IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v9y2003i2p302-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Employers: the hidden face of European industrial relations

Author

Listed:
  • Etienne Arcq

    (Researcher at the Centre de recherche et d'information socio-politiques (Brussels))

  • Anne Dufresne

    (Researcher at the Observatoire social européen)

  • Philippe Pochet

    (Director of the Observatoire social européen and EU Fulbright Scholar-in-Residence at the University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Abstract

The first section of this article recalls the most important organisational features of the cross-industry players in the European social dialogue (UNICE, UEAPME, CEEP). Four sectoral employer federations (WEM, Euratex, FIEC, EuroCommerce), selected on grounds of the specific nature of their profile, are also analysed here in view of the increasing importance currently taken on by the sectoral social dialogue. The second part of the article reports on the achievements of the social dialogue as seen by the employers. This dialogue has seen at least two salient events: in 1991, when the cross-industry social partners signed an agreement laying down collective bargaining practices; and more recently when a first voluntary agreement on telework was concluded. This agreement represents for the European employers, as for the trade unions, a radical change in terms of affirming their autonomy in drawing up their work programme and in the way that negotiated solutions are implemented. This has also been a period of consolidation for UNICE as a body representing Europe's employers, while CEEP has embarked on new – territorial – forms of representation. As for UEAPME, a peripheral body in the early 1990s, it has gradually asserted itself as a fully-fledged protagonist in the social dialogue.

Suggested Citation

  • Etienne Arcq & Anne Dufresne & Philippe Pochet, 2003. "The Employers: the hidden face of European industrial relations," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 302-321, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:9:y:2003:i:2:p:302-321
    DOI: 10.1177/102425890300900210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/102425890300900210
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/102425890300900210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coen, David, 1998. "The European Business Interest and the Nation State: Large-firm Lobbying in the European Union and Member States," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 75-100, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Natali & Caroline de la Porte, 2009. "Participation through the Lisbon strategy: comparing the European Employment Strategy and pensions OMC," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 15(1), pages 71-91, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raj Chari & Daniel Hillebrand O'Donovan, 2011. "Lobbying the European Commission: Open or secret?," Working Papers 2011-11, Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales.
    2. Michaël Tatham & Mads Thau, 2014. "The more the merrier: Accounting for regional paradiplomats in Brussels," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(2), pages 255-276, June.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5417 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Patrick Bernhagen & Neil J. Mitchell, 2009. "The Determinants of Direct Corporate Lobbying in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 10(2), pages 155-176, June.
    5. Pablo T. Spiller & Sanny Liao, 2006. "Buy, Lobby or Sue: Interest Groups' Participation in Policy Making - A Selective Survey," NBER Working Papers 12209, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Alves, Amanda M. & Brousseau, Eric & Mimouni, Nada & Yeung, Timothy Yu-Cheong, 2021. "Competing for policy: Lobbying in the EU wholesale roaming regulation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3).
    7. Åse Gornitzka & Ulf Sverdrup, 2015. "Societal Inclusion in Expert Venues: Participation of Interest Groups and Business in the European Commission Expert Groups," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 151-165.
    8. Cornelia Woll, 2006. "Lobbying in the European Union: From Sui Generis to a Comparative Perspective," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01021182, HAL.
    9. Andrew Barron & Peter Hultén, 2011. "Corporate Political Strategizing in the European Union during the 2007–10 Recession: An Exploratory Study," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(5), pages 783-801, October.
    10. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Joost Berkhout & David Lowery, 2010. "The changing demography of the EU interest system since 1990," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(3), pages 447-461, September.
    12. Stefan Kentrup & Andreas Hoffjan & Maik Lachmann, 2013. "Wie betreiben Unternehmen Lobbying? Eine empirische Analyse der Einflussfaktoren, Ausgestaltungsformen und Strategien," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 342-371, June.
    13. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Andreas Broscheid & David Coen, 2003. "Insider and Outsider Lobbying of the European Commission," European Union Politics, , vol. 4(2), pages 165-189, June.
    16. Broscheid, Andreas & Coen, David, 2006. "Lobbying systems in the European Union: A quantitative study," MPIfG Working Paper 06/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    17. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Rainer Eising, 2007. "Institutional Context, Organizational Resources and Strategic Choices," European Union Politics, , vol. 8(3), pages 329-362, September.
    19. Michael Moran, 2010. "The political economy of regulation: Does it have any lessons for accounting research?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 215-225.
    20. Rauh, Christian, 2019. "EU politicization and policy initiatives of the European Commission: the case of consumer policy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(3), pages 344-365.
    21. Dorottya Sallai, 2013. "European Union Lobbying and the Golden Cage of Post-Socialist Network Capitalism in Hungary," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 948-964, September.
    22. Amrita Saha & Vikrant Shirodkar & Thomas C. Lawton, 2023. "Bimodal lobbying and trade policy outcomes: Evidence from corporate political activity under uncertainty in India," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 24-46, March.
    23. Christian Lahusen, 2003. "Moving Into the European Orbit," European Union Politics, , vol. 4(2), pages 191-218, June.
    24. Silvia Console Battilana, 2007. "Uncovered Power: External Agenda Setting, Sophisticated Voting, and Transnational Lobbying," CESifo Working Paper Series 2138, CESifo.
    25. Cornelia Woll, 2006. "Lobbying in the European Union: From Sui Generis to a Comparative Perspective," Post-Print hal-01021182, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:9:y:2003:i:2:p:302-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.