IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v15y2015i1p49-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ideas in Public Management Reform for the 2010s. Digitalization, Value Creation and Involvement

Author

Listed:
  • Carsten Greve

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the three key ideas for an agenda for the public sector that are emerging as dominant ideas in the 2010’s in the literature on public organizations. The paper examines a select number of self-styled conceptual alternatives from the literature on public management to what has been the dominant paradigm in recent years, the New Public Management (NPM). “Self-styled” means that they explicitly present themselves as alternatives to NPM and address the shortcomings in NPM to promote alternative conceptualizations. They include Digital-Era Governance, Public Value Management (PVM), Collaborative Governance, also known to some as the New Public Governance (NPG). The paper takes each of these as broad categories, and proposes that each shelters sub-categories of ideas. DEG: transparency, social media and shared service centers. PVM: strategy-making, performance governance, and innovation and strategic HRM. NPG: networks and collaboration, public-private partnerships and new ways of engaging active citizens. The paper sees these ideas as competing for dominance in the public organization literature as they are new drivers for reforms. Together they form the building blocks of how public management reforms can be build. The paper also recognizes that there are disagreements between them. The paper suggests that these tensions must be addressed if the reform movement is going to be coherent. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Carsten Greve, 2015. "Ideas in Public Management Reform for the 2010s. Digitalization, Value Creation and Involvement," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 49-65, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:15:y:2015:i:1:p:49-65
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-013-0253-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11115-013-0253-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-013-0253-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Farazmand, 2012. "Sound Governance: Engaging Citizens through Collaborative Organizations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 223-241, September.
    2. B. Peters & Jon Pierre & Tiina Randma-Liiv, 2011. "Global Financial Crisis, Public Administration and Governance: Do New Problems Require New Solutions?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 13-27, March.
    3. Graeme A. Hodge & Carsten Greve & Anthony E. Boardman (ed.), 2010. "International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13451.
    4. Dag Christensen & Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid & Tor Midtbø, 2012. "Cross-Border Coordination Activities in Central Government Administration—Combining Organizational Conditions and Individual Features," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 367-382, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paolo Esposito & Spiridione Lucio Dicorato, 2020. "Sustainable Development, Governance and Performance Measurement in Public Private Partnerships (PPPs): A Methodological Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-25, July.
    2. John Alford & Carsten Greve, 2017. "Strategy in the Public and Private Sectors: Similarities, Differences and Changes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Marika Tammeaid & Petri Virtanen & Jens Meyer, 2022. "Leadership meta-skills in public institutions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(7), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Jari Stenvall & Petri Virtanen, 2017. "Intelligent Public Organisations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 195-209, June.
    6. Michal Pohludka & Hana Stverkova & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2018. "Implementation and Unification of the ERP System in a Global Company as a Strategic Decision for Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Boeing, Philipp & Wang, Yihan, 2021. "Decoding China's Covid-19 "virus exceptionalism": Community-based digital contact tracing in Wuhan," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-028, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Virtanen Petri & Vakkuri Jarmo, 2015. "Searching for Organizational Intelligence in the Evolution of Public-Sector Performance Management," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 89-99, December.
    9. Aidan R. Vining, 2016. "What Is Public Agency Strategic Analysis (PASA) and How Does It Differ from Public Policy Analysis and Firm Strategy Analysis?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-31, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro Rodriguez, 2019. "Defining Governance in Latin America," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 5-19, March.
    2. Hassan Danaeefard & Ali Farazmand & Akram Dastyari, 2023. "The Iranian Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-9) Crisismanship: Understanding the Contributions of National Culture, Media, Technology and Economic System," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1661-1682, December.
    3. Francisco Pinheiro Catalão & Carlos Oliveira Cruz & Joaquim Miranda Sarmento, 2023. "Public Sector Corruption and Accountability in Cost Deviations and Overruns of Public Projects," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1105-1126, September.
    4. Claudio Balestri, 2014. "Political Organizations, Interest Groups and Citizens Engagement: An Integrated Model of Democracy," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 533-543, December.
    5. Ian Thynne, 2011. "Symposium Introduction: The Global Financial Crisis, Governance and Institutional Dynamics," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Anthony E. Boardman & Matti Siemiatycki & Aidan R. Vining, 2016. "The Theory and Evidence Concerning Public-Private Partnerships in Canada and Elsewhere," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 9(12), March.
    7. Charis Vlados & Nikolaos Deniozos & Demosthenes Chatzinikolaou, 2018. "Global Crisis, Innovation and Change Management: Towards a New Systemic Perception of the Current Globalization Restructuring," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 9-29, August.
    8. Charis Vlados & Nikolaos Deniozos & Demosthenes Chatzinikolaou & Michail Demertzis, 2018. "Perceiving Competitiveness under the Restructuring Process of Globalization," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(8), pages 135-135, June.
    9. Buso, Marco & Marty, Frederic & Tran, Phuong Tra, 2017. "Public-private partnerships from budget constraints: Looking for debt hiding?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 56-84.
    10. Sheilendra Peerthum & Takesh Luckho, 2021. "Exploring the Linkage Between Public Corruption and Political Trust in Mauritius: a PLS-SEM Approach," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 317-335, June.
    11. Petar Sorić & Ivana Lolić & Marija Logarušić, 2022. "Economic Sentiment and Aggregate Activity: A Tale of Two European Cycles," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 445-462, March.
    12. Mariateresa Torchia & Andrea Calabrò, 2018. "Increasing the Governance Standards of Public-Private Partnerships in Healthcare. Evidence from Italy," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 93-110, March.
    13. Michael Opara, 2018. "Value for Money and Risk Relationships in Public–Private Partnerships: Evaluating Program‐based Evidence," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(3), pages 391-404, September.
    14. Ali Marvi & Seyyed Mojtaba Shahraini & Najmoddin Yazdi & Ali Maleki, 2021. "Iran and COVID-19: A Bottom-up, Faith-Driven, Citizen-Supported Response," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 723-740, December.
    15. Mariana Valverde & Aaron Moore, 2019. "The performance of transparency in public–private infrastructure project governance: The politics of documentary practices," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(4), pages 689-704, March.
    16. Khadaroo, Iqbal, 2014. "The valuation of risk transfer in UK school public private partnership contracts," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 154-165.
    17. Linda Colley & Shelley Woods & Brian Head, 2022. "Pandemic effects on public service employment in Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(1), pages 56-79, March.
    18. Halil Dincer Kaya, 2017. "The Regional Impacts Of The 2008-2009 Global Crisis On Governance," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 80-90, April.
    19. Ali Farazmand, 2013. "Governance in the Age of Globalization: Challenges and Opportunities for South and Southeast Asia," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 349-363, December.
    20. Petar Sorić, 2018. "Consumer confidence as a GDP determinant in New EU Member States: a view from a time-varying perspective," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 45(2), pages 261-282, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:15:y:2015:i:1:p:49-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.