IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v46y2009i8p1702-1722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rise of Gated Communities in Israel: Reflections on Changing Urban Governance in a Neo-liberal Era

Author

Listed:
  • Gillad Rosen

    (Department of Geography, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91905, Israel, gillad.rosen@mail.huji.ac.il)

  • Eran Razin

    (Department of Geography, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91905, Israel, msrazin@mscc.huji.ac.il)

Abstract

This study examines the contemporary development of gated communities in Israel, linking the phenomenon to global trends in privatisation, associated with the rise of neo-liberal landscapes. It is argued that assertions on weakening state intervention and strengthening influence of the market, oversimplify the complex interplay of private developers, public planning institutions and third-sector organisations. Neo-liberal urban governance does not imply the demise of regulation, but rather its changing nature. Although public awareness of gated communities was late to develop in Israel, in part because earlier forms of gating blurred its development, evidence reveals that social and environmental third-sector organisations are important new stakeholders involved in the production of gated spaces through their impact on public policy, balancing the `disciplining' impact of market organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillad Rosen & Eran Razin, 2009. "The Rise of Gated Communities in Israel: Reflections on Changing Urban Governance in a Neo-liberal Era," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(8), pages 1702-1722, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:46:y:2009:i:8:p:1702-1722
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098009105508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098009105508
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098009105508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evan McKenzie, 2003. "Common‐interest housing in the communities of tomorrow," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1-2), pages 203-234.
    2. Bob Jessop & Ngai-Ling Sum, 2000. "An Entrepreneurial City in Action: Hong Kong's Emerging Strategies in and for (Inter)Urban Competition," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(12), pages 2287-2313, November.
    3. Gillad Rosen & Eran Razin, 2007. "The College Chase: Higher Education And Urban Entrepreneurialism In Israel," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 98(1), pages 86-101, February.
    4. Olivier Borraz & Peter John, 2004. "The Transformation of Urban Political Leadership in Western Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 107-120, March.
    5. Keith Dowding, 2001. "Explaining Urban Regimes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 7-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adrienne La Grange, 2014. "Hong Kong's Gating Machine," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 251-269, March.
    2. Gabriel Fauveaud, 2016. "Residential Enclosure, Power and Relationality: Rethinking Sociopolitical Relations in Southeast Asian Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 849-865, July.
    3. Peter Aning Tedong & Jill L. Grant & Wan Nor Azriyati Wan Abd Aziz, 2015. "Governing Enclosure: The Role of Governance in Producing Gated Communities and Guarded Neighborhoods in Malaysia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 112-128, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clemente J. Navarro Yáñez & Annick Magnier & M. Antonia Ramírez, 2008. "Local Governance as Government–Business Cooperation in Western Democracies: Analysing Local and Intergovernmental Effects by Multi‐Level Comparison," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 531-547, September.
    2. David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), 2014. "Cities and Private Planning," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15788.
    3. Nurit Alfasi & Talia Margalit, 2014. "The challenge of regulating private planning initiatives," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 13, pages 269-294, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Ioannis Chorianopoulos & Theodoros Iosifides, 2006. "The Neoliberal Framework of EU Urban Policy in Action: Supporting Competitiveness and Reaping Disparities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(4), pages 409-422, November.
    5. Andrew M. Wood, 2004. "Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 2103-2118, October.
    6. Walter J. Nicholls, 2005. "Power and Governance: Metropolitan Governance in France," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(4), pages 783-800, April.
    7. Jianfa Shen, 2010. "Cooperation and Competition Between Cities: Urban Development Strategies in Hong Kong and Shenzhen," Chapters, in: Peter Karl Kresl (ed.), Economic Strategies for Mature Industrial Economies, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5405 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Stephanie Farmer & Chris D Poulos, 2019. "The financialising local growth machine in Chicago," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 1404-1425, May.
    10. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    11. Eran Ben-Joseph, 2009. "Commentary: Designing Codes: Trends in Cities, Planning and Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(12), pages 2691-2702, November.
    12. Ben Derudder & Michael Hoyler & Peter J. Taylor & Frank Witlox (ed.), 2011. "International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13622.
    13. Hong Liu & Ting‐Yan Wang, 2021. "The institutionalization and effectiveness of transnational policy transfer: The China–Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park as a case study," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(3), pages 103-114, August.
    14. Yoonseuk Woo & Chris Webster, 2014. "Co-evolution of gated communities and local public goods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(12), pages 2539-2554, September.
    15. Schröder Friederike & Waibel Michael, 2012. "Urban governance and informality in China’s Pearl River Delta: Investigating economic restructuring in Guangzhou," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 56(1-2), pages 97-112, October.
    16. Cecilia Chu, 2010. "People Power as Exception: Three Controversies of Privatisation in Post-handover Hong Kong," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(8), pages 1773-1792, July.
    17. Tobias Franz, 2019. "Why ‘Good Governance’ Fails: Lessons from Regional Economic Development in Colombia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 776-785, July.
    18. Paul Waley, 2007. "Tokyo-as-World-City: Reassessing the Role of Capital and the State in Urban Restructuring," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1465-1490, July.
    19. Cassidy I‐Chih Lan & Jianglong Chen, 2022. "URBAN NOSTALGIA, REGENERATION, AND CULTURAL MONOPOLY RENT: ‘Nanjing 1912’ and Its Branding Bubbles," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 954-972, November.
    20. Carlo Salone, 2013. "Defining the urban economic and administrative spaces," Chapters, in: Peter Karl Kresl & Jaime Sobrino (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Urban Economies, chapter 9, pages 205-234, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    21. Eugene J. McCann, 2004. "'Best Places': Interurban Competition, Quality of Life and Popular Media Discourse," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(10), pages 1909-1929, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:46:y:2009:i:8:p:1702-1722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.