IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v19y2018i6p1681-1692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct and Moderating Influence of Perceived Fit, Risk and Parent Brand Trust on Brand Extension Success of a Personal Care Brand in India

Author

Listed:
  • Vibhuti Tripathi
  • Pooja Rastogi
  • Suresh Kumar

Abstract

The shifting market dynamics and harsh rivalry of the worldwide economy have augmented the role of brands to an incomparable level. Brand extension has emerged as a popular strategy in the marketing area. While it brings brands closer to success, it is also imperative and important to understand how consumers evaluate and presume similar or dissimilar extensions and what is the substantial influence of risk and subsistence of parent brand on extension success? Identifying and analysing such relationships could be helpful and important for personal care brands in India to gain an edge over competitors. Data were collected from 500 consumers who were proverbial with the brand extensions of Dettol in similar or dissimilar product categories. Regression analysis showed that though perceived fit and risk directly influence the success of brand extension, nevertheless on incorporating parent brand conviction as a moderator the relationships between perceived fit and brand extension success and risk and brand extension success are strengthened. Limitations and future scope have also been mentioned.

Suggested Citation

  • Vibhuti Tripathi & Pooja Rastogi & Suresh Kumar, 2018. "Direct and Moderating Influence of Perceived Fit, Risk and Parent Brand Trust on Brand Extension Success of a Personal Care Brand in India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(6), pages 1681-1692, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:19:y:2018:i:6:p:1681-1692
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150918794978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150918794978
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150918794978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarwat Afzal, 2013. "Factors Influencing Successful Brand Extension into Related and Unrelated Product Categories," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(2), pages 216-226.
    2. Dowling, Grahame R & Staelin, Richard, 1994. "A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 119-134, June.
    3. Claudiu-Catalin Munteanu, 2015. "Competitive differentiation through brand extensions in the era of hyper competition," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 18(55), pages 57-70, March.
    4. Del Canto, Jesus Galende & Gonzalez, Isabel Suarez, 1999. "A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm's R&D activities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 891-905, November.
    5. Sarwat Afzal, 2013. "Factors Influencing Successful Brand Extension into Related and Unrelated Product Categories," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(2), pages 216-226, February.
    6. Ahluwalia, Rohini & Gurhan-Canli, Zeynep, 2000. "The Effects of Extensions of the Family Brand Name: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(3), pages 371-381, December.
    7. M. Prasanna Mohan Raj & Satam Roy, 2015. "Impact of Brand Image on Consumer Decision-making: A Study on High-technology Products," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(3), pages 463-477, June.
    8. Sandra J. Milberg & Francisca Sinn & Ronald C. Goodstein, 2010. "Consumer Reactions to Brand Extensions in a Competitive Context: Does Fit Still Matter?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(3), pages 543-553, October.
    9. Sheinin, Daniel A. & Schmitt, Bernd H., 1994. "Extending brands with new product concepts: The role of category attribute congruity, brand affect, and brand breadth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-10, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richa Joshi & Rajan Yadav, 2017. "Evaluating the Feedback Effects of Brand Extension on Parent Brand Equity: A Study on Indian FMCG Industry," Vision, , vol. 21(3), pages 305-313, September.
    2. Kevin Lane Keller, 2016. "Reflections on customer-based brand equity: perspectives, progress, and priorities," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Kronrod, Ann & Lowrey, Tina M., 2016. "Tastlé-Nestlé, Toogle-Google: The effects of similarity to familiar brand names in brand name innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1182-1189.
    4. Martínez Salinas, Eva & Pina Pérez, José Miguel, 2009. "Modeling the brand extensions' influence on brand image," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 50-60, January.
    5. Kevin Lane Keller & Donald R. Lehmann, 2006. "Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 740-759, 11-12.
    6. Chung-Yu Wang & Li-Wei Wu & Chen-Yu Lin & Ruei-Jie Chen, 2017. "Purchase Intention toward the Extension and Parent Brand: The Role of Brand Commitment," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 83-103, February.
    7. Richa Joshi & Rajan Yadav, 2018. "Exploring the Mediating Effect of Parent Brand Reputation on Brand Equity," Paradigm, , vol. 22(2), pages 125-142, December.
    8. Kang, Min Jung & Park, Heejun, 2011. "Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3465-3475, June.
    9. Chen, Zengxiang & Huang, Yunhui, 2016. "Cause-related marketing is not always less favorable than corporate philanthropy: The moderating role of self-construal," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 868-880.
    10. H. T. Tran & E. Santarelli, 2013. "Determinants and Effects of Innovative Activities in Vietnam. A Firm-level Analysis," Working Papers wp909, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    11. Yadav, Manjit S. & de Valck, Kristine & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Hoffman, Donna L. & Spann, Martin, 2013. "Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 311-323.
    12. Dutta, Sujay & Pullig, Chris, 2011. "Effectiveness of corporate responses to brand crises: The role of crisis type and response strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 1281-1287.
    13. Jesús J. Cambra‐Fierro & J. Alfredo Flores‐Hernández & Lourdes Pérez & Guadalupe Valera‐Blanes, 2020. "CSR and branding in emerging economies: The effect of incomes and education," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2765-2776, November.
    14. Montserrat Manzaneque & Alfonso A. Rojo-Ramírez & Julio Diéguez-Soto & Maria J. Martínez-Romero, 2020. "How negative aspiration performance gaps affect innovation efficiency," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 209-233, January.
    15. Dubey, Subodh & Sharma, Ishant & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Cats, Oded & Bansal, Prateek, 2022. "A General Framework to Forecast the Adoption of Novel Products: A Case of Autonomous Vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 63-95.
    16. Niklas Bondesson, 2012. "Brand Image Antecedents of Loyalty and Price Premium in Business Markets," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 32-47, March.
    17. Saridakis, George & Benson, Vladlena & Ezingeard, Jean-Noel & Tennakoon, Hemamali, 2016. "Individual information security, user behaviour and cyber victimisation: An empirical study of social networking users," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 320-330.
    18. Catherine Viot & André Le Roux & Florence Kremer, 2014. "Attitude towards the purchase of counterfeits: Antecedents and effect on intention to purchase," Post-Print halshs-02530136, HAL.
    19. Singh, Sonika & Ratchford, Brian T. & Prasad, Ashutosh, 2014. "Offline and Online Search in Used Durables Markets," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 301-320.
    20. Parlakorn Kornpitack & Puris Sornsaruht, 2019. "Intention to Purchase Travel Online: A SEM Analysis," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 246-260.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:19:y:2018:i:6:p:1681-1692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.