IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v40y2016i4p849-865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residential Enclosure, Power and Relationality: Rethinking Sociopolitical Relations in Southeast Asian Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Fauveaud

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Fauveaud, 2016. "Residential Enclosure, Power and Relationality: Rethinking Sociopolitical Relations in Southeast Asian Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 849-865, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:40:y:2016:i:4:p:849-865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1468-2427.12433
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gavin Shatkin, 2008. "The City and the Bottom Line: Urban Megaprojects and the Privatization of Planning in Southeast Asia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(2), pages 383-401, February.
    2. Ayona Datta, 2014. "Gendered Nature and Urban Culture: The Dialectics of Gated Developments in Izmir, Turkey," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1363-1383, July.
    3. Gillad Rosen & Eran Razin, 2009. "The Rise of Gated Communities in Israel: Reflections on Changing Urban Governance in a Neo-liberal Era," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(8), pages 1702-1722, July.
    4. Gabriel Fauveaud, 2014. "Mutations of real estate actors’ strategies and modes of capital appropriation in contemporary Phnom Penh," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(16), pages 3479-3494, December.
    5. Abigail M. York & Michael E. Smith & Benjamin W. Stanley & Barbara L. Stark & Juliana Novic & Sharon L. Harlan & George L. Cowgill & Christopher G. Boone, 2011. "Ethnic and Class Clustering through the Ages: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Urban Neighbourhood Social Patterns," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(11), pages 2399-2415, August.
    6. J Connell, 1999. "Beyond Manila: Walls, Malls, and Private Spaces," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(3), pages 417-439, March.
    7. Sharon Zukin, 1998. "Urban Lifestyles: Diversity and Standardisation in Spaces of Consumption," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(5-6), pages 825-839, May.
    8. Rodrigo Salcedo & Alvaro Torres, 2004. "Gated Communities in Santiago: Wall or Frontier?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 27-44, March.
    9. Peter Aning Tedong & Jill L. Grant & Wan Nor Azriyati Wan Abd Aziz, 2015. "Governing Enclosure: The Role of Governance in Producing Gated Communities and Guarded Neighborhoods in Malaysia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 112-128, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adèle Esposito & Gabriel Fauveaud, 2019. "The atomization of heritage politics in post-colonial cities: The case of Phnom Penh, Cambodia," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(4), pages 670-688, June.
    2. Tingting Lu & Fangzhu Zhang & Fulong Wu, 2020. "The variegated role of the state in different gated neighbourhoods in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(8), pages 1642-1659, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Meerow, 2017. "Double exposure, infrastructure planning, and urban climate resilience in coastal megacities: A case study of Manila," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(11), pages 2649-2672, November.
    2. Michael Janoschka & Jorge Sequera & Luis Salinas, 2014. "Gentrification in Spain and Latin America — a Critical Dialogue," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1234-1265, July.
    3. Adrienne La Grange, 2014. "Hong Kong's Gating Machine," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 251-269, March.
    4. Tingting Lu & Fangzhu Zhang & Fulong Wu, 2020. "The variegated role of the state in different gated neighbourhoods in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(8), pages 1642-1659, June.
    5. Dennis Rodgers, 2011. "Separate but Equal Democratization?: Participation, Politics, and Urban Segregation in Latin America," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-016, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. K. Landman, 2011. "Urban Fragmentation: Different Views on its Causes and Consequences," Chapters, in: H. S. Geyer (ed.), International Handbook of Urban Policy, Volume 3, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Katherine E. Laycock & Carrie L. Mitchell, 2019. "Social capital and incremental transformative change: responding to climate change experts in Metro Manila," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 47-66, January.
    8. Koki Seki, 2015. "Capitalizing on Desire: Reconfiguring ‘the Social’ and the Government of Poverty in the Philippines," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(6), pages 1253-1276, November.
    9. Charlotte Lemanski, 2006. "Spaces of Exclusivity or Connection? Linkages between a Gated Community and its Poorer Neighbour in a Cape Town Master Plan Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(2), pages 397-420, February.
    10. Ballard, Richard & Jones, Gareth A. & Ngwenya, Makale, 2021. "Trickle-out urbanism: are Johannesburg’s gated estates good for their poor neighbours?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110855, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Balázs Kovács & Glenn R. Carroll & David W. Lehman, 2014. "Authenticity and Consumer Value Ratings: Empirical Tests from the Restaurant Domain," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 458-478, April.
    12. Yoonseuk Woo & Chris Webster, 2014. "Co-evolution of gated communities and local public goods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(12), pages 2539-2554, September.
    13. Mine Eder & Özlem Öz, 2015. "Neoliberalization of Istanbul's Nightlife: Beer or Champagne?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 284-304, March.
    14. Manuel Tironi, 2009. "The Lost Community? Public Housing and Social Capital in Santiago de Chile, 1985–2001," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 974-997, December.
    15. Murali, Ranjini & Suryawanshi, Kulbushansingh & Redpath, Stephen & Nagendra, Harini & Mishra, Charudutt, 2019. "Changing use of ecosystem services along a rural-urban continuum in the Indian Trans-Himalayas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    16. Rodrigo Mora & Pablo Moran, 2020. "Public Bike Sharing Programs Under the Prism of Urban Planning Officials: The Case of Santiago de Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Jinhee Park, 2019. "Neoliberalism Meets “Gangnam Style”: Vernacular Private Sector and Large Urban Developments in Seoul," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 62-72.
    18. Chaitawat Boonjubun, 2019. "Also the Urban Poor Live in Gated Communities: A Bangkok Case Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Il Lee & Soe Won Hwang, 2018. "Urban Entertainment Center (UEC) as a Redevelopment Strategy for Large-Scale Post-Industrial Sites in Seoul: Between Public Policy and Privatization of Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Eran Weinberg & Nir Cohen & Orit Rotem-Mindali, 2019. "LUD as an Instrument for (Sub)Metropolitanization: The 1000-District in Rishon-Lezion, Israel as a Case Study," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 18-30.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:40:y:2016:i:4:p:849-865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.