IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v56y2019i4p689-704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The performance of transparency in public–private infrastructure project governance: The politics of documentary practices

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Valverde

    (University of Toronto, Canada)

  • Aaron Moore

    (University of Winnipeg, Canada)

Abstract

That public–private infrastructure partnerships (P3s) present problems in relation to democratic accountability has often been noted, with calls for greater transparency often following. Such calls tend to assume that anything that promotes transparency will further accountability and openness. Drawing on socio-legal studies of the documentary and other information practices that underpin and operationalise governance, this article carefully examines the features and the possible uses of the documentation that is made public by the PPP sector, in Canada. We find that information practices that perform and produce transparency (such as posting project documents online) may produce a merely illusory accountability. Particular attention is paid to the scale at which infrastructure planning information is made public, the selection of content included in the documents (e.g. photos of buildings versus background information), and the information formats commonly utilised. Overall, we find that the information that is made public does not actually empower the concerned public: projects are presented out of context, devoid of historical or comparative context and without reference to any broader regional or other plan, and when ‘real’ documents are made public, neither the content nor their framing enables effective openness, thus hindering accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Valverde & Aaron Moore, 2019. "The performance of transparency in public–private infrastructure project governance: The politics of documentary practices," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(4), pages 689-704, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:56:y:2019:i:4:p:689-704
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098017741404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017741404
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098017741404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raphael Zumofen, 2016. "Public accountability: a summary analysis [Accountability publique - Une analyse synthétique]," Post-Print hal-03623869, HAL.
    2. Raphael Zumofen, 2016. "Public accountability: a summary analysis [Accountability publique - Une analyse synthétique]," Post-Print hal-03623871, HAL.
    3. Matti Siemiatycki & Naeem Farooqi, 2012. "Value for Money and Risk in Public–Private Partnerships," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(3), pages 286-299.
    4. Graeme A. Hodge & Carsten Greve & Anthony E. Boardman (ed.), 2010. "International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13451.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Opara, 2018. "Value for Money and Risk Relationships in Public–Private Partnerships: Evaluating Program‐based Evidence," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(3), pages 391-404, September.
    2. Avner Offer, 2018. "Patient and impatient capital: time horizons as market boundaries," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _165, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    3. Weixia Lyu & Yanan Zheng & Camila Fonseca & Jerry Zhirong Zhao, 2020. "Public-Private Partnership Transformation and Worker Satisfaction: A Case Study of Sanitation Workers in H-City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Philip Ashton & Marc Doussard & Rachel Weber, 2016. "Reconstituting the state: City powers and exposures in Chicago’s infrastructure leases," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(7), pages 1384-1400, May.
    5. Cian O'SHEA & Dónal PALCIC & Eoin REEVES, 2019. "Comparing Ppp With Traditional Procurement: The Case Of Schools Procurement In Ireland," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 245-267, June.
    6. Buso, Marco & Marty, Frederic & Tran, Phuong Tra, 2017. "Public-private partnerships from budget constraints: Looking for debt hiding?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 56-84.
    7. Mariateresa Torchia & Andrea Calabrò, 2018. "Increasing the Governance Standards of Public-Private Partnerships in Healthcare. Evidence from Italy," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 93-110, March.
    8. Chiapa Aguillón, Everardo, 2020. "Challenges in local governance: Public-private partnerships as an instrument for local transport policies," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Khadaroo, Iqbal, 2014. "The valuation of risk transfer in UK school public private partnership contracts," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 154-165.
    10. Rosella Carè & Riccardo De Lisa, 2019. "Social Impact Bonds for a Sustainable Welfare State: The Role of Enabling Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Sidra Irfan, 2021. "Re‐examining the link between collaborative interorganisational relationships and synergistic outcomes in public–private partnerships: Insights from the Punjab Education Foundation's school partnershi," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2), pages 79-90, May.
    12. Mark A. Moore & Aidan R. Vining, 2023. "PPP performance evaluation: the social welfare goal, principal–agent theory and political economy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 267-299, June.
    13. Ir. Michiel Kort & Stefan Verweij & Erik-Hans Klijn, 2016. "In search for effective public-private partnerships: An assessment of the impact of organizational form and managerial strategies in urban regeneration partnerships using fsQCA," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(5), pages 777-794, August.
    14. Fang, F., 2019. "When performance shortfall arises, contract or trust? A multi-method study of the impact of contractual and relational governances on performance in public – private partnerships," Other publications TiSEM 473840ee-6945-4a93-9326-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Wikus Kruger & Anton Eberhard, 2018. "Renewable energy auctions in sub‐Saharan Africa: Comparing the South African, Ugandan, and Zambian Programs," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), July.
    16. Ilyas, Muh. Indra Fauzi, 2023. "Analysis Of Local Government Financial Performance Based On The Method Value For Money," MPRA Paper 119027, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Oct 2023.
    17. Anthony E. Boardman & Mark Moore & Aidan Vining, 2020. "Financing and Funding Approaches for Establishment, Governance and Regulatory Oversight of the Canadian Northern Corridor," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 13(25), October.
    18. Carsten Greve, 2015. "Ideas in Public Management Reform for the 2010s. Digitalization, Value Creation and Involvement," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 49-65, March.
    19. Annalisa Caloffi & Stephen Pryke & Silvia R Sedita & Matti Siemiatycki, 2017. "Public–private partnerships and beyond: Potential for innovation and sustainable development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 739-745, August.
    20. Richard Evans, 2015. "Harnessing the Economic Potential of ‘Second-Tier’ European Cities: Lessons from Four Different State/Urban Systems," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(1), pages 163-183, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:56:y:2019:i:4:p:689-704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.