Michel, Géraldine & Donthu, Naveen, 2014. "Why negative brand extension evaluations do not always negatively affect the brand: The role of central and peripheral brand associations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2611-2619.
    7. Falana, Wuraola Oluwabukola & Aspara, Jaakko & Frösén, Johanna, 2024. "The impact of Janus fit brand extensions on perceived brand innovativeness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Ingrid Moons & Patrick De Pelsmacker, 2015. "Self-Brand Personality Differences and Attitudes towards Electric Cars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Dens, Nathalie & De Pelsmacker, Patrick, 2010. "Attitudes toward the extension and parent brand in response to extension advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1237-1244, November.
    10. Pina, José M. & Dall'Olmo Riley, Francesca & Lomax, Wendy, 2013. "Generalizing spillover effects of goods and service brand extensions: A meta-analysis approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1411-1419.
    11. Santos, Glauber Eduardo de Oliveira & Giraldi, Janaina de Moura Engracia, 2017. "Reciprocal effect of tourist destinations on the strength of national tourism brands," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 443-450.
    12. Huang, Xiaozhi & Wu, Xitong & Cao, Xin & Wu, Jifei, 2023. "The effect of medical artificial intelligence innovation locus on consumer adoption of new products," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    13. Anita Gärling & John Thøgersen, 2001. "Marketing of electric vehicles," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 53-65, January.
    14. Lang, Le Dang & Lim, Weng Marc & Guzmán, Francisco, 2022. "How does promotion mix affect brand equity? Insights from a mixed-methods study of low involvement products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 175-190.
    15. Das, Gopal, 2014. "Factors affecting Indian shoppers׳ attitude and purchase intention: An empirical check," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 561-569.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2386 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Özge Sýðýrcý & A. Müge Yalçýn, 2010. "Factors Affecting Consumer Evaluations Of Brand Extensions," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 24(1+2), pages 67-90.
    18. Johan Jansson, 2011. "Consumer eco‐innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 192-210, March.
    19. E. Bacchiega & M. Colucci & M. Magnani, 2019. "What goes around, comes around: Reciprocal effects and double-sided moral hazard in the choice of brand licensing," Working Papers wp1136, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    20. Lee, Kyootai & Khan, Shaji & Mirchandani, Dinesh, 2013. "Hierarchical effects of product attributes on actualized innovativeness in the context of high-tech products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2634-2641.
    21. Ching-Hsun Chang & Yu-Shan Chen, 2014. "Managing green brand equity: the perspective of perceived risk theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1753-1768, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:21:y:2017:i:3:p:305-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.