IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v65y2013i4d10.1007_bf03373717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wie betreiben Unternehmen Lobbying? Eine empirische Analyse der Einflussfaktoren, Ausgestaltungsformen und Strategien

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Kentrup

    (Roche Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH)

  • Andreas Hoffjan

    (Technische Universität Dortmund)

  • Maik Lachmann

    (Technische Universität Dortmund)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Durch Lobbyingaktivitäten nehmen Unternehmen eine aktive Rolle im Zuge politischer Entscheidungsprozesse ein. Allerdings liegen in nur geringem Umfang empirische Forschungserkenntnisse über die Art und Weise vor, in der Unternehmen Lobbying betreiben. Die vorliegende Studie leistet einen Beitrag zur Schließung dieser Forschungslücke, indem zunächst Faktoren identifiziert werden, die das Ausmaß lobbyistischer Maßnahmen in Unternehmen beeinflussen. Im Anschluss werden Ausgestaltung und organisatorische Umsetzung von Lobbyingaktivitäten untersucht. Abschließend wird überprüft, in welchem Maße sie einen Teil unternehmerischer Wettbewerbsstrategien darstellen. Die Beantwortung der Forschungsfragen geschieht mithilfe einer Feldstudie in ausgewählten Branchen.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Kentrup & Andreas Hoffjan & Maik Lachmann, 2013. "Wie betreiben Unternehmen Lobbying? Eine empirische Analyse der Einflussfaktoren, Ausgestaltungsformen und Strategien," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 342-371, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:65:y:2013:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03373717
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03373717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03373717
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03373717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    2. George J. Stigler, 1971. "The Theory of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(1), pages 3-21, Spring.
    3. Hansen, Wendy L. & Mitchell, Neil J., 2001. "Globalization or National Capitalism: Large Firms, National Strategies, and Political Activities," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 5-19, April.
    4. Paul Willman & David Coen & David Currie & Martin Siner, 2003. "The evolution of regulatory relationships; regulatory institutions and firm behaviour in privatized industries," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(1), pages 69-89, February.
    5. Coen, David, 1998. "The European Business Interest and the Nation State: Large-firm Lobbying in the European Union and Member States," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 75-100, January.
    6. Hansen Wendy L. & Mitchell Neil J., 2001. "Globalization or National Capitalism: Large Firms, National Strategies, and Political Activities," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Kim Jin-Hyuk, 2008. "Corporate Lobbying Revisited," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Wilson, Graham K., 1990. "Corporate Political Strategies," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 281-288, April.
    9. Sanjib Bhuyan, 2000. "Corporate Political Activities and Oligopoly Welfare Loss," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 17(4), pages 411-426, December.
    10. Bonardi Jean-Philippe, 1999. "Market and Nonmarket Strategies During Deregulation: The Case of British Telecom," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 203-232, August.
    11. Sören Agne & Andreas Hoffjan & Heinz-Werner Ufer, 2011. "Zur Interdependenz von Regulierung und interner Unternehmensrechnung — Netzübergänge im Rahmen der Anreizregulierung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 278-302, May.
    12. Kim, Jin-Hyuk, 2008. "Corporate Lobbying Revisited," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Bonardi, Jean-Philippe, 1999. "Market and Nonmarket Strategies During Deregulation: The Case of British Telecom," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 203-231, August.
    14. Tucker Andrew, 2008. "Trade Associations as Industry Reputation Agents: A Model of Reputational Trust," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-28, May.
    15. Tucker, Andrew, 2008. "Trade Associations as Industry Reputation Agents: A Model of Reputational Trust," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Carlos Marques, 2017. "Industry Business Associations: Self-Interested or Socially Conscious?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 733-751, July.
    2. Amrita Saha & Vikrant Shirodkar & Thomas C. Lawton, 2023. "Bimodal lobbying and trade policy outcomes: Evidence from corporate political activity under uncertainty in India," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 24-46, March.
    3. Brodmann, Jennifer & Unsal, Omer & Hassan, M. Kabir, 2019. "Political lobbying, insider trading, and CEO compensation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 548-565.
    4. Hui Chen & David Parsley & Ya-Wen Yang, 2015. "Corporate Lobbying and Firm Performance," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3-4), pages 444-481, April.
    5. van Kranenburg, Hans & Voinea, Cosmina Lelia, 2017. "Nonmarket strategies predictors for foreign firms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 82-92.
    6. Rajwani, Tazeeb & Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele, 2015. "Political activity and firm performance within nonmarket research: A review and international comparative assessment," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 273-283.
    7. Kanol Direnç, 2015. "Social influence, competition and the act of lobbying," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 75-96, April.
    8. Hultén, Peter & Barron, Andrew & Bryson, Douglas, 2012. "Cross-country differences in attitudes to business associations during the 2007–2010 recession," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 352-361.
    9. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8526 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Wei-Fong Pan, 2023. "Does a firm’s lobbying activity respond to its peers’ lobbying activity?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 297-324, March.
    11. Alam, Ahmed W. & Farjana, Ashupta & Houston, Reza, 2024. "Geopolitical risk, CEO power, and corporate lobbying: Do powerful CEOs lobby more?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    12. Buchanan, Sean & Marques, José Carlos, 2018. "How home country industry associations influence MNE international CSR practices: Evidence from the Canadian mining industry," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 63-74.
    13. Cornelia Woll & Alvaro Artigas, 2007. "When Trade Liberalization Turns into Regulatory Reform: The Impact on Business-Government Relations in International Trade Politics," Post-Print hal-01071209, HAL.
    14. Sanjay Patnaik, 2019. "A cross-country study of collective political strategy: Greenhouse gas regulations in the European Union," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(7), pages 1130-1155, September.
    15. Larrain Aylwin, M.J. & Prüfer, J.O., 2014. "Business Associations, Lobbying, and Endogenous Institutions," Other publications TiSEM 99d2d002-87d2-4d8e-b1d9-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Lawton, Thomas & Rajwani, Tazeeb & Doh, Jonathan, 2013. "The antecedents of political capabilities: A study of ownership, cross-border activity and organization at legacy airlines in a deregulatory context," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 228-242.
    17. Weymouth Stephen, 2013. "Firm lobbying and influence in developing countries: a multilevel approach," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, January.
    18. Juliane Markscheffel & Michael Plouffe, 2022. "Multilevel determinants of MNC corruption risk," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(4), pages 512-528, December.
    19. Vikrant Shirodkar & Alexander T. Mohr, 2015. "Resource Tangibility and Foreign Firms’ Corporate Political Strategies in Emerging Economies: Evidence from India," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 801-825, December.
    20. Matthew McCarten & Ivan Diaz‐Rainey & Helen Roberts & Eric K. M. Tan, 2022. "Political connections, tacit power and corporate misconduct," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(9-10), pages 1530-1552, October.
    21. Larrain Aylwin, M.J. & Prüfer, J.O., 2014. "Business Associations, Lobbying, and Endogenous Institutions," Other publications TiSEM bb36b0e2-f17f-4d76-8637-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    M10; M48;

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:65:y:2013:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03373717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.