IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v40y2003i8p1573-1590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety in Numbers? Modelling Crowds and Designing Control for the Notting Hill Carnival

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Batty

    (Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK, m.batty@ucl.ac.uk)

  • Jake Desyllas

    (Intelligent Space Partnership, 68 Great Eastern Street, London, EC4 6XZ, UK, jdesyllas@intelligentspace.com)

  • Elspeth Duxbury

    (Intelligent Space Partnership, 68 Great Eastern Street, London, EC4 6XZ, UK. Fax: 020 7739 9547, eduxbury@intelligentspace.com)

Abstract

Events such as carnivals, parades, rock concerts, football matches, some types of shopping-indeed, any situation involving rapid exit or entrance from or to high-capacity buildings and vehicles—pose significant problems of public safety. Models designed to predict crowding at such events are in their infancy and the best so far simulate panic situations and evacuation possibilities within buildings and similarly confined spaces. In carnivals and street parades, movement is over a much wider area and crowds form as much through competition between attractions as through confinement in small spaces. A model is proposed in which the event space is first explored by agents using 'swarm intelligence'. Armed with information about the space, agents then move in an unobstructed fashion to the event. Congestion is slowly reduced by introducing controls until a 'safe solution' is reached. The latter stages of the simulation require intervention by those who manage the event, the police. The model has been developed to simulate the effect of changing the route of the Notting Hill Carnival, an annual event held over two days in August each year in a 3 sq km area of west central London. The event attracts over 1 million visitors and is widely regarded as posing a major threat to public safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Batty & Jake Desyllas & Elspeth Duxbury, 2003. "Safety in Numbers? Modelling Crowds and Designing Control for the Notting Hill Carnival," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(8), pages 1573-1590, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:8:p:1573-1590
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000094432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098032000094432
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098032000094432?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Helbing & Illés Farkas & Tamás Vicsek, 2000. "Simulating dynamical features of escape panic," Nature, Nature, vol. 407(6803), pages 487-490, September.
    2. David Batten, 2000. "Complex Landscapes of Spatial Interaction," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Aura Reggiani (ed.), Spatial Economic Science, chapter 4, pages 51-74, Springer.
    3. Kirchner, Ansgar & Schadschneider, Andreas, 2002. "Simulation of evacuation processes using a bionics-inspired cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 260-276.
    4. Aura Reggiani (ed.), 2000. "Spatial Economic Science," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-642-59787-9, February.
    5. Burstedde, C & Klauck, K & Schadschneider, A & Zittartz, J, 2001. "Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a two-dimensional cellular automaton," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 507-525.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Horst Hamacher & Stephanie Heller & Benjamin Rupp, 2013. "Flow location (FlowLoc) problems: dynamic network flows and location models for evacuation planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 207(1), pages 161-180, August.
    2. Letizia Appolloni & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2019. "The Pleasure of Walking: An Innovative Methodology to Assess Appropriate Walkable Performance in Urban Areas to Support Transport Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Abdelghany, Ahmed & Abdelghany, Khaled & Mahmassani, Hani, 2016. "A hybrid simulation-assignment modeling framework for crowd dynamics in large-scale pedestrian facilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 159-176.
    4. Peng, Wuyuan, 2011. "Coal sector reform and its implications for the power sector in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 60-71, March.
    5. Huang, Zhiren & Wang, Pu & Zhang, Fan & Gao, Jianxi & Schich, Maximilian, 2018. "A mobility network approach to identify and anticipate large crowd gatherings," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 147-170.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Varas, A. & Cornejo, M.D. & Mainemer, D. & Toledo, B. & Rogan, J. & Muñoz, V. & Valdivia, J.A., 2007. "Cellular automaton model for evacuation process with obstacles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 382(2), pages 631-642.
    2. Dirk Helbing & Pratik Mukerji, "undated". "Crowd Disasters as Systemic Failures: Analysis of the Love Parade Disaster," Working Papers ETH-RC-12-010, ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design.
    3. Liu, Qian, 2018. "A social force model for the crowd evacuation in a terrorist attack," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 315-330.
    4. Huan-Huan, Tian & Li-Yun, Dong & Yu, Xue, 2015. "Influence of the exits’ configuration on evacuation process in a room without obstacle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 164-178.
    5. Ezaki, Takahiro & Yanagisawa, Daichi & Ohtsuka, Kazumichi & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2012. "Simulation of space acquisition process of pedestrians using Proxemic Floor Field Model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(1), pages 291-299.
    6. Zheng, Xiaoping & Cheng, Yuan, 2011. "Conflict game in evacuation process: A study combining Cellular Automata model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(6), pages 1042-1050.
    7. Fu, Libi & Liu, Yuxing & Shi, Yongqian & Zhao, Yongxiang, 2021. "Dynamics of bidirectional pedestrian flow in a corridor including individuals with disabilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 580(C).
    8. Fang, Zhi-Ming & Song, Wei-Guo & Liu, Xuan & Lv, Wei & Ma, Jian & Xiao, Xia, 2012. "A continuous distance model (CDM) for the single-file pedestrian movement considering step frequency and length," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(1), pages 307-316.
    9. Li, Yang & Chen, Maoyin & Zheng, Xiaoping & Dou, Zhan & Cheng, Yuan, 2020. "Relationship between behavior aggressiveness and pedestrian dynamics using behavior-based cellular automata model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    10. Mohd Ibrahim, Azhar & Venkat, Ibrahim & Wilde, Philippe De, 2017. "Uncertainty in a spatial evacuation model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 485-497.
    11. Wang, Jia & Ni, Shunjiang & Shen, Shifei & Li, Shuying, 2019. "Empirical study of crowd dynamic in public gathering places during a terrorist attack event," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 1-9.
    12. Li, Shengnan & Li, Xingang & Qu, Yunchao & Jia, Bin, 2015. "Block-based floor field model for pedestrian’s walking through corner," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 432(C), pages 337-353.
    13. Huang, Rong & Zhao, Xuan & Zhou, Chenyu & Kong, Lingchen & Liu, Chengqing & Yu, Qiang, 2022. "Static floor field construction and fine discrete cellular automaton model: Algorithms, simulations and insights," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    14. Yu Song & Jia Liu & Qian Liu, 2021. "Dynamic Decision-Making Process of Evacuees during Post-Earthquake Evacuation near an Automatic Flap Barrier Gate System: A Broken Windows Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Henein, Colin Marc & White, Tony, 2010. "Microscopic information processing and communication in crowd dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(21), pages 4636-4653.
    16. Zhang, Xinwei & Zhang, Peihong & Zhong, Maohua, 2021. "A dual adaptive cellular automaton model based on a composite field and pedestrian heterogeneity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    17. Wang, Tao & Huang, Keke & Cheng, Yuan & Zheng, Xiaoping, 2015. "Understanding herding based on a co-evolutionary model for strategy and game structure," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 84-90.
    18. Lovreglio, Ruggiero & Ronchi, Enrico & Nilsson, Daniel, 2015. "Calibrating floor field cellular automaton models for pedestrian dynamics by using likelihood function optimization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 438(C), pages 308-320.
    19. Gao, Jin & He, Jun & Gong, Jinghai, 2020. "A simplified method to provide evacuation guidance in a multi-exit building under emergency," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    20. Liu, Qian, 2018. "The effect of dedicated exit on the evacuation of heterogeneous pedestrians," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 305-323.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:8:p:1573-1590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.